Thaksin’s mansion and bulletproof cars on the line as court reserves decision on tax debt injunction to halt collection

October 11, 2026 at 10:58 pm

in Living , Media , Politics , Thailand

Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra faces a November court showdown over ฿17.6 billion in unpaid taxes. Five luxury cars, including two bulletproof vehicles, bank deposits and Chiang Mai land face enforcement. Meanwhile, his famous Chan Song La mansion could become a target. Thaksin seeks an injunction, citing an earlier ฿46.37 billion confiscation. However, former corruption investigator Kaewsarn Atipothi rejects his defence, citing separate Supreme Court judgments. With just ฿90 million frozen in bank accounts, the Revenue Department could pursue further assets unless Thaksin secures court protection or pays up.

Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra fights a ฿17.6 billion tax debt as five luxury cars face seizure. His Chan Song La mansion draws scrutiny ahead of a court ruling. ( Source: Siam Rath )

Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra faces a critical November court ruling as Thailand’s Revenue Department pursues ฿17.6 billion in unpaid taxes. His bank accounts have been frozen, five luxury vehicles face enforcement, and land in Chiang Mai has been targeted.

Meanwhile, speculation is mounting over the fate of his famous Chan Song La mansion in Bangkok. Thaksin wants an injunction to halt further asset seizures. However, a former corruption investigator has challenged his defence, citing two separate Supreme Court judgments. Unless Thaksin secures protection or settles the debt, more of his remaining fortune could face enforcement action.

The Central Tax Court heard Thaksin’s injunction application on Wednesday, October 7. The former prime minister appeared personally and gave evidence for approximately two hours. He warned that continued enforcement could cause serious damage before his latest legal challenge concludes.

Thaksin seeks court protection for bulletproof cars as tax officials pursue frozen accounts and land

In particular, he raised concerns about losing two bulletproof vehicles used for personal security. Both are among five luxury cars already subjected to collection measures.

The Revenue Department has also frozen approximately ฿90 million in bank deposits. Separately, it has targeted land jointly owned by Thaksin and his sister in Chiang Mai. These measures follow a final Supreme Court ruling in 2025 upholding the substantial tax assessment.

Consequently, the dispute has moved beyond the original assessment. The immediate question is whether collection can continue while Thaksin challenges the enforcement process.

The court is expected to rule on his injunction in November. Several Thai reports identify November 16, although others give November 26. Meanwhile, the Revenue Department has opposed the application.

Alternatively, it wants financial security if the court grants temporary protection. Its formal defence is due by November 9, following an extension. Further proceedings are scheduled for December 21, including mediation and consideration of disputed issues and evidence.

Chan Song La mansion draws attention as Kaewsarn rejects claims of duplicate seizure over Shin shares

For Thaksin, the financial exposure extends far beyond the money already frozen. His luxury vehicles, bank deposits and Chiang Mai land are caught up in enforcement. Moreover, the Revenue Department could pursue additional legally available assets if existing recoveries prove insufficient.

That possibility has intensified speculation about his remaining fortune, particularly the Chan Song La residence in Bangkok’s Thonburi area. However, no confirmed seizure or attachment against the mansion has emerged from the available court reports.

The former prime minister’s lawyers are challenging the state’s attempt to recover money connected with the Shin Corporation share transaction. They maintain that the government previously confiscated proceeds associated with the same deal.

Therefore, they question whether the Revenue Department can now demand another substantial payment. Their argument has revived controversy surrounding investigations launched after the September 2006 military coup.

However, former corruption investigator Kaewsarn Atipothi has rejected that interpretation. Kaewsarn served on the Committee for the Examination of Actions Causing Damage to the State. The committee was established following Thaksin’s removal from office in the 2006 coup.

He maintains that the original confiscation and the present tax debt concern separate legal obligations. The first involved benefits obtained through abuse of political office. By contrast, the current case concerns personal income tax arising from the share transaction.

Supreme Court confiscation of ฿46.37 billion followed judicial findings despite the coup-era inquiry

Accordingly, Kaewsarn argues that the earlier confiscation cannot automatically discharge the subsequent tax liability. On February 26, 2010, the Supreme Court ordered the confiscation of ฿46,373,687,454.70 connected with Thaksin’s Shin Corporation holdings.

The ruling followed investigations into his financial interests and government decisions during his premiership. The court examined benefits connected with the telecommunications company and decisions affecting its commercial interests.

Importantly, the military-appointed investigative committee did not issue the confiscation order. Instead, the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions decided the case. The judges considered the evidence before delivering their ruling.

Consequently, Kaewsarn argues that the investigation’s military origins do not automatically invalidate the subsequent judgment. The committee gathered evidence, but the court determined the legal consequences.

Thaksin’s lawyers have invoked the principle commonly known as the fruit of the poisonous tree. This argument challenges evidence or proceedings arising from an unlawful source. In this case, the objection concerns investigations initiated under the military government following Thaksin’s removal from office.

His legal team questions the legitimacy of proceedings originating from the coup. However, Kaewsarn maintains that the investigative committee neither determined guilt nor ordered the final confiscation.

Kaewsarn points to separate tax judgment as Thaksin challenges the legal origins of confiscation

Instead, the evidence passed through the judicial process before the Supreme Court decided the case. Therefore, Kaewsarn disputes suggestions that the investigation’s origins invalidate the confiscation. Nevertheless, Thaksin’s lawyers continue to distinguish the original proceedings from enforcement of the subsequent tax judgment. That distinction remains central to the latest legal contest over his assets.

The former investigator has also highlighted the precise amount confiscated in 2010. The Supreme Court did not seize every baht associated with the Shin Corporation transaction.

Rather, it identified approximately ฿46.37 billion as benefits connected with wrongdoing. Meanwhile, approximately ฿27 billion was returned to the family under the court’s ruling. Other assets remained outside the confiscation order, including the Chan Song La residence.

