← 返回新闻首页
新加坡主流

GIC, Temasek rebut allegations of pressuring MSCI to downgrade Indonesia

GIC and Temasek deny allegations of pressuring MSCI to downgrade Indonesia’s stock market classification amid index review concerns. Read more at straitstimes.com.

The Straits TimesAngela Tan查看原文 ↗
This was not the first time MSCI has warned that it would downgrade Indonesia. It previously warned in January that it could downgrade the country from emerging to frontier market.
This was not the first time MSCI has warned that it would downgrade Indonesia. It previously warned in January that it could downgrade the country from emerging to frontier market.

This was not the first time MSCI has warned that it would downgrade Indonesia. It previously warned in January that it could downgrade the country from emerging to frontier market.

Published Oct 21, 2026, 04:35 PM

Updated Oct 21, 2026, 08:52 PM

GIC and Temasek denied claims they pressured MSCI to downgrade Indonesia. GIC said it invests based on “company- and asset-level fundamentals”, while Temasek said the claims are “patently untrue”.

MSCI is reviewing whether to reclassify Indonesia from an emerging market to standalone status. It says its decisions use “transparent and rules-based methodologies” and will decide by June 30, 2027.

The warning has shaken Indonesian stocks, with the Jakarta Composite Index falling more than 14% before recovering 5%. IDX is tightening rules on concentrated share ownership to avoid exclusion from MSCI benchmarks.

SINGAPORE – Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC and investment company Temasek have rejected allegations that they or their staff pressured index provider MSCI to consider downgrading Indonesia’s stock market classification.

This follows accusations on Oct 20 by former Indonesian trade minister Muhammad Lutfi that the two investors coerced MSCI to consider downgrading Indonesia.

The former minister claimed that a downgrade could trigger market panic and create opportunities to acquire Indonesian equities at lower prices.

A GIC spokesperson told The Straits Times: “Our investment decisions are not driven by index classifications or top-down views of a market, and instead by company- and asset-level fundamentals.

“We have been invested in Indonesia for over 30 years across asset classes and will continue to invest where we find good, bottom-up, risk-adjusted opportunities.”

Fock Wai Hoong, head of Asia-Pacific excluding China and India at Temasek Global Investments, said the allegations have “no basis and are patently untrue”.

“No one from Temasek – neither the institution nor the individuals working for the institution – has ever reached out to MSCI in order to influence any decisions they have ever made around any exchange across the region.

“Maybe I’ll leave it at that,” he said.

Fock was responding to the media during the launch of the e-Conomy SEA 2026 report at Google’s office in Mapletree Business City on Oct 21.

Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) president director Jeffrey Hendrik defended the independence of MSCI on Oct 20 following the allegations.

“We have always believed, and continue to believe, that global index providers are independent,” he told reporters at the IDX building in Jakarta.

MSCI, meanwhile, told ST that its index decisions follow transparent and rules-based methodologies.

It is accepting market feedback until April 30, 2027, and will announce its decision by June 30.

“MSCI will continue to monitor developments in the Indonesian market and engage with market participants and authorities,” it said, adding that it does not disclose investor feedback during an open consultation period.

The controversy comes after a record two-day market sell-off following MSCI’s warning on Oct 15 of the possible removal of Indonesia from its global indexes. Among its concerns were shareholding opacity, insider trading and regulatory enforcement.

Every year, MSCI reviews all global markets and determines whether they should be classified as developed, emerging, frontier or standalone, based on economic development, market size, liquidity and accessibility.

The index provider has launched a consultation on whether to reclassify Indonesia from an emerging market to standalone status, a move which can be a big blow for the country as its stocks would be excluded from indexes used by investors.

Any reclassification could have significant implications for Indonesian equities, including investment flows from funds that track MSCI indexes , which are widely used as benchmarks for tracking different global markets.

The index provider’s move indicates that the concerns extend beyond market size or liquidity and relate to more fundamental issues involving the integrity and credibility of trading mechanisms, said Eastspring Investments, an asset management business of Prudential.

Other standalone markets include Argentina, Lebanon and Zimbabwe.

The Jakarta Composite Index fell more than 14% from Oct 16 to 19 following MSCI’s warning.

However, the index recovered 5% on Oct 20, after IDX said the night before that it would expel companies with highly concentrated share ownership from its flagship index in its latest attempt to avoid ejection from MSCI’s global emerging markets benchmark.

The announcement followed a virtual meeting between the exchange and MSCI officials.

Such companies, which make up almost a fifth of the index’s combined market value, include Dian Swastatika Sentosa and Barito Renewables Energy – two of the biggest companies in the index by market value.

The exchange did not say when the expulsions would take effect.

The Jakarta exchange has since introduced reforms, including cutting the minimum price at which a stock can trade from 50 rupiah to one rupiah in an attempt to promote liquidity, and doubling the minimum free float – the portion of stocks available for trading – to 15% of a company’s shares.

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