Female security officer at Suvarnabhumi Airport suspended after altercation with social media influencer素万那普机场一名女保安因与社交媒体网红发生冲突而被停职
Water bottle fury at Suvarnabhumi. Influencer Gamgy accuses a security officer of threatening her after a family insult. Her employer defends her, but airport bosses… Read More ›
新闻视频

November 1, 2026 at 12:22 pm
by James Morris and Son Nguyen
in Crime , Living , Media , Thailand
A furious row over children’s drinking water has left a female security officer suspended at Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi Airport. Thai beauty influencer Kotchawan Sajja, known as Gamgy, accused the officer of threatening to attack her in front of her children. The clash followed Gamgy’s remark about the employee’s family problems. However, the security company defended its officer and denied any attempted assault. Five days later, viral footage sparked an airport investigation. Silent CCTV recordings fuelled controversy as management condemned the officer’s conduct, contradicting her employer’s defence. By Thursday, October 29, she was suspended pending disciplinary proceedings. The airport apologised but upheld the original water restrictions. Meanwhile, conflicting accounts and complaints about security staff intensified the row, which is still subject to adjudication.
A Suvarnabhumi security officer was suspended after influencer Gamgy accused her of threatening an attack over children’s water. The airport apologised following a CCTV review. ( Source: Khaosod )
A female security officer at Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi Airport has been suspended following a furious confrontation with a prominent Thai beauty influencer. The row began over drinking water for two young children but rapidly turned personal.
The influencer accused the officer of threatening to attack her after she made a remark about the employee’s family. Another security officer reportedly intervened as tensions mounted. However, the security company defended its employee and disputed the attempted assault allegation.
Airport management subsequently reviewed CCTV footage and found the officer’s conduct unacceptable. By Thursday, October 29, she had been removed from operational duties pending an investigation.
Water bottle dispute at Suvarnabhumi sparks confrontation between influencer and security officer
The confrontation occurred at 3.16 pm on Friday, October 23, at a domestic departure security checkpoint in Concourse B. The passenger was Thai beauty influencer Kotchawan Sajja, widely known as Gamgy.
She operates the Facebook page Gamgy Makeup and was travelling with family members, including her two children. The family approached the checkpoint carrying two bottles of drinking water and a separate children’s drinking flask. However, airport security restrictions prevented both bottles from passing through screening.
The female officer explained that liquids carried into aircraft cabins were subject to security controls. Nevertheless, exceptions could be made for drinking water, milk and food required by young children.
Accordingly, the employee permitted one bottle and the children’s flask through security. The second bottle was refused. Gamgy maintained that she intended to drink the remaining water before continuing her journey. Instead, she claimed the officer threw the bottle into a rubbish bin.
The influencer then asked for the discarded bottle to be returned. That request sparked the confrontation which eventually cost the officer her place on the security checkpoint. However, the two sides offered sharply different accounts of what happened next. Gamgy insisted she simply wanted to recover the water. The security company maintained that she also demanded the employee clean the bottle after retrieving it from the bin.
Security company defends officer as argument turns personal over influencer’s remark about her family
Airports of Thailand Aviation Security Company Limited (AOT AVSEC) directly employed and supervised the officer. In its official statement, the company defended her handling of the screening procedures.
It maintained that she had explained the restrictions politely and followed established regulations. Furthermore, it said the checkpoint was busy when Gamgy requested the discarded bottle. The officer was processing other passengers and could not undertake the requested cleaning.
According to AOT AVSEC, the refusal angered the influencer. The disagreement then moved beyond the original question of drinking water. During the exchange, Gamgy made a personal remark about the officer’s family. The comment became central to the subsequent confrontation, the company’s defence and the airport’s disciplinary investigation.
The remark was reported in Thai as “สงสัยมีปัญหาครอบครัว”. It suggested that the employee must have problems with her family. Gamgy made the comment during the increasingly heated argument over the discarded bottle. However, there was no evidence that the officer actually had family difficulties. The remark concerned the employee’s attitude rather than the security regulations.
