House Committee chair Rome to call Bhumjaithai MP and Australian husband on Wednesday over wealth众议院委员会主席罗姆将于周三致电泰国议员布姆贾伊泰及其澳大利亚籍丈夫,讨论财富问题。
Nearly ฿2bn in family wealth comes under the microscope as Rangsiman Rome summons Bhumjaithai MP Suchada Sangtanasap and her husband over a ฿1.44bn loan to… Read More ›
新闻视频

October 4, 2026 at 10:49 am
in Living , Media , Politics , Thailand
Firebrand People’s Party MP Rangsiman Rome is probing nearly ฿2 billion in declared wealth belonging to Bhumjaithai MP Suchada Sangtanasap and Australian husband Taiyang Zhang. At the centre is a staggering ฿1.44 billion loan to collapsed crypto giant Three Arrows Capital. Now Rome is summoning the couple as the NACC, AMLO and SEC join the financial probe. It also reaches Suchada’s former role under Digital Economy Minister Chaichanok Chidchob and his disclosure of a ฿40 million monthly bribe offer linked to gambling and scam interests. Meanwhile, Suchada has filed a criminal defamation complaint and challenged Rome to produce evidence. Her MP father backs scrutiny but questions the committee’s powers over Zhang. Wednesday’s hearing will put the money, crypto transactions and origins of Zhang’s fortune firmly under examination.
Rangsiman Rome probes Bhumjaithai MP Suchada Sangtanasap and husband Taiyang Zhang’s ฿2bn wealth, including a ฿1.44bn loan to collapsed crypto fund 3AC. ( Source: Khaosod )
Firebrand People’s Party MP Rangsiman Rome is widening his investigation into Bhumjaithai MP Suchada Sangtanasap and her husband’s vast declared wealth.
The House inquiry will now examine financial trails, cryptocurrency dealings and nearly ฿2 billion in family assets. At its centre is a remarkable ฿1.44 billion loan to collapsed cryptocurrency hedge fund Three Arrows Capital.
Mr Rangsiman chairs the House Committee on Legal Affairs, Justice and Human Rights. He has confirmed Ms Suchada and Australian husband Taiyang Zhang will be called before it. The hearing is scheduled for 9.30 am on Wednesday, October 7. In parallel, several major financial agencies are being brought into the inquiry.
Financial agencies join Rome probe as Suchada fights back over questions about her husband’s wealth
Representatives from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) are being invited to participate. The Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are also being called. As part of this, Mr Rangsiman wants financial and cryptocurrency transactions examined in detail. He also wants the source of Mr Zhang’s substantial wealth established.
The investigation follows an extraordinary confrontation inside Parliament on October 1. During that exchange, Mr Rangsiman raised questions about possible links between Mr Zhang and international scam operations. Ms Suchada immediately rejected the suggestion. Within 24 hours, she took the dispute to police.
On October 2, Ms Suchada visited the Technology Crime Suppression Division. There, she lodged a criminal defamation complaint against Mr Rangsiman over his remarks. She insists her husband has no involvement with scam networks. In response, she challenged anyone holding evidence against him to hand it directly to the police.
“If there is evidence, then let’s prove it with evidence,” she said on Facebook on October 3. “If there is no evidence, then one should take responsibility for their words.” She said evidence involving scams or transnational crime should go through established legal procedures.
Rome presses ahead as ฿1.44 billion Three Arrows Capital loan moves to centre of House investigation
Mr Rangsiman, however, is pressing ahead with his parliamentary investigation. The inquiry is also becoming broader and considerably more detailed. He said Ms Suchada and Mr Zhang must receive an opportunity to explain their financial affairs. Notably, he stressed that the investigation does not establish that either committed an offence.
Yet Mr Rangsiman says serious questions remain about Mr Zhang’s wealth, investments and the origin of his money. Those questions have put Ms Suchada’s NACC asset declaration firmly under scrutiny. The declaration was filed after she took office on March 15. It records combined family assets of approximately ฿1.975 billion.
Of that amount, approximately ฿1.84 billion was declared as belonging to Mr Zhang. By comparison, Ms Suchada declared assets worth approximately ฿130 million. Significantly, the largest individual item was neither property nor cash. Approximately ฿1.44 billion was listed as money lent by Mr Zhang to Three Arrows Capital.
Three Arrows Capital, widely known as 3AC, was once a major cryptocurrency hedge fund. However, it collapsed during the cryptocurrency crisis of 2022. The business subsequently entered liquidation. As a result, Mr Zhang’s huge declared loan has become central to the developing House investigation.
Sirichok traces huge creditor claim as ฿97 million difference emerges in Three Arrows Capital records
Separately, former Democrat Party MP Sirichok Sopha has been examining records surrounding Mr Zhang’s finances. In particular, Mr Sirichok examined documents connected with the Three Arrows Capital liquidation. Those records contain a substantial creditor claim attributed to Mr Zhang. They also provide further details about the scale of the investment.
According to Mr Sirichok, Mr Zhang submitted a proof-of-debt claim on July 15, 2022. The claim totalled USDC 44,548,729.67. That amount included principal and claimed accrued interest. Crucially, the claim was reportedly admitted as an unsecured creditor claim during the liquidation process.
Mr Sirichok has also identified another financial issue requiring explanation. He highlighted a difference between figures appearing in records surrounding the loan. The original figure was approximately ฿1.44 billion. Meanwhile, a remaining figure of approximately ฿1.343 billion has also been identified.
