People don’t just distrust ChatGPT. They judge the person who uses it人们不仅不信任 ChatGPT，还会对使用它的人做出评判。
Eight studies found that people judge technology-assisted advice seekers as colder, with implications for hiring, feedback, and workplace adoption.
Across the board, when a person consulted AI instead of a human expert, they were dehumanised more. — Unsplash
Imagine the following scenario: A university student needs a reading list for an essay on primitive art. In one version of the story, he asks a professor. In another, he asks ChatGPT. He then plans to gather public feedback through short surveys, all unpaid, and strangers are asked how many they would fill out.
People who were told the reading list came from a professor were more likely to sign up for the survey. The student, the essay and the request were identical, and he lost about one survey’s worth of goodwill because of where his reading list came from.
US state attorney general sues ChatGPT founders over child safety
US states sue OpenAI, saying its popular chatbot is hurting children and deceiving adults
Opinion: Why my conversations with ‘ChatGPT for Teens’ made me very worried
Thank you for your report!
India’s Eternal unveils AI assistant built for privacy
Nvidia boss criticises 'cheap' AI doomsday warnings
Websites down: what is PHP and how has it raised AI hacking fears?
总体而言，当人们咨询人工智能而非人类专家时，他们更容易被非人化。—— Unsplash
想象一下这样的场景：一位大学生需要一份关于原始艺术的论文阅读清单。在其中一个版本中，他向一位教授寻求帮助；在另一个版本中，他则向 ChatGPT 寻求帮助。之后，他计划通过简短的免费调查收集公众反馈，并询问陌生人愿意填写多少份问卷。
那些被告知阅读清单来自教授的人更有可能参与调查。学生本人、论文和调查请求都完全相同，但他仅仅因为阅读清单的来源而损失了相当于一份调查问卷的好感度。
美国州检察长就儿童安全问题起诉 ChatGPT 创始人。
美国各州起诉OpenAI，称其广受欢迎的聊天机器人正在伤害儿童并欺骗成年人。
观点：为什么我与“ChatGPT for Teens”的对话让我非常担忧
感谢您的报告！
印度公司 Eternal 推出专为隐私保护而打造的 AI 助手
英伟达老板批评“廉价”人工智能末日预言
网站宕机：PHP是什么？它又是如何引发人们对人工智能黑客攻击的担忧的？