Influencer claims officer threatened assault as airport management rejects security employee’s conduct
The confrontation intensified immediately afterwards. Gamgy claimed the officer approached her aggressively and appeared ready to physically attack her. She maintained that the threatening encounter unfolded in front of her two children.
Another security employee reportedly stepped in during the exchange. However, the available accounts do not establish that either woman physically assaulted the other.
The influencer subsequently accused the officer of threatening behaviour. In response, AOT AVSEC rejected the suggestion that its employee had attempted an assault. The company insisted the officer had challenged Gamgy about her personal remark.
It maintained that she had merely questioned why the passenger had referred to her family. Furthermore, the company described its employee as polite, professional and service-minded.
AOT AVSEC also insisted that the officer had followed international security standards. Its statement defended both the original screening decision and the employee’s subsequent conduct. Yet this account would soon clash with the conclusions reached by Suvarnabhumi Airport management.
The airport accepted that the influencer had made the personal remark. However, it subsequently determined that the officer’s response failed to meet required service standards.
Viral video exposes airport confrontation as officials examine silent CCTV and question both accounts
The dispute initially remained confined to the airport and those directly involved. Five days later, it became a public controversy. On Wednesday, October 28, Gamgy published footage of the confrontation on her Facebook page.
Her account described an argument over water for her children which developed into an apparent threat of violence. The footage quickly attracted online attention and prompted questions about both women’s behaviour.
Some social media commentators criticised Gamgy for referring to the employee’s family. Others questioned the officer’s conduct and the security company’s emphatic defence. Meanwhile, Suvarnabhumi Airport began examining the incident.
Management reviewed CCTV recordings and obtained information from employees who witnessed the confrontation. The airport subsequently released security camera footage alongside its official explanation.
However, the published CCTV footage contained no audio. Consequently, viewers could not establish the precise words exchanged between the passenger and the officer. The recording also failed to settle the competing claims about the verbal confrontation. Airport management therefore relied on its examination of the incident and information obtained from those involved.
Silent CCTV footage draws criticism as airport finds security officer’s response below service standards
The absence of sound provoked further criticism online. Some commentators questioned why the airport had released silent footage. Separately, others complained that the recording concentrated on the influencer’s face rather than showing the officer equally.
These objections added another dimension to the controversy. Nevertheless, airport management proceeded with its assessment and announced findings concerning the employee’s behaviour.
The airport confirmed that Gamgy’s remark about family problems preceded the officer’s inappropriate conduct. It also acknowledged that the confrontation had occurred under tense circumstances. Crucially, management concluded that the employee’s response did not meet expected service standards. This finding contradicted AOT AVSEC’s earlier description of the officer’s conduct as appropriate and professional.
The distinction concerned the officer’s reaction rather than the original security decision. Airport management did not conclude that the employee had wrongly enforced the liquid restrictions. Instead, it criticised her behaviour after the disagreement became personal. The airport maintained that staff were required to remain composed during difficult encounters with passengers.
Security officer suspended and airport apologises while rules on children’s drinking water remain
By Thursday, October 29, the controversy had produced direct disciplinary consequences. AOT AVSEC temporarily suspended the female officer from operational duties.
The suspension followed the airport’s review of the confrontation and the public dispute surrounding it. However, the employee was not dismissed. She was removed from duty while further inquiries continued.
The officer has not been publicly identified in the available reports. Airport management indicated that disciplinary action would follow if misconduct was established. At the same time, the company had already publicly defended her handling of the incident. No final disciplinary penalty had been confirmed by Sunday, November 1.
Suvarnabhumi Airport also issued a public apology over the confrontation. Management acknowledged that the employee’s conduct fell below its required standards. It stressed that security personnel must maintain emotional control and communicate professionally. Furthermore, staff were reminded to avoid unnecessary arguments with passengers, including those who became provocative or confrontational.
