← 返回新闻首页
新加坡主流

Singapore lets artists express concern for global conflicts, but content cannot provoke unrest

Singapore allows artistic expression on global conflicts within limits to protect public order and national security, with approved performances cited. Read more at straitstimes.com.

The Straits TimesKenny Chee查看原文 ↗
新加坡允许艺术家表达对全球冲突的关切,但作品内容不得引发动乱。

Robert Del Naja and Grant Marshall from Massive Attack stand with a Palestinian flag onstage at the end of their performance in Singapore on July 29, in this screengrab from video obtained from social media.

Published Sep 10, 2026, 02:57 PM

Updated Sep 10, 2026, 03:01 PM

The Singapore Government allows artists to express humanitarian concerns about global conflicts but says such expressions must not threaten public order or national security.

Several performances addressing conflicts like Israel-Gaza and themes of genocide have been approved under licensing rules and content ratings by IMDA.

Artists, both local and foreign, must comply with Singapore laws and licensing conditions; early engagement with IMDA is encouraged for clarity on acceptable content.

SINGAPORE - The Singapore Government recognises the humanitarian impact of global conflicts and does not prohibit artists from expressing concern for those who are affected, said Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Tan Kiat How.

This is provided their content does not undermine public order, national security or stability in Singapore, he said on Sept 10 in Parliament.

Approvals had been given for several performances that feature such causes, including those covering the Israel-Gaza conflict and which explore themes of genocide, he added.

Tan was replying a question from Hazlina Abdul Halim (East Coast GRC) on how the Government assesses artists’ conduct on international conflicts.

Her question comes after two members of British trip-hop band Massive Attack were issued warnings by the police and banned from re-entering Singapore. They had displayed a Palestinian flag at their concert here on July 29, with one of them shouting “Free Palestine”.

The entry ban also means that the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) will not grant any future application for performances by the band.

Elaborating, Tan said that local and foreign artists performing here are expected to comply with Singapore’s laws and the conditions of their licence during their events.

The condition that artistic expression should not undermine public order here is made clear in IMDA’s Arts Entertainment Classification Code that all licensees must comply with. The code classifies arts entertainment according to their suitability for different age groups, covering plays, stand-up comedies, art exhibitions and literary readings, dance performances, and music performances like variety shows and concerts.

Besides the intent of the actions, IMDA will also consider the likely impact of their performance to assess if the conditions are met, Tan added.

“Moreover, Singapore should not be used by foreigners as a platform to further political causes, including those relating to conflicts or political issues overseas,” he said.

In follow-up queries, Hazlina asked Tan if there was an example of a performance by an international artist with a social cause that was allowed here.

She also asked whether any changes were made after Massive Attack’s actions and in the lead up to an upcoming November concert by Guns N’ Roses, a band known for displaying a Ukrainian flag during one of its songs.

Tan cited three performances that were allowed here. In May, R18 event To The Unforgotten was organised to celebrate humanity and offer solidarity to various groups around the world. It featured a song, poem and multimedia elements on the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Another performance was 6 Microlectures On Genocides, which was last staged in May. The R18 show comprised short works that explored themes of genocide, war crimes and contemporary conflicts.

The third example was a stand-up comedy called Namaste in 2024 with an Advisory 16 rating. It had a segment where the comedian spoke about the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Tan said that the licensing framework is designed to protect young people from unwanted content and also allow people to make decisions on what they can watch. At the same time, boundaries are needed for content that may stir up public disorder or national security considerations.

He added that any assessment on licensing “has to be contextual” because it is based on the prevailing sentiment and assessment by the agencies and the regulator at a given point in time.

With this in mind, Tan encouraged arts applicants to engage IMDA early, and the agency will contact other relevant public agencies for their inputs if needed. This is so that clarity and guidance can be given earlier.

Singapore Parliament

IMDA/Infocomm Media Development Authority

Ministry of Digital Development and Information

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