Consequently, the earlier proceedings did not strip Thaksin of all his property. The present case concerns a separate tax liability arising from the Shin Corporation share sale. The Revenue Department assessed approximately ฿17.6 billion in personal income tax. Subsequently, the Supreme Court’s Tax Division upheld that assessment in 2025. The judgment provided the legal foundation for the department’s current collection efforts.

Thaksin is therefore facing enforcement of a final judgment rather than an unresolved administrative assessment. Kaewsarn argues that this changes the taxpayer’s legal position. Once a debt becomes enforceable, collection is not necessarily restricted to assets connected with the original transaction.

Revenue Department can pursue other assets to recover tax debt, former corruption investigator argues

Instead, the Revenue Department can pursue other property legally available to satisfy the outstanding amount. That includes valuable assets unrelated to the transaction that generated the tax liability.

The former investigator illustrated his argument using a hypothetical land transaction. A person might sell land for millions of baht while failing to declare the proceeds. If the unpaid tax becomes enforceable, the Revenue Department could pursue the debtor’s vehicle.

It would not necessarily have to recover the money from the original land sale. Similarly, Kaewsarn argues that Thaksin’s luxury cars and other property can become targets for tax enforcement.

He maintains that the latest measures differ fundamentally from the 2010 confiscation. The earlier ruling concerned assets identified as benefits from wrongdoing.

By comparison, the current measures seek payment of an outstanding tax debt upheld by the Supreme Court. Furthermore, confiscation of improperly obtained benefits does not necessarily constitute payment of personal income tax. The two judgments arose through separate proceedings and imposed different legal consequences.

The timing also matters. The 2025 tax ruling came approximately 15 years after the original confiscation. Therefore, the earlier judgment was already part of the legal history when the tax dispute concluded. Nevertheless, Thaksin’s lawyers maintain that the present proceedings concern enforcement rather than the tax assessment’s validity. Their immediate application seeks temporary protection against further collection measures.

Thaksin warns loss of bulletproof vehicles threatens his security as Revenue Department opposes relief

In parallel, Thaksin has placed considerable emphasis on his specially protected vehicles. During the October 7 hearing, he told the court that two of the five affected cars were bulletproof. The vehicles were specially constructed with bullet-resistant glass.

He cited previous assassination attempts and continuing concerns for his personal safety. Furthermore, Thaksin argued that replacing the vehicles would take considerable time, potentially leaving him exposed to danger.

The claim forms part of his application for temporary protection. However, the Revenue Department is resisting any suspension of enforcement. Alternatively, it wants financial security before the court grants an injunction. That could introduce another substantial requirement for Thaksin.

His lawyer, Winyat Chatmontri, presented a former Revenue Department official as a witness. Meanwhile, two tax collection officers testified for the department.

The hearing examined the consequences of continued enforcement before the latest challenge concludes. Thaksin expressed concern that affected assets could be auctioned before the court reaches a final decision. Consequently, the injunction could determine whether the Revenue Department advances towards selling property already under enforcement measures. The precise legal status of each asset remains important, particularly the luxury vehicles.

Rolls-Royce and two-tone Maybach attract attention as questions surround five cars facing enforcement

Thaksin arrived at the October 7 hearing in a black Rolls-Royce bearing Bangkok registration PJ 195. He is also associated with a distinctive two-tone Mercedes-Maybach luxury limousine.

However, the available court reports do not conclusively identify which two vehicles are bulletproof. Nor do they establish whether the Rolls-Royce used for the hearing is among the five affected cars. Similarly, the enforcement status of the two-tone Maybach has not been confirmed.

What is established is that five luxury vehicles have been subjected to collection measures. Two are fitted with special ballistic protection. Nevertheless, attachment or seizure does not necessarily mean an immediate auction can proceed. Further legal steps may be required before the Revenue Department can sell the vehicles. The injunction decision could therefore have immediate consequences for their future.

On another front, attention has turned towards other valuable property associated with the former prime minister. Chief among them is Chan Song La, his famous Bangkok residence. The mansion in the Thonburi area has long served as a family home and political gathering place. It remains one of the properties most closely identified with Thaksin. Consequently, speculation about its possible seizure has intensified as the tax collection campaign advances.

No confirmed seizure of Chan Song La mansion as tax officials assess assets and outstanding liabilities

However, the available reporting does not establish that the Revenue Department has seized the mansion. There is also no confirmation of a registered attachment or scheduled auction involving the property. Its legal position therefore differs from the bank deposits, luxury vehicles and Chiang Mai land already affected. The crucial question is ownership and whether Thaksin holds an interest legally available for enforcement.

If Thaksin owns an identifiable interest, that interest could become relevant to future recovery proceedings. However, ownership by another family member or legal entity would create additional legal questions.

The Revenue Department would need an established basis for pursuing any such asset. Accordingly, speculation about the mansion cannot presently be treated as evidence of an impending seizure. Nevertheless, the outstanding debt makes Thaksin’s remaining property increasingly relevant.

The department has frozen approximately ฿90 million in bank deposits. That represents only a small proportion of the ฿17.6 billion being pursued. Even full recovery of those deposits would leave approximately ฿17.51 billion outstanding. Meanwhile, the combined value of the five vehicles and the Chiang Mai land has not been established. There is therefore no confirmed total for the assets currently available to satisfy the judgment.

Kaewsarn calls for wider tracing of Thaksin wealth, including property potentially held in England

If those assets prove insufficient, further recovery efforts may be necessary. Kaewsarn has urged the Revenue Department to investigate the former prime minister’s remaining wealth. He cited Forbes estimates placing Thaksin’s fortune above ฿72.5 billion. However, a published wealth estimate does not establish ownership of every asset included in the calculation. Nor does it demonstrate that all such property can be seized to satisfy a personal tax debt.

The legal ownership of individual assets remains decisive. Nevertheless, Kaewsarn argues that the department should pursue comprehensive asset tracing. He has identified overseas property as one possible area for investigation.

In particular, he referred to expensive residences in England. He suggested that legal cooperation arrangements could assist efforts to identify property potentially available for recovery.