That produces a difference of approximately ฿97.34 million. Even so, Mr Sirichok explicitly warned against treating that difference as evidence of wrongdoing. It could represent repayments or differences between accounting dates. Nevertheless, the figures provide another financial trail for examination.
Zhang’s Ren Protocol history and reported 40 million USDC transfer draw scrutiny in financial inquiry
On another front, attention is turning towards Mr Zhang’s previous involvement in the cryptocurrency industry. He was involved in founding Republic Protocol. The cryptocurrency project subsequently became known as Ren Protocol. Corporate and bankruptcy records cited in reporting provide further background to that venture.
Companies associated with Ren were acquired in early 2021. The purchaser was Maclaurin Investments, previously known as Alameda Ventures. It formed part of the wider Alameda Research business orbit. Soon afterwards, Mr Zhang reportedly made his loan to Three Arrows Capital.
The loan was reportedly made on March 4, 2021. However, no established evidence shows that money from the Ren transaction funded the 3AC loan. Equally, timing alone cannot establish such a financial connection. For that reason, Mr Sirichok wants the underlying acquisition documents and financial records examined.
Mr Sirichok has also turned to blockchain transactions. He claims to have traced cryptocurrency movements associated with the loan. Specifically, he identified what he says was a 40 million USDC transfer. According to Mr Sirichok, it went to a Three Arrows Capital address on March 4, 2021.
Those blockchain findings remain part of Mr Sirichok’s investigation. They have not been established as findings of fact by Mr Rangsiman’s committee. Nonetheless, the documented Three Arrows Capital creditor claim has sharpened questions surrounding Mr Zhang’s finances.
Rome seeks source of Zhang’s wealth as Suchada says husband built fortune through startup investments
Mr Rangsiman now wants answers directly from Mr Zhang. First, he wants to establish the source of his substantial funds. He also wants information about companies and cryptocurrency ventures connected with his earlier business activities. Beyond that, the committee intends to examine how the money moved.
Mr Rangsiman said unusual financial circumstances could bring AMLO directly into the examination. AMLO could examine assets and their origins under its statutory powers. At the same time, Mr Rangsiman stressed that financial scrutiny would not itself establish wrongdoing. Instead, investigators must determine whether the funds came from legitimate sources.
Another question concerns Mr Zhang’s occupation and how he accumulated such substantial wealth. Ms Suchada has already offered an explanation. She said her husband possessed considerable wealth before their marriage. She also described him as a startup investor.
According to Ms Suchada, Mr Zhang previously exited investments. Afterwards, he invested proceeds in other companies. She continues to maintain that neither she nor her husband committed wrongdoing. Meanwhile, another Bhumjaithai MP has entered the controversy on her side of the family.
Her father, Samrit Thaensap, is himself a sitting member of the House. He represents Bhumjaithai in Chaiyaphum Constituency 3. He also chairs the House Commerce and Intellectual Property Committee. His daughter represents neighbouring Chaiyaphum Constituency 4.
MP father backs scrutiny of Suchada and husband but questions House powers to compel Zhang to appear
Mr Samrit said the family was prepared to face scrutiny. He said becoming a public figure meant his daughter had to accept examination. This was especially so after declaring family assets approaching ฿2 billion. He also said he believed his son-in-law’s business activities were legitimate.
According to Mr Samrit, his daughter told him that Mr Zhang conducts business overseas. He said those operations were subject to strict monitoring systems. However, Mr Samrit said he did not interfere with the details of his son-in-law’s business. He understood that Mr Zhang was involved with startup ventures.
Mr Samrit said Mr Zhang had assured the family his assets were legitimately acquired. He said the assets could also be examined. Regarding his daughter’s defamation complaint, Mr Samrit said pursuing it was her right. He noted that the NACC asset declaration was already part of an official process.
Still, Mr Samrit raised questions about the House committee’s powers concerning his son-in-law. He said the committee’s legal authority should be clearly established. In particular, he questioned whether an outside individual should be required to appear without statutory authority.
Mr Samrit nevertheless said he did not want his daughter avoiding scrutiny. If legally empowered agencies sought information, he said cooperation should follow. He specifically cited the NACC and other investigative agencies. The senior Bhumjaithai MP also said his daughter should explain the matter publicly.
“When the matter is of public interest, my daughter should explain it to create understanding,” Mr Samrit said. He said documents from relevant agencies should ultimately establish the facts.
Suchada signals she will face committee as former role with Digital Economy Minister enters inquiry
Ms Suchada has similarly indicated that she is prepared to appear before Mr Rangsiman’s committee. When questioned, she said she had not yet received its invitation. Even so, she indicated she would attend if formally invited under parliamentary procedures.
Her husband occupies a different legal position. Mr Zhang is a private individual rather than an MP, minister or government official. Accordingly, the committee can invite him to provide evidence and answer questions. However, reporting indicates he may not face criminal penalties merely for refusing that invitation.
Whether he appears could therefore become important when the committee convenes on Wednesday. His presence would allow MPs to question him directly about the declared ฿1.44 billion loan. It could also provide answers about his cryptocurrency activities and the source of his wealth.
The investigation, though, stretches considerably further than the couple’s asset declaration. There is also a significant political connection. Ms Suchada previously served as secretary to Digital Economy and Society Minister Chaichanok Chidchob. Mr Rangsiman has specifically drawn attention to that previous role.
The original parliamentary confrontation developed while Mr Rangsiman was questioning Mr Chaichanok over another controversy. The Digital Economy and Society Minister previously revealed that he had been offered ฿40 million per month. The offer was linked to interests associated with online gambling and scam-related activities.
