← 返回新闻首页
马来西亚本地

MACC records RM1.27b in asset freezes from 2022 to September, says deputy minister

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 13 — The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) recorded asset freezes worth RM1.27 billion from 2022 to September this year, involving bank accounts,...

Malay MailMalay Mail查看原文 ↗
反贪污委员会副部长表示,该委员会2022年至9月期间冻结资产总额达12.7亿令吉。

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission froze assets worth RM1.27 billion from 2022 to September 2023 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act.

From January to September this year, 1,006 asset-freezing orders were issued, with 781 revoked without charges.

Freezing assets is an investigative step to prevent their transfer, and investigations are based on suspicious financial transactions.

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 13 — The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) recorded asset freezes worth RM1.27 billion from 2022 to September this year, involving bank accounts, jewellery, immovable property and other valuables.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran said the asset freezes were carried out under Section 44 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (Act 613).

He said 1,336 asset-freezing orders were issued under the Act in 2025, while another 1,006 were issued from Jan 1 to Sept 30 this year.

A total of 481 freezing orders were revoked without charges in 2025, while another 781 were revoked in the first nine months of this year, he added.

“The withdrawal, cancellation or variation of an asset-freezing order does not necessarily mean that no offence has occurred or that the investigation has no basis.

“This is because freezing assets is part of the investigative process and an enforcement measure to prevent assets suspected of being linked to an offence from being transferred, disposed of or traded,” he said.

He was answering a question from Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong on the power to freeze assets under Section 44 of Act 613, as well as regulatory and investigative issues involving the MACC, during the Special Chamber sitting in the Dewan Rakyat today.

Kulasegaran said investigations conducted by the MACC and other enforcement agencies were not carried out arbitrarily, but in accordance with established criteria.

He said preliminary action was taken based on reports, prima facie investigations and the presence of suspicious transactions, such as unusually large sums of money moving in and out of accounts.

The 90-day period provided under Section 44 of Act 613 allows a freezing order to be revoked as soon as possible once an investigation has been completed, he added.

“I agree with the Honourable Member that having a law such as the one in Singapore, which is more independent and impartial ... would be better if it were left to the courts.

“This is something I have read about and examined, and I have told the agency concerned to look into it because it would be a win-win position, and the MACC’s good name would be respected,” he said.

He was responding to a supplementary question from Wee on the need to tighten governance, including requiring court approval before freezing accounts or seizing assets belonging to listed companies, to protect the interests of minority shareholders. — Bernama

Budget 2027 should accelerate transition from R&D to Malaysian technology, says Mimos

Ministry to ensure Budget 2027 funds benefit women, children, OKU and elderly, says Nancy Shukri

Johor records nearly 10,000 commercial crime cases with RM212.64m in losses, says state top cop

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