However, such action would depend on applicable laws and cooperation between the relevant jurisdictions. The supplied material does not identify a confirmed overseas seizure linked to the current tax proceedings. Nor does it establish that specific British properties are legally available to satisfy Thaksin’s debt. Consequently, the suggestion concerns potential investigative action rather than a confirmed enforcement operation.

Possible family asset transfers and bulletproof vehicle auctions enter debate over tax debt enforcement

Kaewsarn has also raised the possibility of examining transfers to relatives. He referred to transactions involving promissory notes and other financial arrangements. Such instruments can record debts or financial obligations between parties.

However, their existence does not itself establish wrongdoing. Kaewsarn’s concern is whether any transfers were intended to place assets beyond creditors’ reach.

Where fraudulent transfers are established, he argues, the Revenue Department could consider legal proceedings to challenge them. That could involve seeking the cancellation of transactions intended to defeat recovery efforts. Nevertheless, no finding of fraudulent asset transfers by Thaksin is established in the supplied material. The suggestions concern possible investigative action rather than proven misconduct.

Separately, Kaewsarn has taken a firm position on the bulletproof vehicles. He argues that their protective equipment should not automatically exempt them from enforcement. Instead, he wants the Revenue Department to proceed against assets legally available to satisfy the judgment. He has even proposed selling the vehicles and directing the proceeds towards flood-control reservoirs. However, that proposal is his personal recommendation, not an announced government plan.

Any eventual auction would remain subject to the applicable enforcement procedures. The court must also decide whether Thaksin qualifies for temporary protection. That decision is now the immediate focus of the dispute. The Revenue Department has a final Supreme Court judgment supporting its claim. Thaksin, meanwhile, is attempting to suspend collection while challenging the enforcement process.

Court weighs injunction and possible financial security as two Supreme Court rulings shape the dispute

The court could grant the injunction, reject it or impose conditions. One possible condition would be financial security. Given the size of the debt, such a requirement could itself become significant. However, an injunction would not cancel the underlying tax liability.

It would only restrict enforcement within the terms established by the court. Conversely, rejection would not automatically permit the seizure of every property associated with Thaksin.

The Revenue Department would still have to comply with the relevant legal procedures. Ownership and enforceability would remain important for each asset. Meanwhile, the earlier confiscation continues to dominate the legal arguments. Thaksin’s lawyers maintain that the government previously took proceeds connected with the same transaction. They also question the origins of the investigation following the 2006 coup.

However, Kaewsarn points to the Supreme Court’s subsequent role in deciding the confiscation case. He argues that the original investigation and the eventual judicial ruling cannot simply be treated as identical acts. The 2010 judgment confiscated approximately ฿46.37 billion following findings concerning benefits obtained through political office. Separately, the 2025 judgment upheld a personal income tax assessment of approximately ฿17.6 billion.

Thaksin faces further recovery action as Revenue Department seeks payment under final tax judgment

The two rulings therefore concern different legal consequences. Moreover, the earlier confiscation did not eliminate Thaksin’s remaining wealth. Approximately ฿27 billion was returned to the family, while other property remained untouched.

That included Chan Song La, now the subject of renewed speculation. The Revenue Department’s present task is to recover the outstanding tax debt through legally available assets.

However, the amount already frozen in bank accounts falls far short of the sum demanded. The department has consequently moved against vehicles and land. Further enforcement could follow if the existing assets do not satisfy the liability. For Thaksin, the consequences are increasingly direct. He faces a multibillion-baht debt, frozen deposits and enforcement against valuable personal property.

His two bulletproof vehicles have also become central to his request for protection. Meanwhile, the legal status of his famous Bangkok residence remains unconfirmed. There is no established seizure against Chan Song La, despite speculation about its future. Nevertheless, any property legally owned by Thaksin could become relevant if further recovery action is pursued.

The former prime minister must now await the Central Tax Court’s decision on his injunction. The Revenue Department is due to file its formal defence by November 9. The ruling is reported for November 16 in several accounts, although November 26 appears in others. Further substantive proceedings are scheduled for December 21.

November injunction decision could determine whether enforcement proceeds against Thaksin assets

Until then, Thaksin’s latest legal challenge remains unresolved. However, the Supreme Court’s 2025 tax judgment continues to stand. The Revenue Department has already taken action against bank deposits, five luxury vehicles and Chiang Mai land. The immediate question is whether the court will order that enforcement to stop temporarily.

If Thaksin fails to secure protection, the department could continue recovery measures against legally available assets. If he cannot satisfy the judgment, further property could come under examination.

For now, his luxury vehicles and existing asset attachments represent the immediate financial danger. Meanwhile, Chan Song La remains outside the confirmed enforcement measures, despite speculation about its future.

The former prime minister’s next court ruling will therefore carry consequences far beyond the original Shin Corporation transaction. His ฿17.6 billion tax debt remains enforceable unless the court intervenes. With only ฿90 million in bank deposits frozen so far, the Revenue Department still faces a substantial recovery task. Thaksin, meanwhile, must secure temporary protection or face continuing enforcement against his remaining legally available assets.

Former PM in Tax Court in Bangkok seeking temporary injunction to halt Revenue Department’s enforcement

Thaksin seeks injunctive relief from Revenue efforts to collect 17 billion tax judgment in August 2025

Thaksin free after electronic bracelet is removed. Plans to fly to Dubai to see Yingluck at end of June

Thaksin faces his latest legal and financial hurdle with Revenue threat to bankrupt him over tax debt

Shock withdrawal of support for charter move shows the new coalition government is already under strain

Former Prime Minister Thaksin gains his full freedom after Royal Pardon to celebrate the Queen’s birthday

Things have changed in politics but Thaksin still faces legal issues including a 17 billion baht tax debt

Just an old man reporting on parole. Ex Premier in Mercedes Maybach reports to local Probation Office in Bangkok

Ex PM Thaksin’s release on Monday already celebrated by supporters and redshirts as he is granted parole

Joseph Anthony is an expat from Ireland who has lived in Thailand for the last decade. He has worked extensively in the media including editorial positions in Ireland and Thailand. He is focused on economic and business stories in Thailand as well as the expat lifestyle.