Rome widens inquiry to Suchada’s former ministry role while no official finding establishes wrongdoing
Against that background, Mr Rangsiman raised questions about Ms Suchada’s previous position within the minister’s political team. He noted that her service as Mr Chaichanok’s secretary coincided with the wider controversy. Accordingly, the committee says this is another matter it intends to examine.
The inquiry is now moving beyond the personal finances of Ms Suchada and Mr Zhang. It will also examine circumstances surrounding the ฿40 million monthly offer disclosed by Mr Chaichanok. At the same time, Mr Rangsiman has questioned how much Ms Suchada knew about matters involving her husband.
No finding has established that Ms Suchada knew of any financial irregularity. Likewise, no court has found that Mr Zhang participated in scam operations. There is presently no official investigative determination identifying him as a scammer. Nor has an official finding established his participation in a criminal scam organisation.
Mr Rangsiman has himself stressed the presumption of innocence. Even so, he insists that questions raised by the financial records require answers. Ms Suchada, meanwhile, is fighting the political battle while pursuing her criminal complaint. She continues challenging Mr Rangsiman to produce evidence supporting his claims.
Defamation case and House inquiry run in parallel as regulators examine vast crypto-linked money trails
The confrontation has therefore developed along two distinct tracks. One is the criminal defamation complaint lodged with technology crime police. The other is Mr Rangsiman’s House committee investigation. Increasingly, however, the parliamentary inquiry is centred on financial records rather than the original political clash.
Those records contain huge sums. Foremost is approximately ฿1.44 billion declared as a loan to Three Arrows Capital. There is also the USDC 44.55 million creditor claim reportedly submitted during its liquidation. Additionally, Mr Sirichok has identified what he says was a 40 million USDC blockchain transfer.
Questions also remain about Mr Zhang’s earlier cryptocurrency ventures and subsequent investments. The committee will now seek explanations concerning those financial trails. To support that work, it is bringing financial regulators and the anti-money-laundering agency into the examination.
The NACC already holds the declaration placing the couple’s wealth on the public record. AMLO, meanwhile, can investigate financial trails where grounds exist under anti-money-laundering legislation. The SEC is being brought in as the committee pushes deeper into cryptocurrency transactions.
Wednesday’s hearing therefore marks a significant escalation of the parliamentary investigation. Mr Rangsiman said he was prepared to cooperate with requests for evidence supporting his statements. Conversely, Ms Suchada has made clear that serious accusations must be backed by evidence.
Nearly ฿2 billion family fortune takes centre stage as Wednesday hearing brings financial agencies in
For now, the financial records provide the central focus. The declared family fortune approaches ฿2 billion. Mr Zhang accounts for approximately ฿1.84 billion of that total. The Three Arrows Capital loan alone represents approximately ฿1.44 billion.
Its history leads directly into the collapse of one of cryptocurrency’s most prominent hedge funds. Separately, it leads back towards Mr Zhang’s earlier activities in the digital asset industry. Yet the committee has established no wrongdoing from those connections.
Instead, Wednesday provides the next major test. Ms Suchada will have an opportunity to answer questions before Mr Rangsiman’s committee. The committee also wants Mr Zhang there. Alongside them, the NACC, AMLO and SEC are being brought into the widening examination.
What began as a fierce confrontation on the House floor has consequently become a detailed financial inquiry. At its centre remains one striking figure. It is the approximately ฿1.44 billion which Ms Suchada’s declaration says her husband lent to Three Arrows Capital.
Mr Rangsiman now wants the financial records opened up. He wants the source of the money established. He also wants its movement traced and the subsequent transactions explained.
Bhumjaithai MP files police report against People’s Party’s Rangsiman Rome over scammer link remarks
Rangsiman Rome defamation case deferred until May 2027. Criticism of scam case prosecutions by police
Former cabinet minister and Pheu Thai highflyer clarifies Ben Smith and luxury Gulfstream jet story
PM Paetongtarn suspended from duties while Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Jungrungruangkit takes power
Teng warns People’s Party to stay clear of rising anti-democratic sentiment as political crisis unfolds
Opinion shows Prime Minister Paetongtarn finished with the public. Huge support for the People’s Party
Bangkok protest passes off with no overnight camp. Meanwhile, the PM prepares for July 1st court date
PM Paetongtarn names herself Culture Minister also in new cabinet ahead of Constitutional Court ruling
Hun Sen’s mask falls. Speech on Friday clearly showed deliberate ill will to collapse Thailand’s democracy
Crazed Hun Sen threatens to expose Thaksin before Bangkok street protests as his evil empire is exposed
Prime Minister Paetongtarn’s casino plan may be the motive following Hun Sen’s betrayal of the Shinawatra clan
Constitutional Court President admits he’s troubled by the audio clip case against the Prime Minister
July 1st set as date for the Constitutional Court to deal with the case that could see the PM removed
PM Paetongtarn reshuffles the deck on the Titanic in a major cabinet shuffle as her government treads water
Joseph Anthony is an expat from Ireland who has lived in Thailand for the last decade. He has worked extensively in the media including editorial positions in Ireland and Thailand. He is focused on economic and business stories in Thailand as well as the expat lifestyle.