The airport’s response did not alter the underlying aviation security regulations. Thailand’s Civil Aviation Authority regulates passenger screening and cabin baggage security. Restrictions apply to liquids, gels and aerosols carried through airport checkpoints.
These measures are intended to prevent dangerous or prohibited items entering aircraft cabins. However, special consideration can be given to food, milk and drinking water required by young children.
Dispute over discarded water bottle exposes conflicting accounts of security officer’s behaviour
Such allowances remain subject to security screening. In this case, the family was carrying two water bottles and a separate flask. According to AOT AVSEC, the officer permitted one bottle for the children’s needs. She also allowed the flask through the checkpoint. Therefore, the dispute did not involve a complete refusal to provide drinking water for the children.
The argument concerned the additional bottle and its disposal. Gamgy said she wanted to drink its contents before proceeding to her flight. However, the company maintained that the bottle had already been placed in a rubbish bin.
It also claimed the influencer demanded that the employee retrieve and clean it. The officer reportedly refused because she was occupied with screening other passengers.
AOT AVSEC maintained that its employee had explained the regulations before the disagreement escalated. Furthermore, it insisted that the officer had acted within established security procedures. The company’s statement placed particular emphasis on the passenger’s dissatisfaction and subsequent personal remark. In contrast, airport management focused on the employee’s conduct after the exchange became heated.
The two official accounts therefore differed over the officer’s behaviour, not the basic screening restrictions. The security company defended her professional manner and disputed the allegation of attempted assault. Airport management subsequently found her response unacceptable. As a result, the employee was suspended despite her employer’s original defence.
Assault allegation remains disputed as online complaints mount over airport security staff conduct
The influencer’s accusation remained disputed throughout the controversy. Gamgy maintained that the officer approached her aggressively and appeared ready to attack. AOT AVSEC insisted that its employee had simply challenged the remark about her family.
Neither account established that physical violence occurred. Moreover, the available reports contained no confirmation of criminal charges against either woman.
The airport’s investigation consequently centred on workplace conduct and disciplinary standards. There was no confirmed criminal prosecution arising from the confrontation. The suspension was an employment measure rather than a criminal penalty. Likewise, the airport had not announced that the original security screening decision was improper.
The public reaction continued beyond the two women’s competing claims. Several social media users described previous encounters with airport security officers they considered unfriendly. Some complained about employees chatting while working or displaying poor service attitudes. However, these were individual online allegations rather than findings from the October 23 investigation.
Other commentators questioned AOT AVSEC’s description of the suspended officer as service-minded. The company’s defence had insisted that she maintained appropriate manners throughout the encounter. Yet airport management reached a different conclusion after examining the incident. That disagreement between the two official statements became a prominent feature of the affair.
Airport findings trace argument from family remark to officer’s conduct at domestic screening point
Notably, the airport’s findings acknowledged the influencer’s role in escalating the dispute. Her personal remark about family problems was recorded in the official account.
Nevertheless, management determined that the officer’s subsequent conduct warranted disciplinary scrutiny. The airport’s position therefore distinguished between the passenger’s remarks and the employee’s professional responsibilities.
The confrontation occurred at Thailand’s principal international aviation gateway. Suvarnabhumi handles both domestic and international flights, with security screening forming a central part of airport operations. In this instance, however, the dispute took place in the domestic departure area. It concerned a family travelling with children rather than an international passenger facing immigration procedures.
The location and timing were established in the security company’s account. The family entered the screening area at 3.16 pm on Friday, October 23. They were carrying two bottles of drinking water and a children’s flask. The officer allowed one bottle and the flask through security. The additional bottle was refused and subsequently discarded.
The dispute then developed over retrieving the bottle from the rubbish bin. According to the company, Gamgy wanted the employee to clean it. The employee refused because she was busy. The influencer then made the remark about family problems. Shortly afterwards, the confrontation escalated into accusations of threatening behaviour.
