← 返回新闻首页
国际综合主流

Is Fox News pivoting to its post-Trump era? The answer lies in what it is — and isn’t — showing

President Trump is “dominating the airwaves and controlling the conversation,” Fox host Jesse Watters declared on October 21, touting the president’s midterm blitz. Trump was speaking in South Carolina at that same moment. Fox didn’t carry any of it live.

CNNBrian Stelter, Andrew Kirell查看原文 ↗
福克斯新闻是否正在向后特朗普时代转型?答案就在于它正在播出什么,以及没有播出什么。

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

President Donald Trump is “dominating the airwaves and controlling the conversation,” Fox News host Jesse Watters declared on October 21, touting the president’s midterm campaign blitz.

Trump was speaking in South Carolina at that same moment. Fox didn’t carry any of it live.

As Republicans fight to retain control of Congress, the party’s most powerful television ally has been making its own choices about what the closing message should be — cheering Trump’s campaigning while frequently avoiding his speeches.

The Murdochs are thinking about a post-Trump era and looking ahead to the 2028 presidential election — believing the network will be center stage as both the Republicans and Democrats choose nominees.

But right now, Fox’s ratings are down, and its defenses are up. The country’s dominant conservative network is a reflection of Republican malaise amid a midterm season that has given the party little to cheer about. Several of its hosts sound not just determined, but downright desperate to juice GOP turnout.

Some Trump fans have literally tuned it all out. Normally cable news ratings surge during an election season, but Fox’s total audience fell about 27% in October compared with the same month a year ago.

The Hollywood Reporter called it the steepest decline suffered by any cable news network in the run-up to an election in the past decade. The Bulwark’s culture editor Sonny Bunch said in response, “This is probably more revealing of GOP enthusiasm than every poll released thus far.”

Fox still commands a huge audience, however, including many voters who identify as independents and liberals. That’s partly why Democrats like Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed have popped up on Fox’s air in recent weeks, courting voters who are disappointed by Trump and willing to consider a Democrat.

Trump, in turn, has railed against Fox when he has seen Democrats on the network that he considers his own. Right now Fox’s profitable but difficult alliance with Trump is being tested like never before.

The change in Fox’s appetite for Trump’s speeches is striking. From January through September, Trump delivered 14 campaign-style rally speeches, and Fox News took 12 of them live, a CNN analysis finds.

In fact, the network was so eager to show the president speaking that when Trump briefly handed the microphone to a few members of Congress during a July 27 rally in Michigan, host Brian Kilmeade assured viewers that Fox’s cutaway would be brief.

“We’ll bring you back there live when he starts speaking again,” he said, “and we won’t have you miss any of the action.”

During Trump’s fall midterm blitz, however, Fox viewers have missed a lot of Trump action, so to speak. The network aired live portions of just nine of his 24 speeches, according to CNN’s tally through Wednesday night.

In early October, Fox routinely ignored Trump’s live events and showed only short clips of the speeches afterward. This approach continued until late in the month, when Fox began to dip into the president’s speeches with some regularity.

The bulk of the rally airtime has been during the network’s weekend programming, which is lower-rated than weekday commentary shows like “The Five” and “Jesse Watters Primetime.” Fox has appeared loath to interrupt its most popular shows for Trump, particularly when he is just repeating his stump speech. (Fox has live-streamed every rally online.)

Even Newsmax, Fox’s far-less-popular rival for MAGA viewership, has dialed back on airing Trump’s rallies compared with earlier this year, often airing just a few minutes before directing viewers to its paid app for the rest, CNN analysis found.

“I hate to do this. I hate interrupting the president,” Newsmax host Greg Kelly said while cutting away from Trump’s October 1 rally after about three minutes. He promised to watch the rest later — “You always learn things” — but explained: “We have some other content that we have to get through.”

The slow backing away from Trump’s rallies comes as he registers some of the weakest approval ratings of his presidency and seeks to preserve Republican congressional majorities that are threatened in part by his own unpopularity. (Earlier this month, Fox’s own polling unit put Trump’s job approval at 36%, a record low in the network’s polling.)

Trump’s long, meandering speeches ostensibly promote GOP candidates, but can veer into extended airings of personal grievances, sales pitches for expensive White House renovations and all-too-frequent observations about the male physique .