All posts by Joseph O' Connor
Pattani midnight attack sees masked gunmen bomb a store and gut a truck causing havoc and disruption September 30, 2026 Fresh Deep South violence hits Pattani as armed men
Flooding crisis another black eye for Thai governance as Prime Minister Anutin faces rising criticism September 30, 2026 Flood fury closes in on PM Anutin as Bangkok battles
Mixed messages from Thai government on a US Thai trade deal despite Commerce Minister’s optimism September 29, 2026 Thailand’s US trade deal hits a hiatus as Suphajee
USS George HW Bush heading for Phuket for 6 days R&R. Docks October 5 with over five thousand sailors September 29, 2026 Phuket braces for 5,120 US personnel as USS George
Thai Airways CEO apologises for ongoing flooding crisis issues with defective carts and delayed flights September 29, 2026 Defective baggage equipment and staff shortages hammer
Foreign tourist arrivals already down 3.65% with fears the flooding crisis may impact the Chinese market September 29, 2026 Thailand’s tourism engine sputters into high season
Anutin rejects appeal against deportation made by French man Kevin Dimino despite wife’s submission September 28, 2026 French zoo owner Kevin Dimino faces deportation after
32 year old Ranger killed in one shot incident in Narathiwat on Sunday evening as he took up position September 28, 2026 One gunshot kills Ranger Sukran Lateh, 32, as his
Tourism minister directs acute airport baggage crisis caused by workers who failed to turn up for shifts September 28, 2026 Tourism Minister Surasak rushes to Suvarnabhumi as the
Prime Minister Anutin wades into flood hit areas to be met with a mixed reaction including seething anger September 28, 2026 Bangkok flood victims confront Prime Minister Anutin
Nene Royal after conquering the showbiz world this week returns home to Phuket to her granny’s embrace September 27, 2026 Thailand’s Nene Royal returns to Phuket after
Bangkok airports open and flights running but there are delays and baggage issues at Suvarnabhumi September 27, 2026 Flood chaos hits Suvarnabhumi as passengers wait six
Bangkok flooding eases as front moves to Myanmar but Governor warns city needs 2-3 days to recover September 27, 2026 The Thai capital races to drain vast floodwater after
Figures for opening 8 months of 2026 show a gaping trade deficit as Thailand imports more from China September 27, 2026 Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul visited London
PM directs flash flooding crisis which has hit Bangkok making all 50 districts disaster zones from London September 26, 2026 Bangkok battles severe flooding after almost 300mm of
Prime Minister Anutin’s US visit this week yielded a closer ties pact between Bangkok and Wall Street September 26, 2026 Wall Street opens its doors to closer Thai links as
Horror in Phuket as policeman’s Glock gun misfires in slider action fatally wounding his 49 year old mother September 25, 2026 Phuket policeman faces a fatal shooting probe after
British mother from Croydon in a Cambodian hellhole prison facing up to 20 years after drug mule dupe September 30, 2026
Serving Election Commissioner again voicing his concerns about the probe into the 2024 Senate poll September 30, 2026
Thai Airways admits it got it wrong as Suvarnabhumi Airport public areas are swamped by a baggage flood September 30, 2026
Turkish arsonist arrested. His Thai girlfriend hired him to destroy evidence at her former workplace September 29, 2026
Race against time and water flows as PM Anutin works round the clock tackling flooding emergency September 29, 2026
Thailand moves carefully with AI regulation as US tech warns over key provisions hindering investment September 29, 2026
Military operations are expanded at Suvarnabhumi Airport as crisis is still not brought under control September 28, 2026
PM’s relief as Constitutional Court upholds February 8th General Election despite a barcode warning September 28, 2026
Royal Thai Army deployed to Suvarnabhumi Airport after baggage chaos gets the better of exhausted staff September 28, 2026
Love triangle horror in Chumphon sees all three dead after government officer goes on a killing rampage September 27, 2026
NIDA opinion poll shows rising apathy among the Thai public as Prime Minister Anutin’s base crashes September 27, 2026
Flooding tragedy in Samut Prakan near Bangkok. Two die from electrocution after family car is submerged September 27, 2026
Crucial ballot decision of Constitutional Court on Monday could upend government and Thai politics September 27, 2026
American arrested in Pattaya after a joint agency raid found an illicit narcotics factory in his suburban home September 26, 2026
Warning in Thailand over fake cough syrup bottles. Police smash counterfeit medicine empire in 4 raids September 26, 2026
Spanish chef (32) who murdered and dismembered a Colombian surgeon on Koh Phangan loses appeal September 26, 2026
Dizziness, headaches in a Pattaya locale after a cannabis farm fire at a residence on Friday morning guts the property September 25, 2026
33 year old sets fire to Honda Scooby in Udon Thani after mother refused to buy him a more powerful ride September 25, 2026
Ministers accused of neglecting Thai farmers. Crucial aid support has not yet reached the cabinet table September 25, 2026
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul formally summoned by parliament over local government exam scandal September 24, 2026
Former Justice Minister hails major bankruptcy bill which could help reduce the household debt burden September 24, 2026
Nene Royal wins big for Thailand with blistering ‘Seven Nation Army’ final act. Nets $1 million prize September 24, 2026
© 2026 Thai Examiner. All rights reserved.