Airport apology and suspension follow CCTV review as company continues to deny attempted assault
The sequence became central to the airport’s findings. Management confirmed that the personal remark preceded the officer’s unacceptable response. However, it did not overturn the original decision concerning the water. The investigation instead addressed the conduct of the employee during the argument.
The public controversy unfolded several days after the confrontation itself. Gamgy published the footage on October 28, prompting official responses. Subsequently, the airport released silent CCTV images and its explanation. AOT AVSEC also issued a statement defending the employee. By October 29, the officer had been temporarily suspended from operational duties.
The airport’s apology followed its determination that the employee’s behaviour failed to meet required standards. However, the available material does not establish that the officer was dismissed or criminally charged. The company also continued to dispute the influencer’s attempted assault allegation in its published account.
Disciplinary investigation continues after airport rejects officer’s conduct in water bottle row
The case therefore remained an employment investigation rather than a confirmed criminal matter. Its central facts were established through the airport’s findings and the competing statements.
The liquid restrictions were enforced, one bottle was refused and the argument became personal. Subsequently, airport management found the officer’s conduct unacceptable and ordered further action.
As of Sunday, November 1, no final disciplinary outcome had been confirmed. The officer remained subject to a temporary suspension and investigation. Meanwhile, the airport had apologised and acknowledged that the confrontation breached its service standards. AOT AVSEC’s original account continued to dispute the influencer’s accusation of attempted assault.
The outstanding investigation concerns the employee’s conduct after the argument over drinking water escalated. The original screening decision remains unchanged in the available official findings. However, the officer has already been removed from operational duties following the confrontation. What began with a discarded bottle at a domestic security checkpoint ended with an official apology, suspension and disciplinary investigation.
Commerce Minister Suphajee talks about gold in an economy and world driven by US-China trade rivalry
Business leaders pile pressure on Thai Airways over vital air cargo artery for the kingdom’s exports to the world
Government takes a stronger hand as Thai Airways crisis at Suvarnabhumi Airport worsened Wednesday
Thai Airways admits it got it wrong as Suvarnabhumi Airport public areas are swamped by a baggage flood
Thai Airways CEO apologises for ongoing flooding crisis issues with defective carts and delayed flights
Military operations are expanded at Suvarnabhumi Airport as crisis is still not brought under control
Tourism minister directs acute airport baggage crisis caused by workers who failed to turn up for shifts
Royal Thai Army deployed to Suvarnabhumi Airport after baggage chaos gets the better of exhausted staff
Bangkok airports open and flights running but there are delays and baggage issues at Suvarnabhumi
Flooding tragedy in Samut Prakan near Bangkok. Two die from electrocution after family car is submerged
Engineers work through night after Sunday’s fire on Bangkok’s Blue Line saw more damage than thought
State Railway company brings charges against private drivers linked to last Saturday’s Bangkok train disaster
Police to review 58 rail crossings after 8 people died in train bus smash. Train driver had a drug habit
Arrested man linked with Chatuchak building collapse now tells police he is a Chinese state employee
James Morris is a pename for an international writer based in Bangkok who works on various international news media. He is a sub editor with the Thai Examiner news website since it began in 2015. Son Nguyen is an international writer and news commentator specialising in Thai news and current affairs. He commenced working with the Thai Examiner News Desk in May 2018.