All posts by Joseph O' Connor

Eleven arrested in Saturday property raids linked to foreigners with links to criminality across Bangkok October 10, 2026 Police raid Bangkok’s luxury estates, targeting

Burmese drug kingpin with multiple identities and lives linked to massive cash seizure in Chiang Rai October 10, 2026 Dead in 2022. Arrested in South Korea in 2026. Noo

Thailand reels at story of mother taken against her will to a prison like nursing home with caged beds for inmates October 9, 2026 Police probe a family nightmare as Mother Phat, 63,

51 year old Frenchman arrested in Chiang Mai for running a tourist hostel through a nominee company October 9, 2026 Frenchman arrested after police raid a Chiang Mai

Queen is first Thai woman to fly a Swedish Gripen fighter jet. King in Surat Thani to congratulate her October 9, 2026 From Boeing jets to a supersonic fighter: Queen

Justice Minister and other cabinet members lead raids on Jewish centres in Bangkok as financial case grows October 8, 2026 A tiny Bangkok office registered to six entities, 61

Licenced online gambling site abroad linked to the husband of a government MP raises legal quandary October 8, 2026 A ฿1.9bn wealth controversy threatens to engulf

Horror care centre closed in Kanchanaburi where patients were locked into caged beds and prison cells October 7, 2026 Steel cage beds, barred rooms and psychiatric patients

New tourist tax of 450 baht a step closer with officials targeting early 2027 after cabinet approval is obtained October 7, 2026 Foreign tourists face a ฿450 Thai entry charge from

Corruption and crime crusader carted off to Bangkok Remand Prison after court refused last minute bail October 5, 2026 Atchariya is behind bars after losing bail as cyber

Vietnam’s economic growth races ahead of Thailand’s putting it on track to overtake its net GDP by 2029 October 5, 2026 Thailand’s economic lead is under pressure as

America reached out to Thais in Korat last weekend with a county fair show hosted by Ambassador O’ Neill October 5, 2026 Freedom, jazz and enterprise take centre stage in

Two Germans killed on Khao Lak died on a road that had already claimed foreign lives and seen carnage October 4, 2026 German couple killed at a Khao Lak crossing join a

Harrowing moments for husband in Chonburi who saw his wife killed by an angry elephant early Sunday October 4, 2026 Wild elephant pursues and kills Wanna Sridachama, 36,

Drunk driver mowed down a Thai woman and her German friend in Saturday’s early hours. Both died October 4, 2026 Double tragedy on Bangkok’s Thong Lor Road as Thai

Top anti corruption crusader arrested and charged by police in online gambling probe linked to boxing October 3, 2026 Thailand’s top crime fighter Atchariya is jailed

US raises the stakes on industrial capacity and transshipments posing trade barriers to Thai exports October 3, 2026 Bangkok’s US trade bargain faces a tariff

Counterfeiting racket selling on TikTok and Lazada busted in Samut Sakhon. Six foreigners arrested on site October 10, 2026

PM says he can explain. Denies power over impartial agencies as a no confidence motion is filed in House October 10, 2026

Murder in Trang over meth tablet dealing. Two men arrested after burned remains found near reservoir October 9, 2026

Commerce Minister says that a November signing of a US Thai trade deal is in sight as exporters stand by October 9, 2026

Armed police action in Nonthaburi as man wanted for attempted murder sought to evade an arrest warrant October 9, 2026

Thailand struggles economically even with revised World Bank GDP growth for 2026 coming in at 2% for 2026 October 8, 2026

New taxes simply for going in and out of Thailand in addition to higher airport tax already implemented October 8, 2026

Thaksin comes to Tax Court in Bangkok seeking temporary injunction to halt Revenue Department’s enforcement October 7, 2026

Senators from the ‘blue’ camp move against dissident Election Commissioner Sitthichot Intrawises October 6, 2026

Thai Airways defeats flood crisis but finds itself in a brewing crisis of confidence over its management October 5, 2026

Grab delivery driver strikes rich in Phuket by using trade to burgle 2 homes netting 3.69 million baht October 5, 2026

USS George HW Bush arrives in Phuket one day early and berths 3.3km offshore. Sailors landing ashore in holiday mode October 5, 2026

Police investigate a Burmese kingpin who entered Thailand by plane from India and had access to wealth October 4, 2026

Thai industrial base hammered by flooding crisis. Over 4k firms report a need for financial assistance October 4, 2026

House Committee chair Rome to call Bhumjaithai MP and Australian husband on Wednesday over wealth October 4, 2026

Two German tourists killed at Phang-nga zebra crossing. Pickup driver tore into them on Friday night October 3, 2026

Storm clouds gathering again as Thailand races to bolster its flood defences after last week’s deluge October 3, 2026

Bhumjaithai MP files police report against People’s Party’s Rangsiman Rome over scammer link remarks October 2, 2026

Thai Airways boss fired by the board chaired by Finance Ministry chief on Friday over baggage crisis October 2, 2026

Elderly woman seriously injured after an old man drove EV car at speed into a crowded Bangkok shrine October 2, 2026

Tuk Tuk driver in Phuket assaulted by Middle Eastern looking tourist who failed to pay his fare to a hotel October 2, 2026

Naturalised citizenship scrutinised as PM scraps Israeli’s Thai status over ongoing home passport use October 1, 2026

© 2026 Thai Examiner. All rights reserved.