2026年10月4日上午10:49
在生活、媒体、政治、泰国
激进的人民党议员朗西曼·罗姆正在调查泰自豪党议员苏查达·桑塔纳萨普及其澳大利亚籍丈夫张太阳近20亿泰铢的申报财产。调查的核心是一笔高达14.4亿泰铢的贷款,这笔贷款流向了已倒闭的加密货币巨头三箭资本。如今,罗姆传唤了这对夫妇,国家反腐败委员会(NACC)、反洗钱和证券交易委员会(SEC)也加入了此次金融调查。调查还涉及苏查达在数字经济部长猜猜诺·奇乔布手下担任的职务,以及他披露的每月4000万泰铢的贿赂,这些贿赂与赌博和诈骗有关。与此同时,苏查达已提起刑事诽谤诉讼,并要求罗姆提供证据。她的父亲,同样身为议员,支持此次调查,但质疑委员会对张太阳的管辖权。周三的听证会将对这笔资金、加密货币交易以及张太阳财富的来源进行严格审查。
兰西曼·罗姆正在调查泰自豪党议员苏查达·桑塔纳萨普及其丈夫张太阳的20亿泰铢财富,其中包括向倒闭的加密货币基金3AC提供的14.4亿泰铢贷款。(来源:考索德报)
激进的人民党议员朗西曼·罗姆正在扩大对泰自豪党议员苏查达·桑塔纳萨普及其丈夫申报的巨额财富的调查。
众议院的调查将审查财务流向、加密货币交易以及近20亿泰铢的家族资产。调查的核心是一笔高达14.4亿泰铢的贷款,该贷款发放给了已倒闭的加密货币对冲基金Three Arrows Capital。
朗西曼先生是众议院法律事务、司法和人权委员会主席。他已确认苏查达女士及其澳大利亚籍丈夫张太阳将被传唤到委员会作证。听证会定于10月7日星期三上午9点30分举行。与此同时,几家大型金融机构也被纳入调查范围。
金融机构加入罗马方面的调查,苏查达则反驳有关其丈夫财富的质疑。
国家反腐败委员会(NACC)的代表受邀参与此次调查。反洗钱办公室(AMLO)和证券交易委员会(SEC)也被传唤。作为调查的一部分,朗西曼先生希望对金融和加密货币交易进行详细审查,并查明张先生巨额财富的来源。
此次调查源于10月1日议会内发生的一起非同寻常的冲突。在冲突中,朗西曼先生质疑张先生是否与国际诈骗活动有关联。苏查达女士立即否认了这一说法。24小时内,她便将此事报告给了警方。
10月2日,苏查达女士前往科技犯罪打击部门,就兰西曼先生的言论向警方提起刑事诽谤诉讼。她坚称丈夫与任何诈骗团伙均无瓜葛,并呼吁任何掌握其丈夫不利证据的人直接向警方提交证据。
“如果有证据,那就用证据来证明,”她10月3日在Facebook上写道。“如果没有证据,那就应该为自己的言论负责。”她表示,涉及诈骗或跨国犯罪的证据应该按照既定的法律程序进行审查。
罗马方面继续推进,此前,Three Arrows Capital 14.4亿泰铢的贷款成为众议院调查的焦点。
然而,朗西曼先生仍在推进议会调查。调查范围也在扩大,内容也更加详尽。他表示,苏查达女士和张先生必须有机会解释他们的财务状况。值得注意的是,他强调,调查并未证实两人犯有任何罪行。
然而,朗西曼先生表示,关于张先生的财富、投资及其资金来源,仍然存在诸多疑问。这些疑问使得苏查达女士向国家反腐败委员会(NACC)提交的资产申报受到严格审查。该申报是在她3月15日就职后提交的,其中记录了其家族约19.75亿泰铢的资产。
其中,约18.4亿泰铢申报为张先生所有。相比之下,苏查达女士申报的资产约为1.3亿泰铢。值得注意的是,最大的单项资产既非房产也非现金。约14.4亿泰铢被列为张先生借给三箭资本的款项。
三箭资本(Three Arrows Capital,简称3AC)曾是一家大型加密货币对冲基金。然而,在2022年的加密货币危机中,该公司倒闭,随后进入清算程序。因此,张先生申报的巨额贷款成为众议院调查的核心。
Sirichok 追踪到巨额债权人索赔,Three Arrows Capital 的账目显示存在 9700 万泰铢的差额。
此外,前民主党议员西里乔克·索帕一直在审查张先生的财务记录。特别是,西里乔克先生审查了与三箭资本清算相关的文档。这些记录包含一份归咎于张先生的大额债权索赔,并提供了有关投资规模的更多细节。
据西里乔克先生称,张先生于2022年7月15日提交了一份债权证明,债权总额为44,548,729.67美元,其中包括本金和所声称的利息。至关重要的是,据报道,该债权在清算过程中被认定为无担保债权。
Sirichok先生还发现了另一个需要解释的财务问题。他指出,贷款记录中的数字存在差异。最初的数字约为14.4亿泰铢,而剩余的数字约为13.43亿泰铢。
这造成了约9734万泰铢的差额。即便如此,西里乔克先生明确警告不要将这一差额视为不当行为的证据。它可能代表的是还款或会计日期之间的差异。尽管如此,这些数字仍然为审查提供了另一条财务线索。
张的任氏协议历史以及据报道的4000万美元USDC转账引发了金融调查的审查。
另一方面,人们的关注点转向了张先生此前在加密货币行业的涉足。他曾参与创立了Republic Protocol,该加密货币项目后来更名为Ren Protocol。报道中引用的公司和破产记录提供了更多关于该项目的背景信息。