All posts by James Morris and Son Nguyen
Lovesick Ayutthaya man kidnapped four month old infant from mother. Let her fall into river in the dark October 28, 2026 Four-month-old baby found dead in the Chao Phraya
Fresh arrest warrant application to be made for ‘Godd Dam’ page boss on Thursday as police expand case October 28, 2026 Who runs Godd Dam? Thai cyber police seek another
Minister scrambles to offer 15 day visa on arrival to smaller markets with reports of losses to Vietnam October 28, 2026 Thailand’s visa shake-up backfires ahead of high
Restaurant YouTube reviewer is a fraudster with an arrest warrant. Police complaint filed in Nonthaburi October 27, 2026 A food influencer’s demand for prawns, drinks or
Israeli arrested on drug and sex charges threatens police and well known detective Inspector Jae October 27, 2026 A Bangkok sex-and-drugs raid nets Israeli Tomer
Knock on the door coming for 10k visa overstayers now in Thailand as police launch new crackdown October 26, 2026 Thailand launches a nationwide hunt for over 10,000
19 year old hothead lands in jail after punching female driver who honked her car horn at him in Bangkok October 26, 2026 Terrifying scenes in Bangkok as a motorcyclist, 19,
Thailand falls behind Southeast Asian peers in race to build more flight connections as tourism fades October 24, 2026 High-season alarm for Thailand as direct international
Israeli woman on Koh Phangan faces deportation after her visa was revoked. Rising diplomatic tensions October 24, 2026 Israeli woman, 33, faces visa cancellation on Koh
American YouTuber brutally attacked robbed and beaten outside a Pattaya bar by two ‘foreign’ assailants October 22, 2026 American YouTuber Chris Barnes exposes a grim Pattaya
Prime Minister Anutin pushes a hard line on narcotics suppression which will jail even more yaba users October 22, 2026 Thailand’s drug crisis sees Anutin act with new
Departures tax to be axed as Thailand’s hotel sector reels from a debt crisis linked with the Covid era October 22, 2026 Revolt puts Thailand’s ฿1,000 departure tax in
12 properties raided, 85 people charged after Pattaya police raids linked to the illegal foreign ownership crackdown October 21, 2026 Police target ฿800 million in Pattaya property
Controversy on two wheels rages in Pattaya as city’s mototaxi drivers switch to blue vests from orange October 21, 2026 Blue replaces orange for 5,281 Pattaya motorcycle taxi
Queen Suthida meets the Emperor and Empress of Japan on a visit promoting international women’s ice hockey October 21, 2026 Queen Suthida meets Japan’s Emperor Naruhito and
Men accused of murdering Russian siblings in July plead guilty to all counts in Pattaya including rape October 20, 2026 Death penalty looms for two Thai men after guilty
Tourism industry shaken by the latest Chinese warning coming from its diplomatic missions in Thailand October 20, 2026 China warns its citizens of abductions and trafficking
French businessman wanted for VAT fraud arrested this Wednesday on Koh Samui after Interpol Notice October 28, 2026
Thailand’s GDP may get a bump up from the 3rd quarter after recent economic agency talks with PM Anutin October 28, 2026
Thousands of fake Thai citizens of Chinese origin identified in one case going back over two decades October 27, 2026
New police chief wants officers who show their faces to the public and issue warnings instead of fines October 27, 2026
Special Branch and cyber police move against the ‘Godd Dam’ Facebook page after PM ‘tea money’ fake October 26, 2026
Government spokesman’s rebuke to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Keep out of Thai internal affairs October 26, 2026
Mystery of Dutch TV star deepens as police confirm he left Thailand and lawyer claims he wants privacy October 25, 2026
Prime Minister in a spot as no confidence debate looks like it’s being stalled or postponed in parliament October 24, 2026
PM calls police chief and orders preparations to make sure Thailand is not subject to French like rioting October 22, 2026
Pledges on investment are up but Foreign Direct Investment for the first six months is down nearly 5% October 22, 2026
Frenchman arrested by Immigration. Officer spotted him on Interpol wanted list for drug trafficking October 22, 2026
Drunk woman stripped naked on a Pattaya public street Tuesday night hurling abuse. Arrested by police October 21, 2026
Former top Democrat Party aide and MP met DSI over Bhumjaithai MP’s husband’s links to online gambling October 21, 2026
Row over handling of two online gambling cases related to MPs. Questions of jurisdiction and fair play October 21, 2026
German family members injured in Phuket after app based taxi driver lost control of car looking at GPS October 20, 2026
Bhumjaithai MP and her husband answer questions of the elite DSI police over links to online gambling October 20, 2026
Hellish battle with UK Home Office for Brit seeking to bring Burmese fiancée and son home for Christmas October 20, 2026
7kg heroin in drink sachets bound for Australia found in a Samut Prakan premises after police tip off October 19, 2026
Much loved Robocop, a popular figure in Nonthaburi near Bangkok dies in a tragic road traffic accident October 19, 2026
Thai star Nene Royal faces trademark headaches in Thailand and South Korea as she secures her fortune October 18, 2026
Six dead in deadly clashes in Southern Thailand including a policeman killed on National Police Day October 17, 2026
Underfire southern MP says Prime Minister Anutin telephoned her and urged her to post a selfie online October 17, 2026
© 2026 Thai Examiner. All rights reserved.