2026年10月11日晚上10:58

在生活、媒体、政治、泰国

前总理他信·西那瓦因拖欠176亿泰铢税款，将于11月面临法庭对决。包括两辆防弹车在内的五辆豪车、银行存款和清迈土地可能被强制执行。与此同时，他著名的昌颂拉豪宅也可能成为目标。他信援引此前463.7亿泰铢的没收案，寻求法院颁布禁令。然而，前反腐调查员凯萨恩·阿提波提驳斥了他的辩护，并援引了最高法院的其他判决。目前银行账户中仅有9000万泰铢被冻结，除非他信获得法院保护或缴纳税款，否则税务部门可能会追查更多资产。

前总理他信·西那瓦面临176亿泰铢的税款债务，其五辆豪车也面临被扣押的风险。在法院判决前，他的Chan Song La豪宅也受到密切关注。（来源：暹罗快讯）

泰国前总理他信·西那瓦面临11月的关键法庭判决，泰国税务局正追讨其176亿泰铢的未缴税款。他的银行账户已被冻结，五辆豪车面临强制扣押，清迈的一块土地也成为税务局的目标。

与此同时，外界对他在曼谷著名的Chan Song La豪宅的命运猜测纷纷。他信希望获得禁令，阻止进一步的资产查封。然而，一位前反腐调查员援引最高法院的两项判决，对他的辩护提出质疑。除非他信获得保护或偿还债务，否则他剩余的更多财产可能面临强制执行。

中央税务法院于10月7日星期三审理了他信的禁令申请。这位前总理亲自出庭，并作证约两小时。他警告说，在他最新的法律挑战结束之前，继续强制执行禁令可能会造成严重损害。

他信寻求法院保护其防弹汽车，而税务官员则追查被冻结的账户和土地。

他尤其对丢失两辆用于个人安保的防弹车表示担忧。这两辆车都包含在已被采取强制回收措施的五辆豪车之中。

税务部门还冻结了约9000万泰铢的银行存款。此外，税务部门还查封了塔信及其妹妹在清迈共同拥有的土地。这些措施是根据最高法院2025年的最终裁决而采取的，该裁决维持了巨额税款评估。

因此，争议已超出最初的评估范围。眼下的问题是，在他信对强制执行程序提出质疑的同时，征收工作是否还能继续进行。

法院预计将于11月就他的禁令申请作出裁决。一些泰国媒体报道称裁决日期为11月16日，而另一些则称是11月26日。与此同时，税务部门已对该申请提出异议。

此外，如果法院批准临时保护令，该公司希望获得财务保障。经延期后，其正式答辩应于11月9日之前提交。后续程序定于12月21日举行，包括调解以及对争议问题和证据的审议。

Chan Song La 豪宅引发关注，Kaewsarn 否认对 Shin 股份重复查封的指控

对塔克信而言，面临的财务风险远不止已被冻结的资金。他的豪车、银行存款和清迈土地也都被冻结。此外，如果现有追回的资金不足以弥补损失，税务部门还可以追查其他合法资产。

这一可能性加剧了人们对他剩余财产的猜测，尤其是位于曼谷吞武里区的Chan Song La豪宅。然而，现有法院报告证实，该豪宅并未被查封或扣押。

这位前首相的律师正在质疑政府追回与新集团股份交易相关的资金的做法。他们坚称，政府此前已经没收了与同一交易相关的收益。

因此，他们质疑税务部门是否有权要求再次缴纳巨额税款。他们的论点再次引发了围绕2006年9月军事政变后启动的调查的争议。

然而，前反腐调查员凯萨恩·阿提波提驳斥了这种解释。凯萨恩曾任国家损害行为审查委员会委员。该委员会是在2006年他信在政变中被罢黜后成立的。

他坚持认为，最初的没收和目前的税款债务涉及不同的法律义务。前者涉及滥用职权所得的利益，而本案则涉及因股票交易产生的个人所得税。

尽管政变时期曾进行过调查，但最高法院仍根据司法调查结果没收了463.7亿泰铢。

因此，Kaewsarn认为，先前的没收不能自动免除后续的纳税义务。2010年2月26日，最高法院下令没收与他信旗下Shin Corporation公司相关的46,373,687,454.70泰铢资产。

这项裁决源于对其财务利益和总理任期内政府决策的调查。法院审查了与电信公司相关的利益以及影响该公司商业利益的决策。

值得注意的是，军方任命的调查委员会并未签发没收令。相反，最高法院政治职务持有者刑事庭审理了此案。法官们在作出裁决前审查了证据。

因此，凯萨恩认为，调查的军事渊源并不必然导致后续判决无效。委员会收集了证据，但法律后果由法院裁定。

他信的律师援引了俗称“毒树之果”的原则。这一论点质疑源自非法来源的证据或诉讼程序。在本案中，反对意见涉及在他信被罢免后，军政府发起的调查。

他的法律团队质疑政变后启动的诉讼程序的合法性。然而，凯萨恩坚称，调查委员会既没有认定他有罪，也没有下令最终没收财产。

Kaewsarn 指出另有税务判决，而他信则质疑没收财产的法律依据。

相反，证据在最高法院作出裁决前已经过司法程序。因此，凯萨恩反驳了调查起源导致没收无效的说法。尽管如此，他信的律师仍然坚持将最初的调查程序与后续税务判决的执行区分开来。这一区别仍然是围绕他资产的最新法律纠纷的核心。

这位前调查员还特别指出了2010年没收的具体金额。最高法院并没有没收与Shin Corporation交易相关的每一笔泰铢。

相反，法院认定约有463.7亿泰铢为与不法行为相关的利益。同时，根据法院裁决，约270亿泰铢已返还给受害者家属。其他资产，包括陈松罗住宅，则不在没收令的范围内。

因此，之前的诉讼并未剥夺他信的所有财产。本案涉及因出售信氏集团股份而产生的另一项税务责任。税务部门评估他信应缴纳约176亿泰铢的个人所得税。随后，最高法院税务庭于2025年维持了该评估。该判决为税务部门目前的征税工作提供了法律依据。

因此，他信面临的是最终判决的执行，而非尚未解决的行政评估。凯萨恩认为，这改变了纳税人的法律地位。一旦债务具有强制执行力，追讨范围就不一定局限于与原交易相关的资产。