与任志强相关的公司于2021年初被收购。收购方是麦克劳林投资公司(Maclaurin Investments),该公司前身为阿拉米达创投公司(Alameda Ventures),隶属于阿拉米达研究公司(Alameda Research)旗下。据报道,此后不久,张先生向三箭资本提供了贷款。
据报道,这笔贷款于2021年3月4日发放。然而,目前尚无确凿证据表明,任氏交易的资金用于支付3AC的贷款。同样,仅凭时间点也无法确定二者之间存在财务联系。因此,西里乔克先生希望审查相关的收购文件和财务记录。
Sirichok先生也开始关注区块链交易。他声称已经追踪到与这笔贷款相关的加密货币流动。具体来说,他发现了一笔价值4000万美元的USDC转账。据Sirichok先生称,这笔款项于2021年3月4日转入Three Arrows Capital的一个地址。
这些区块链方面的发现仍属于西里乔克先生调查的一部分,尚未被朗西曼先生的委员会认定为事实。然而,有据可查的三箭资本债权人索赔记录,加剧了人们对张先生财务状况的质疑。
罗马方面正在调查张氏家族的财富来源,苏查达称其丈夫是通过创业投资积累了财富。
朗西曼先生现在想直接向张先生询问情况。首先,他想查明张先生巨额资金的来源。他还想了解与张先生早期商业活动相关的公司和加密货币项目的信息。此外,委员会还打算调查资金的流向。
朗西曼先生表示,异常的财务状况可能直接将洛佩斯反腐败局纳入调查范围。洛佩斯反腐败局可以根据其法定权力审查资产及其来源。同时,朗西曼先生强调,财务审查本身并不能认定存在不当行为。调查人员必须确定资金来源是否合法。
另一个问题涉及张先生的职业以及他如何积累了如此巨额的财富。苏查达女士已经做出了解释。她说,她的丈夫在婚前就拥有相当可观的财富,她还称他是一位创业投资者。
据苏查达女士称,张先生此前已退出投资,并将所得资金投资于其他公司。她始终坚称自己和丈夫均无不当行为。与此同时,另一位泰自豪党议员也因其家族背景卷入了这场争议。
她的父亲萨姆里特·坦萨普本人也是国会议员,代表泰国人民党在猜也奔选区3选区任职,同时担任国会商业和知识产权委员会主席。他的女儿则代表邻近的猜也奔选区4选区。
议员父亲支持对苏查达及其丈夫进行审查,但质疑议会是否有权强制张某出庭作证。
萨姆里特先生表示,全家已做好接受审查的准备。他说,成为公众人物意味着他的女儿必须接受审查,尤其是在申报了近20亿泰铢的家庭资产之后。他还表示,他相信女婿的商业活动是合法的。
据萨姆里特先生说,他女儿告诉他张先生在海外做生意。他说这些生意都受到严格的监控。不过,萨姆里特先生表示,他没有干预女婿生意的具体细节。他了解到张先生涉足的是初创企业。
萨姆里特先生表示,张先生已向其家人保证,他的资产均合法取得。他还表示,这些资产也可以接受审查。关于他女儿提出的诽谤投诉,萨姆里特先生表示,这是她的权利。他指出,向国家反腐败委员会(NACC)申报资产本身就是官方程序的一部分。
尽管如此,萨姆里特先生还是对众议院委员会处理其女婿案件的权力提出了质疑。他表示,委员会的法律权限应该明确界定。他尤其质疑,在没有法定授权的情况下,是否应该要求外部人员出庭作证。
尽管如此,萨姆里特先生表示,他不希望女儿逃避审查。他说,如果依法有权的机构寻求信息,她应该配合。他特别提到了国家反腐败委员会(NACC)和其他调查机构。这位泰自豪党资深议员还表示,他的女儿应该公开解释此事。
萨姆里特先生说:“如果事情涉及公众利益,我的女儿应该解释清楚,让大家理解。” 他还表示,最终应该由相关机构的文件来查明事实。
苏查达表示,她将出席委员会听证会,此前她曾担任数字经济部长一职,目前正接受调查。
苏查达女士也表示,她已准备好出席兰西曼先生的委员会听证会。当被问及此事时,她说尚未收到邀请。即便如此,她也表示,如果按照议会程序正式收到邀请,她将会出席。
她的丈夫在法律上属于不同的身份。张先生是普通公民,而非议员、部长或政府官员。因此,委员会可以邀请他提供证据并回答问题。然而,有报道指出,他可能仅仅因为拒绝邀请而不会面临刑事处罚。
因此,他是否出席周三的委员会会议可能至关重要。他的出席将使议员们能够就他申报的14.4亿泰铢贷款直接质询他。此外,他的出席也可能揭示其加密货币活动及其财富来源的真相。
然而,调查的范围远不止于这对夫妇的资产申报。其中还牵涉到重要的政治关系。苏查达女士曾担任数字经济与社会部长柴查诺·奇乔布的秘书。朗西曼先生特别强调了她之前的这段经历。
最初的议会冲突源于朗西曼先生就另一桩争议质询柴查诺克先生。这位数字经济和社会部长此前透露,有人曾向他提供每月4000万泰铢的报酬。该报酬与网络赌博和诈骗活动有关。
罗马方面扩大调查范围,将苏查达此前的部长职务也纳入其中,但目前尚无官方调查结果证实其存在不当行为。
在此背景下,朗西曼先生对苏查达女士此前在部长政治团队中的职位提出了质疑。他指出,苏查达女士担任柴查诺克先生秘书期间,正值这场更广泛的争议爆发之际。因此,委员会表示,这是他们打算调查的另一个问题。
