Judge hails amicable end as Lee Zii Jia, father, siblings move past management dispute

The legal dispute involving professional men's singles shuttler Lee Zii Jia against his company, LZJ Management Sdn Bhd, and family members was amicably resolved at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur.

The settlement, confirmed by all parties, mandates an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of LZJ Management on October 31, with restrictions on the financial actions of Zii Jia's father and sister pending the meeting.

Judge Leong Wai Hong acknowledged the peaceful resolution, emphasizing the settlement is beneficial for all parties involved.

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 20 — The lawsuit filed by professional men’s singles shuttler Lee Zii Jia against his company, LZJ Management Sdn Bhd, and his family was resolved amicably at the High Court here today.

Zii Jia, 28, filed the originating summons against LZJ Management, his father Lee Chee Hin, 59, his sister Zii Yii, 30, and his younger brother Tao, 25, over the company’s management and finances.

Zii Jia’s counsel Ahmad Zayd Ahmad Zuber informed Judge Leong Wai Hong that the parties had reached a settlement and applied for the court to record a consent judgment on the agreed terms.

Reading from the draft consent, Ahmad Zayd said the parties had agreed that an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the first respondent (LZJ Management) would be held on October 31, in accordance with the Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting dated October 16, with the costs to be borne by the first respondent.

“Pending the disposal of the EGM, the second and third respondents (Chee Hin and Zii Yii), whether personally, through agents or through any party acting on their behalf, are restrained from approving, paying, disbursing or causing the payment of director’s fees, allowances, bonuses, remuneration or financial benefits (save for monthly salaries, calculated with effect from September 1) to themselves from the first respondent,” he said.

Ahmad Zayd said the second and third respondents are restrained from approving, signing or ratifying any board of directors’ resolution or company resolution, without the court’s leave, save that no order was made as to costs.

Specifically, this covers any resolution relating to the appointment or removal of directors, the appointment of a company secretary, the disposal of material assets, the issuance of new shares, any change in shareholding structure, or any decision affecting the management, administration or control of the first respondent.

After counsel read out the draft consent, Judge Leong asked Zii Jia to come forward to confirm the terms of the settlement.

“Although he is well known, we still need to check his MyKad and verify whether he is the same person,” said the judge, drawing laughter from the media and members of the public present in court.

Judge Leong: Do you agree to the terms of the settlement?

Zii Jia: Yes, I agree.

The judge then called Chee Hin and Tao to confirm the terms of the settlement, and both respondents stated that they agreed to the terms. Their counsel, Andrian Ng Chen Yip, informed the court that his other client, Zii Yii, was abroad and had also agreed to the order.

“Thank you to the parties for resolving this case amicably. This is good for all parties, and everyone can move on with their lives,” said Judge Leong.

In today’s proceedings, counsel Samantha Cheng appeared for LZJ Management.

In the originating summons filed on July 2, Zii Jia, who is the majority shareholder of LZJ Management, said he had taken steps to convene an EGM to discuss the management and governance of the company, but had not succeeded in doing so.

Zii Jia holds a 90 per cent stake in the company, while Zii Yii holds nine per cent and Tao one per cent.

The applicant therefore sought an order that the EGM be held within 14 days of the date of the court order and that the meeting proceed notwithstanding the absence of, or refusal to attend by, any member, director or company secretary. — Bernama

Maddison wonder strike sparks Spurs’ first Premier League win in 17 months

Ronaldo hit with 30‑day ban after storming out of Portugal camp

One last ride! LeBron begins record 24th NBA season with Sixers chasing fifth ring

States urged to gazette over 15,000ha of public open spaces in Peninsular Malaysia, FT

MARA says all 242 sponsored students in France safe amid unrest

Queen calls for long-term measures to protect students from haze

男子单打羽毛球职业选手李梓嘉与其公司 LZJ Management Sdn Bhd 及家人之间的法律纠纷在吉隆坡高等法院得到友好解决。

经各方确认，该和解协议规定，LZJ Management 将于 10 月 31 日召开特别股东大会 (EGM)，在会议召开之前，对 Zii Jia 的父亲和姐姐的财务行为进行限制。

梁伟鸿法官对和平解决表示赞赏，并强调该和解方案对所有相关方都有利。

吉隆坡，10 月 20 日讯——职业男子单打羽毛球运动员李梓嘉起诉其公司 LZJ Management Sdn Bhd 及其家人的案件，今天在吉隆坡高等法院得到友好解决。

28 岁的 Zii Jia 向 LZJ 管理公司、他 59 岁的父亲 Lee Chee Hin、他 30 岁的姐姐 Zii Yii 和他 25 岁的弟弟 Tao 提起诉讼，指控该公司存在管理和财务问题。

Zii Jia 的律师 Ahmad Zayd Ahmad Zuber 告知法官 Leong Wai Hong，双方已达成和解，并申请法院记录一份关于双方同意条款的同意判决。

艾哈迈德·扎伊德宣读了同意书草案，称双方已同意，根据 10 月 16 日发布的特别股东大会通知，第一被告（LZJ Management）将于 10 月 31 日召开特别股东大会，费用由第一被告承担。

“在特别股东大会决议通过之前，第二和第三答辩人（Chee Hin 和 Zii Yii）无论是亲自、通过代理人还是通过任何代表他们行事的第三方，均不得批准、支付、拨付或促使第一答辩人向其支付董事费、津贴、奖金、报酬或经济利益（月薪除外，月薪自 9 月 1 日起计算）。”他说道。

艾哈迈德·扎伊德表示，第二和第三被告未经法院许可不得批准、签署或追认任何董事会决议或公司决议，但法院并未就诉讼费用作出任何命令。

具体而言，这涵盖与董事的任命或罢免、公司秘书的任命、重大资产的处置、新股的发行、股权结构的任何变更，或任何影响第一被告的管理、行政或控制的决定相关的任何决议。

律师宣读完同意书草案后，梁法官要求子佳上前确认和解条款。

“虽然他很有名，但我们仍然需要核查他的身份证，确认他是否是同一个人，”法官说道，引得在场的媒体和公众一阵哄笑。

梁法官：你是否同意和解条款？

子佳：是的，我同意。

法官随后传唤了谢欣和陶，以确认和解条款，两名被告均表示同意这些条款。他们的律师吴振业告知法庭，他的另一位委托人子怡身在国外，也已同意该项裁决。

“感谢各方友好解决此案。这对各方都有好处，大家都可以继续各自的生活了。”梁法官说道。

在今天的庭审中，律师 Samantha Cheng 代表 LZJ Management 出庭。

在 7 月 2 日提交的起诉状中，LZJ Management 的大股东 Zii Jia 表示，他已采取措施召开特别股东大会，讨论公司的管理和治理，但未能成功。

Zii Jia持有该公司90%的股份，Zii Yii持有9%的股份，Tao持有1%的股份。

因此，申请人请求法院下令，特别股东大会必须在法院命令下达之日起14天内召开，并且即使任何成员、董事或公司秘书缺席或拒绝出席，会议也必须照常进行。——马新社

麦迪逊的精彩进球帮助热刺取得了17个月以来的首场英超胜利

C罗因愤然离开葡萄牙国家队而被禁赛30天

最后一搏！勒布朗开启他创纪录的第24个NBA赛季，76人队将向第五枚总冠军戒指发起冲击。

英国《金融时报》敦促各州将马来西亚半岛超过15000公顷的公共开放空间列入保护名录。

MARA表示，尽管法国局势动荡，其资助的242名在法国的学生均安全无恙。

女王呼吁采取长期措施保护学生免受雾霾影响