前反腐调查员认为，税务部门可以追查其他资产来追回税款。

相反，税务部门可以追缴其他合法可用于抵偿欠款的财产。这包括与产生税款的交易无关的贵重资产。

这位前调查员用一个假设的土地交易案例来说明他的观点。假设有人出售土地赚取数百万泰铢，却未申报所得款项。如果未缴税款得到追缴，税务部门可以追查欠税人的车辆。

不一定非要从最初的土地出售中追回款项。同样，凯萨恩认为，他信的豪车和其他财产也可能成为税务执法的目标。

他坚称，最新措施与2010年的没收行动有着本质区别。之前的裁决涉及的是被认定为非法所得的资产。

相比之下，目前的措施旨在追缴最高法院维持原判的未缴税款。此外，没收非法所得并不必然等同于缴纳个人所得税。这两项判决源于不同的诉讼程序，并产生了不同的法律后果。

时机也至关重要。2025年的税务裁决是在最初没收财产约15年后作出的。因此，在税务纠纷结束时，之前的判决已经成为法律史的一部分。尽管如此，他信的律师坚持认为，目前的诉讼程序涉及的是强制执行，而非税务评估的有效性。他们立即提出的申请旨在寻求暂时保护，以阻止进一步的征收措施。

他信警告称，防弹车辆的损失威胁到他的安全，因为税务部门反对提供救济。

与此同时，他信也十分重视其特制防弹车辆。在10月7日的庭审中，他告诉法庭，五辆受影响的车辆中有两辆是防弹车，并且都采用了特制防弹玻璃。

他列举了此前的暗杀未遂事件以及对自身安全的持续担忧。此外，他信还辩称，更换车辆需要相当长的时间，这可能会使他面临危险。

该项主张是他申请临时保护令的一部分。然而，税务部门反对任何暂停执行令的请求。相反，税务部门要求他提供财务担保，法院才会颁布禁令。这可能对塔克信提出另一项实质性要求。

他的律师温亚特·查特蒙特里（Winyat Chatmontri）传唤了一名前税务部门官员作为证人。与此同时，两名税务征收官员代表税务部门出庭作证。

听证会审查了在最新挑战结束前继续执法可能带来的后果。他信表示担忧，受影响的资产可能在法院作出最终裁决前被拍卖。因此，禁令可能会决定税务部门是否会继续推进出售已被强制执行的财产。每项资产的具体法律地位仍然至关重要，尤其是豪华车辆。

劳斯莱斯和双色迈巴赫引发关注，五辆汽车面临处罚，引发诸多疑问。

他信于 10 月 7 日乘坐一辆车牌号为 PJ 195 的黑色劳斯莱斯抵达听证会现场。他还拥有一辆独特的双色梅赛德斯-迈巴赫豪华轿车。

然而，现有的法庭记录并未明确指出哪两辆车是防弹车，也没有确定庭审中使用的劳斯莱斯是否在五辆受影响的车辆之列。同样，那辆双色迈巴赫的防弹状态也尚未得到确认。

目前已确定，五辆豪华车辆已被采取征收措施。其中两辆配备了特殊的防弹装置。然而，扣押或查封并不意味着可以立即进行拍卖。税务部门在出售这些车辆之前，可能还需要采取进一步的法律步骤。因此，禁令的裁决可能会对这些车辆的未来产生直接影响。

另一方面，人们的注意力转向了与这位前总理相关的其他贵重财产。其中最引人注目的是他位于曼谷的著名住所——占颂拉别墅。这座位于吞武里区的豪宅长期以来一直是他的家族住宅和政治集会场所，至今仍是与他信联系最紧密的房产之一。因此，随着税务征收工作的推进，关于该房产可能被没收的猜测也愈演愈烈。

税务官员正在评估陈松罗宅邸的资产和未偿债务，目前尚未确认是否已查封该宅。

然而，现有报道并未证实税务部门已查封该豪宅。也没有任何证据表明已对该房产进行登记扣押或安排拍卖。因此，其法律地位与已受影响的银行存款、豪车和清迈土地有所不同。关键问题在于所有权，以及他信是否拥有可供强制执行的合法权益。

如果塔信拥有可识别的权益，该权益可能与未来的追偿程序相关。但是，如果权益归属于其他家庭成员或法人实体，则会引发额外的法律问题。

税务部门需要确凿的依据才能追查此类资产。因此，目前关于这栋豪宅的猜测不能被视为即将被查封的证据。然而，未偿债务使得他信的其他财产越来越具有现实意义。

该部门已冻结约9000万泰铢的银行存款。但这仅占追讨金额176亿泰铢的一小部分。即使全部追回这些存款，仍有约175.1亿泰铢的款项尚未收回。与此同时，五辆汽车和清迈土地的总价值尚未确定。因此，目前尚无确切的资产总额可用于偿还判决款项。

Kaewsarn呼吁对Thaksin的财富进行更广泛的追踪，包括可能在英国持有的房产。

如果这些资产不足以偿还债务，可能需要采取进一步的追缴措施。凯萨恩敦促税务部门调查这位前总理的剩余财富。他援引《福布斯》的估计，称他信的财富超过725亿泰铢。然而，已公布的财富估算并不能确定计算中所包含的每一项资产的所有权，也不能证明所有这些财产都可以被扣押以偿还个人税款债务。

个人资产的合法所有权仍然至关重要。然而，凯萨恩认为，该部门应该开展全面的资产追踪工作。他指出，海外资产可能是调查的一个方向。

他特别提到了英国的昂贵住宅。他建议，法律合作安排有助于确定可能可以追回的财产。

然而，此类行动取决于适用的法律以及相关司法管辖区之间的合作。所提供的材料并未指明与当前税务诉讼相关的已确认的海外扣押行为，也未证实英国境内的特定房产可合法用于偿还他信的债务。因此，这些建议涉及潜在的调查行动，而非已确认的强制执行行动。