调查范围已不再局限于苏查达女士和张先生的个人财务状况,还将审查柴查诺克先生披露的每月4000万泰铢的聘用方案的相关情况。与此同时,朗西曼先生质疑苏查达女士对涉及其丈夫的事务究竟了解多少。
目前尚无证据表明苏查达女士知晓任何财务违规行为。同样,也没有任何法院认定张先生参与了诈骗活动。目前没有任何官方调查结果认定他是诈骗犯,也没有任何官方调查结果证实他参与了犯罪诈骗组织。
朗西曼先生本人强调了无罪推定原则。即便如此,他仍然坚持认为财务记录提出的问题需要得到解答。与此同时,苏查达女士在继续推进刑事诉讼的同时,也在进行政治斗争。她持续要求朗西曼先生拿出证据来支持他的说法。
诽谤案和众议院调查同时进行,监管机构也在审查与加密货币相关的巨额资金流向。
因此,这场冲突沿着两条截然不同的路径发展。一条是向科技犯罪警察部门提起的刑事诽谤诉讼。另一条是朗西曼先生领导的众议院委员会的调查。然而,议会调查的重点越来越集中在财务记录上,而非最初的政治冲突。
这些记录包含巨额资金。其中最主要的是向Three Arrows Capital申报的约14.4亿泰铢贷款。此外,据报道,该公司清算期间还提交了一笔价值4455万USDC的债权人索赔。另外,Sirichok先生还发现了一笔价值4000万USDC的区块链转账。
张先生早期的加密货币投资及其后续投资也存在疑问。委员会将就这些资金流向寻求解释。为支持这项工作,委员会已邀请金融监管机构和反洗钱机构参与调查。
国家反洗钱委员会(NACC)已掌握这对夫妇的财产申报信息,该信息已公开记录在案。与此同时,洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔(AMLO)可以根据反洗钱法,对存在犯罪嫌疑的资金流向展开调查。随着委员会对加密货币交易的深入调查,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)也介入其中。
因此,周三的听证会标志着议会调查的重大升级。朗西曼先生表示,他准备配合提供证据以支持其陈述。而苏查达女士则明确表示,任何严重的指控都必须有证据支持。
近20亿泰铢的家族财富成为周三听证会的焦点,金融机构将介入调查。
目前,财务记录是关注的焦点。申报的家族财富接近20亿泰铢,其中张先生的财富约占18.4亿泰铢。仅三箭资本的贷款就高达约14.4亿泰铢。
这段历史直接导致了加密货币领域最知名的对冲基金之一的倒闭。此外,它也与张先生早期在数字资产行业的活动有关。然而,委员会并未从这些关联中发现任何不当行为。
相反,周三将是下一场重大考验。苏查达女士将有机会在兰西曼先生的委员会面前回答问题。委员会也希望张先生出席。此外,国家反腐败委员会(NACC)、反腐败局(AMLO)和证券交易委员会(SEC)也将被纳入此次扩大审查范围的调查。
这场始于众议院激烈辩论的事件,最终演变成一场详尽的财务调查。调查的核心始终是一个引人注目的数字:苏查达女士在声明中称,她的丈夫曾借给三箭资本约14.4亿泰铢。
朗西曼先生现在要求公开财务记录,查明资金来源,追踪资金流向,并解释后续交易。
泰自豪党议员就人民党议员兰西曼·罗姆的诈骗链接言论向警方报案
兰西曼·罗姆诽谤案延期至2027年5月审理。警方对诈骗案的起诉受到批评。
前内阁部长兼为泰党高层澄清本·史密斯与豪华湾流喷气式飞机的故事
总理帕通坦被停职,副总理苏里亚·荣伦伦吉接任总理一职。
邓小平警告人民党要远离日益高涨的反民主情绪,因为政治危机正在不断演变。
民意调查显示,总理佩通坦已失去民心。人民党获得巨大支持。
曼谷抗议活动结束,没有出现过夜露营的情况。与此同时,总理正准备参加7月1日的庭审。
在宪法法院裁决前夕,总理佩通坦在新内阁中任命自己为文化部长。
洪森的伪装被揭穿了。周五的讲话清楚地表明了他蓄意破坏泰国民主的恶意。
疯狂的洪森威胁要在曼谷街头抗议活动爆发前揭露他信的真面目,因为他的邪恶帝国即将暴露。
洪森背叛西那瓦家族后,首相佩通坦的赌场计划或许是其动机所在。
宪法法院院长承认,他对总理的录音案件感到不安。
7月1日被定为宪法法院审理可能导致总理下台案件的日期。
总理佩通坦对内阁进行了一次重大改组,如同泰坦尼克号上的甲板重新洗牌,而她的政府却在原地踏步。
约瑟夫·安东尼是一位来自爱尔兰的侨民,过去十年一直居住在泰国。他曾在爱尔兰和泰国的媒体行业担任过编辑职务,拥有丰富的媒体从业经验。他主要关注泰国的经济和商业新闻,以及侨民的生活方式。
约瑟夫·奥康纳的所有帖子
2026年9月30日,帕塔尼午夜发生袭击事件,蒙面枪手炸毁一家商店并烧毁一辆卡车,造成混乱和骚乱。南部深区暴力事件再次袭击帕塔尼,武装人员……
洪灾危机再添泰国政府耻辱,总理阿努廷面临日益高涨的批评声浪 2026年9月30日 洪灾肆虐,曼谷遭受重创,总理阿努廷岌岌可危
尽管商务部长苏帕吉持乐观态度,但泰国政府就美泰贸易协议发出的信息仍然混乱。2026年9月29日,由于苏帕吉的言论,泰美贸易协议陷入停滞。