Meanwhile, Fox’s hosts can offer a more focused Republican pitch, and that’s exactly what they do. Hour after hour, hosts and guests decry the Democratic Party and denounce socialism. In recent days, they have stoked fear about riots in France spreading stateside and summoned outrage over Barack Obama’s supposed snobbery toward the Cheesecake Factory.

Watters remarked earlier this month that “fear porn” is necessary to motivate voters: “You have to say ‘These people will take your health care. They’re going to let in the third world. They’re going to jack up your taxes.’ And that’s what’s going to get people to come out to vote. You have to say, ‘These people are scary and dangerous. You know what we’re all about.’ And that’s really a choice.”

On Wednesday night, though, Watters let Trump do most of the talking. The president’s Ohio speech ran uninterrupted for almost the entire hour.

From a business standpoint, Fox News is the envy of the cable television universe. The network commands a large and loyal audience and ranks as the top-rated channel across all of cable in prime time, easily outrating CNN and MS NOW.

But Fox’s ratings have sagged sharply this fall. Some might see it as a bit of political foreshadowing. If next week is an electoral earthquake, Fox’s ratings are a foreshock, signaling what may be coming.

October was Fox’s lowest-rated month since December 2023. The year-over-year audience decline suggests that “conservatives are tuning out ahead of the high-stakes elections,” as Oliver Darcy wrote for Status earlier this week.

Nielsen’s recent methodology changes may also explain the decline, though CNN and MS NOW posted year-over-year gains in October, likely driven by election-season interest.

Fox is used to seeing viewer mood swings show up in the ratings. In 2020, when Trump allies attacked Fox for accurately reporting that he had lost to Joe Biden, Fox’s ratings dropped precipitously. The ratings pressure was on the minds of some Fox hosts and producers who subsequently platformed Trump’s election lies, leading to multiple defamation lawsuits.

That 2020 ratings decline was an election aftershock. The Fox base slowly but surely tuned back in over time. But at the moment, Trump fatigue is taking a real toll on Fox’s ratings, and thus its bottom line.

Some Democrats running in red and purple states have seen Fox as a useful platform to campaign.

David Jolly, the Democratic candidate for governor in Florida, gave an interview to Fox’s Bill Hemmer and Dana Perino earlier this week, recognizing the network’s large audience across the state. Jolly shared the interview on social media afterward and thanked the hosts for the invitation.

El-Sayed and Kentucky Senate Democratic candidate Charles Booker have also appeared on the network recently.

But for every Democrat who has said yes to a Fox interview, many have said no, reflecting the party’s split over whether to treat the network as an opponent or an opportunity.

Trump and some of his aides have bristled at El-Sayed’s visibility on Fox. The president railed against host Martha MacCallum’s “softball” interview with El-Sayed earlier this month.

Then he attacked Fox for giving airtime to the independent candidate challenging Nebraska’s Republican Senate incumbent. “Fox News is long form interviewing the sleazebag, Dan Osborn, right now, who is running against our GREAT Republican Senator, Pete Ricketts, from Nebraska,” the president wrote. “Why are they doing this???”

The network rarely talks about its coverage choices and avoids responding to the president’s missives. But Fox News president Jay Wallace, during an unrelated interview with Axios, alluded to Trump’s anger about El-Sayed and said, “Someone didn’t necessarily like that. But that’s what we do.”

Jessica Koscielniak/Reuters

Fox News is tuning out Trump’s rallies. Here’s what that means

Wallace’s rebuttal is obvious: Fox’s news programs are supposed to cover all the news, not just GOP views, even though the network is largely defined by pro-Trump opinion shows that repeat the GOP party line.

Even those opinion shows can contain surprising moments. A new El-Sayed campaign ad features Watters and other Fox figures making flattering remarks about the Democratic candidate and skeptical remarks about Mike Rogers, the Trump-backed Republican in the race.

Meanwhile, Trump remains dependent on Fox to reach the voter base he shares with the network. The relationship is likely to remain awkward. Trump has signaled that he might scapegoat Fox for Republican losses next week.

“Fox News is spending far too much time putting on the OPPONENTS of Republican party candidates,” he complained over the weekend.

Trump claimed that Fox’s lack of “help” is “the only reason this race is close, if it is indeed close.”

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