关于税务债务强制执行的讨论中，可能出现的家族资产转移和防弹车辆拍卖等问题浮出水面。

凯萨恩还提出，可能需要审查向亲属转移资金的情况。他指的是涉及本票和其他金融安排的交易。这类票据可以记录当事人之间的债务或财务义务。

然而，这些资产的存在本身并不能证明存在不当行为。凯萨恩关注的是，这些转移是否意在使资产脱离债权人的追索。

他认为，如果确有欺诈性转移，税务部门可以考虑提起法律诉讼。这可能包括寻求取消旨在阻挠追缴的交易。然而，所提供的材料并未证实他信存在欺诈性资产转移。这些建议涉及可能的调查行动，而非已证实的违法行为。

此外，凯萨恩对防弹车辆问题持坚定立场。他认为，车辆的防护装备不应自动使其免受执法。相反，他希望税务部门对合法可用于偿还判决的资产进行追缴。他甚至提议出售这些车辆，并将所得款项用于修建防洪蓄水池。然而，这只是他个人的建议，并非政府已公布的计划。

任何最终的拍卖仍须遵守适用的强制执行程序。法院还必须裁定他信是否符合临时保护的条件。这一裁定目前是争议的焦点。税务部门已获得最高法院的最终判决支持其主张。与此同时，他信正试图暂停征收税款，并对强制执行程序提出质疑。

法院权衡禁令及可能的财务保障，两项最高法院裁决影响着这场争议

法院可以批准禁令，也可以驳回禁令，或者附加条件。其中一个可能的条件是提供财务担保。鉴于债务规模，这项要求本身可能意义重大。然而，禁令并不能免除相关的税务责任。

它只会限制在法院规定的范围内执行。反之，拒绝执行并不意味着可以自动扣押与他信有关的所有财产。

税务部门仍需遵守相关法律程序。所有权和可执行性对每项资产而言仍然至关重要。与此同时，此前的没收事件仍然是法律争论的焦点。他信的律师坚持认为，政府此前已没收了与同一交易相关的收益。他们还质疑2006年政变后展开的调查的缘由。

然而，凯萨恩指出最高法院在后续的没收案判决中发挥了重要作用。他认为，最初的调查和最终的司法裁决不能简单地视为同一事件。2010年的判决根据有关利用政治职务获取利益的调查结果，没收了约463.7亿泰铢。此外，2025年的判决维持了约176亿泰铢的个人所得税评估。

他信将面临进一步的追缴行动，税务部门将根据最终税款判决寻求付款。

因此，这两项裁决涉及不同的法律后果。此外，早前的没收并未完全剥夺他信的剩余财富。约270亿泰铢已归还给其家族，而其他财产则未受影响。

这其中包括陈松罗，如今它再次成为人们关注的焦点。税务部门目前的任务是通过合法途径追回未缴税款。

然而，目前银行账户中冻结的金额远低于所要求的数额。因此，税务部门已对车辆和土地采取了行动。如果现有资产不足以偿还债务，则可能采取进一步的强制措施。对于他信而言，后果日益直接。他面临着数十亿泰铢的债务、被冻结的存款以及被强制执行的贵重个人财产。

他的两辆防弹车也成为他寻求保护的关键所在。与此同时，他位于曼谷的著名住所的法律地位仍未得到确认。尽管外界对其未来命运有所猜测，但目前尚未有任何针对Chan Song La的查封行动。然而，如果采取进一步的追偿行动，任何合法归他信所有的财产都可能成为相关因素。

这位前总理现在必须等待中央税务法院对其禁令申请的裁决。税务部门应于11月9日前提交正式答辩状。一些报道称裁决将于11月16日公布，但也有一些报道称裁决日期为11月26日。进一步的实质性审理程序定于12月21日进行。

11月的禁令裁决可能决定是否对塔克信的资产采取强制执行措施。

在此之前，他信的最新法律挑战仍未得到解决。然而，最高法院2025年的税务判决仍然有效。税务部门已对他信的银行存款、五辆豪车和清迈土地采取了行动。眼下的问题是，法院是否会下令暂时停止这些强制执行措施。

如果塔克信未能获得保护，司法部可以继续对合法资产采取追偿措施。如果他无法履行判决，更多财产可能面临审查。

目前，他名下的豪车和现有资产扣押构成了直接的财务风险。与此同时，尽管外界对其未来走向有所猜测，但陈松罗目前仍未被列入已确认的强制执行措施名单。

因此，这位前总理的下一次法庭裁决将产生远超最初Shin集团交易的影响。除非法院介入，否则他176亿泰铢的税款债务仍可强制执行。目前仅有9000万泰铢的银行存款被冻结，税务部门仍面临巨大的追缴任务。与此同时，他信必须寻求临时保护，否则其剩余的合法资产将面临持续的强制执行。

前总理在曼谷税务法庭寻求临时禁令，以阻止税务部门的执法行动。

他信寻求法院颁布禁令，阻止税务部门在2025年8月追缴170亿比索的税款判决。

他信摘除电子手环后重获自由。计划于六月底飞往迪拜会见英拉。

他信目前面临最新的法律和财务困境，税务部门威胁要因其欠税而使其破产。

新联合政府突然撤回对宪章运动的支持，表明其已面临巨大压力。

前总理他信获皇家特赦，重获完全自由，庆祝女王生日

政治形势虽已发生变化，但他信仍面临包括170亿泰铢税款债务在内的法律问题。

一位老人前来汇报假释情况。这位前总理乘坐梅赛德斯-迈巴赫前往曼谷当地缓刑办公室报到。

前总理他信周一获释，支持者和红衫军已对此表示庆祝，因为他获得了假释。

约瑟夫·安东尼是一位来自爱尔兰的侨民，过去十年一直居住在泰国。他曾在爱尔兰和泰国的媒体行业担任过编辑职务，拥有丰富的媒体从业经验。他主要关注泰国的经济和商业新闻，以及侨民的生活方式。