“乔治·H·W·布什”号航空母舰即将前往普吉岛进行为期6天的休整。该舰将于10月5日靠岸,届时将有超过5000名水兵抵达。2026年9月29日,普吉岛准备迎接5120名美国人员,届时“乔治·H·W·布什”号将抵达普吉岛。
泰国航空首席执行官就持续不断的行李搬运车故障和航班延误问题致歉(2026年9月29日) 行李搬运设备故障和人手短缺严重影响了泰国航空的运营。
外国游客到访量已下降3.65%,人们担心洪灾危机可能影响中国市场(2026年9月29日) 泰国旅游业在旺季来临之际步履蹒跚
尽管妻子提交了上诉,但阿努廷驳回了法国男子凯文·迪米诺针对其驱逐出境的上诉 2026年9月28日 法国动物园老板凯文·迪米诺面临被驱逐出境
2026年9月28日星期日晚,32岁的护林员苏克兰·拉特在纳拉提瓦府执勤时遭枪击身亡。
旅游部长指示处理因工人未按时上班而导致的机场行李严重危机 2026年9月28日 旅游部长素拉萨赶赴素万那普机场
2026年9月28日,阿努廷总理亲临洪灾地区,遭遇民众褒贬不一的反应,其中不乏愤怒之声。曼谷洪灾灾民与阿努廷总理对峙。
泰国女星妮妮·罗亚尔 (Nene Royal) 本周在演艺圈大获成功后,于2026年9月27日返回普吉岛,与祖母团聚。
曼谷机场已开放并恢复航班,但素万那普机场出现延误和行李问题(2026年9月27日)。洪水袭击素万那普机场,乘客等待六小时。
随着锋面移向缅甸,曼谷洪水有所缓解,但曼谷市长警告称,该市需要2-3天才能恢复正常。2026年9月27日,泰国首都曼谷正全力排水。
2026年前8个月的数据显示,由于泰国从中国的进口增加,贸易逆差巨大。2026年9月27日,泰国总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔访问伦敦。
总理指示应对袭击曼谷的突发性洪水危机,曼谷所有50个区均被列为灾区(2026年9月26日,伦敦报道)。曼谷在近300毫米降雨后正与严重洪灾作斗争。
阿努廷总理本周访美,促成了曼谷与华尔街之间更紧密联系的协议。2026年9月26日,华尔街向泰国敞开大门,寻求更紧密的联系。
2026年9月25日,普吉岛发生一起骇人听闻的事件:一名警察的格洛克手枪在滑套动作中走火,导致其49岁的母亲不幸身亡。事发后,这名普吉岛警察将面临致命枪击案的调查。
2026年9月30日,一名来自克罗伊登的英国母亲因欺骗他人充当毒品运输者而被关押在柬埔寨人间炼狱般的监狱中,面临最高20年的监禁。
现任选举专员再次表达了他对2024年参议院选举调查的担忧(2026年9月30日)
泰国航空公司承认失误,素万那普机场公共区域被行李淹没 2026年9月30日
土耳其纵火犯被捕。他的泰国女友雇佣他销毁其前工作场所的证据。2026年9月29日
与时间赛跑,与洪水赛跑,阿努廷总理夜以继日地应对洪灾紧急情况 2026年9月29日
泰国谨慎推进人工智能监管,美国科技公司警告称关键条款可能阻碍投资 2026年9月29日
2026年9月28日,由于危机仍未得到控制,素万那普机场的军事行动范围扩大。
尽管有条形码警告,宪法法院仍维持2月8日大选的合法性,总理松了一口气 2026年9月28日
2026年9月28日,行李混乱导致疲惫不堪的机场工作人员不堪重负,泰国皇家陆军被派往素万那普机场。
2026年9月27日,春蓬府发生一起三角恋恐怖事件,一名政府官员突然发狂,三人全部遇害。
2026年9月27日,泰国国家发展研究所(NIDA)民意调查显示,随着总理阿努廷的基地坠毁,泰国公众的冷漠情绪日益加剧。
2026年9月27日,曼谷附近北榄府发生洪水悲剧,一辆汽车被淹,两人触电身亡。
宪法法院周一的关键投票裁决或将颠覆泰国政府和政治格局 2026年9月27日
2026年9月26日,一名美国公民在芭堤雅被捕,此前联合执法机构突袭了他的郊区住宅,在其住所内发现了一个非法制毒窝点。
泰国警方发出警告,警惕假冒止咳糖浆。2026年9月26日,警方在四次突击行动中捣毁了一个假药帝国。
2026年9月26日,在帕岸岛谋杀并肢解哥伦比亚外科医生的32岁西班牙厨师上诉被驳回。
2026年9月25日星期五上午,芭堤雅一处民宅发生大麻种植场火灾,房屋被烧毁,当地居民出现头晕、头痛等症状。
2026年9月25日,一名33岁男子因母亲拒绝给他买一辆动力更强的车,在乌隆他尼纵火焚烧了自己的本田史酷比汽车。
部长们被指责忽视泰国农民。关键援助资金尚未提交内阁审议(2026年9月25日)
2026年9月24日,总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔因地方政府考试丑闻被议会正式传唤。
前司法部长称赞一项重大破产法案,该法案有望减轻家庭债务负担 2026年9月24日
妮妮·罗亚尔凭借精彩绝伦的《七国军队》压轴表演为泰国赢得大奖,斩获100万美元奖金(2026年9月24日)。
© 2026 Thai Examiner。版权所有。