约瑟夫·奥康纳的所有帖子

2026年10月10日，曼谷警方周六突击搜查多处房产，逮捕11名与涉嫌犯罪活动有关联的外国人。警方突击搜查了曼谷的豪华住宅区，目标是……

缅甸毒枭，拥有多个身份和多条人命，与2026年10月10日清莱发生的巨额现金查获案有关。2022年死亡。2026年在韩国被捕。Noo

泰国震惊于一名母亲被强行送往如同监狱般的养老院，院内床位如同笼子一般，病人被关在笼子里。2026年10月9日，警方调查这起家庭噩梦：63岁的帕特母亲被强行送往养老院，院内床位如同笼子。

2026年10月9日，一名51岁的法国男子在清迈因通过代理公司经营旅游旅馆被捕。警方突袭清迈一家旅馆后，该法国男子被捕。

泰国王后成为首位驾驶瑞典鹰狮战斗机的泰国女性。国王于2026年10月9日前往素叻他尼府祝贺她。从波音喷气式飞机到超音速战斗机：王后

2026年10月8日，司法部长和其他内阁成员突击搜查曼谷的犹太中心，财务案件不断扩大。一家位于曼谷的小型办公室注册在六个实体名下，涉案金额达61美元。

一家与政府议员丈夫有关联的海外持牌在线赌博网站引发法律难题 2026年10月8日 一场19亿泰铢的财富纠纷或将席卷整个行业

2026年10月7日，北碧府一家恐怖的护理中心被关闭，该中心曾将病人锁在笼状床铺和牢房中。照片显示，该中心内有钢笼床、铁栅栏房间和精神病患者。

泰铢450泰铢的新旅游税计划在获得内阁批准后，于2027年初正式实施，距离实施又近了一步。2026年10月7日，外国游客将面临450泰铢的入境费。

反腐败和打击犯罪斗士阿查里亚（Atchariya）因网络犯罪被法院拒绝保释，于2026年10月5日被送往曼谷拘留监狱。

越南经济增长速度超过泰国，有望在2029年净GDP超过泰国（2026年10月5日）。泰国的经济领先地位正面临压力。

上周末，美国在呵叻府举办了一场由美国驻泰国大使奥尼尔主持的乡村集市演出，以此拉近了与泰国民众的距离。2026年10月5日，自由、爵士乐和创业精神成为焦点。

2026年10月4日，两名德国人在考拉遇难，他们死于一条此前已夺走多条外国人生命并造成惨重伤亡的道路上。这对德国夫妇在考拉的一个过境点被撞身亡。

2026年10月4日星期日清晨，春武里府一名丈夫亲眼目睹妻子被愤怒的大象咬死，经历了令人痛心的时刻。野生大象追逐并杀死了36岁的Wanna Sridachama。

周六凌晨，一名醉酒司机驾车撞倒了一名泰国女子和她的德国朋友。两人于2026年10月4日在曼谷通罗路不幸身亡。

泰国顶级反腐斗士因涉嫌参与与拳击相关的网络赌博案被警方逮捕并起诉 2026年10月3日 泰国顶级反腐斗士阿查里亚被判入狱

美国提高工业产能和转运方面的门槛，对泰国出口设置贸易壁垒 2026年10月3日 曼谷与美国达成的贸易协议面临关税威胁

沙没沙空府警方捣毁了一个在TikTok和Lazada上销售假冒商品的团伙。2026年10月10日，六名外国人在现场被捕。

首相表示他可以解释。他否认对公正机构拥有权力，此前众议院于2026年10月10日提交了不信任动议。

董里府因冰毒片剂交易发生谋杀案。2026年10月9日，两名男子在水库附近发现被焚烧的尸体后被捕。

商务部长表示，美泰贸易协议有望在11月签署，出口商已做好准备。（2026年10月9日）

2026年10月9日，暖武里府警方对一名因涉嫌谋杀未遂而被通缉的男子采取武装行动，该男子试图逃避逮捕令。

即使世界银行将泰国2026年的GDP增长率修正为2%，泰国经济依然举步维艰。（2026年10月8日）

除了已经实施的更高机场税之外，泰国还将对进出境征收新的税费，该税项已于2026年10月8日生效。

他信于2026年10月7日向曼谷税务法庭申请临时禁令，以阻止税务部门的执法行动。

来自“蓝营”的参议员们对持不同政见的选举专员西提乔特·因特拉怀斯采取行动 2026年10月6日

泰国航空克服了洪灾危机，但却发现自己正面临着管理层信任危机（2026年10月5日）

2026年10月5日，一名Grab外卖员在普吉岛利用行窃机会入室盗窃两户人家，共盗走369万泰铢。

“乔治·H·W·布什”号航空母舰提前一天抵达普吉岛，停泊在离岸3.3公里处。水兵们于2026年10月5日以度假模式上岸。

警方正在调查一名缅甸黑帮头目，他于2026年10月4日从印度乘飞机进入泰国，并拥有雄厚的财力。

泰国工业基础遭受洪灾重创。超过4000家企业表示需要财政援助。（2026年10月4日）

众议院委员会主席罗姆将于2026年10月4日星期三致电泰国议员布姆贾伊泰及其澳大利亚籍丈夫，讨论财富问题。

两名德国游客在攀牙府斑马线被撞身亡。2026年10月3日星期五晚，一辆皮卡车撞向他们。

上周泰国遭遇洪灾后，暴雨云团再次聚集，泰国正加紧加强防洪措施。（2026年10月3日）

泰自豪党议员就人民党议员兰西曼·罗姆涉嫌诈骗言论向警方报案 2026年10月2日

泰国航空公司首席执行官因行李危机于2026年10月2日（星期五）被财政部长主持的董事会解雇。

2026年10月2日，一名老人驾驶电动汽车高速冲入曼谷一座拥挤的寺庙，导致一名老妇重伤。

2026年10月2日，普吉岛一名嘟嘟车司机因未支付前往酒店的车费而被一名看起来像中东人的游客殴打。

2026年10月1日，总理因以色列人持续使用本国护照而取消其泰国公民身份，入籍公民身份受到审查。

© 2026 Thai Examiner。版权所有。