2026年11月1日下午12:22
作者:詹姆斯·莫里斯和孙阮
在“犯罪”、“生活”、“媒体”、“泰国”类别下
曼谷素万那普机场一名女保安因儿童饮用水问题引发激烈争执,已被停职。泰国美妆博主Kotchawan Sajja(网名Gamgy)指控该保安当着她孩子的面威胁要殴打她。冲突起因是Gamgy对该保安的家庭问题发表了评论。然而,保安公司为其保安辩护,否认有任何袭击企图。五天后,一段在网上疯传的视频引发了机场的调查。监控录像显示,该保安的行为遭到管理层谴责,与雇主的辩护相矛盾,这使得争议更加激烈。截至10月29日(周四),该保安已被停职,等待纪律处分。机场方面道歉,但维持了原有的饮用水限制规定。与此同时,关于保安人员的各种说法和投诉不断涌现,使这场风波愈演愈烈,目前仍在审理中。
素万那普机场一名保安人员因网红Gamgy指控其威胁要袭击儿童饮水而遭到停职。机场方面在查看监控录像后道歉。(来源:Khaosod)
曼谷素万那普机场一名女保安因与一位泰国知名美妆博主发生激烈冲突而被停职。争执起因是两个小孩的饮用水问题,但很快演变成人身攻击。
这位网红指控该保安在她发表了关于其家人的言论后威胁要攻击她。据报道,随着紧张局势升级,另一名保安介入制止。然而,保安公司为其员工辩护,并否认了企图袭击的指控。
机场管理部门随后查看了监控录像,认为该警员的行为不可接受。截至10月29日星期四,她已被停职接受调查。
在素万那普机场,一名网红与一名保安因水瓶纠纷发生冲突。
冲突发生在10月23日星期五下午3点16分,地点是B航站楼国内出发安检处。涉事乘客是泰国美妆博主Kotchawan Sajja,广为人知的名字是Gamgy。
她运营着名为“Gamgy Makeup”的Facebook主页,此次旅行她与家人同行,其中包括她的两个孩子。一家人带着两瓶饮用水和一个儿童水壶来到安检处。然而,机场安检规定禁止携带饮用水和儿童水壶通过安检。
这位女官员解释说,携带进入飞机客舱的液体都要接受安检。不过,饮用水、牛奶和幼儿所需的食物可以例外。
因此,安检人员允许一瓶水和儿童水壶通过安检,但拒绝携带第二瓶水。Gamgy 坚称她打算喝完剩下的水后再继续行程。然而,她声称安检人员却把瓶子扔进了垃圾桶。
随后,这位网红要求归还被丢弃的瓶子。这一要求引发了冲突,最终导致该保安人员被解雇。然而,双方对接下来发生的事情各执一词。Gamgy坚称她只是想拿回水瓶。而保安公司则坚持认为,她还要求保安人员在从垃圾桶里取出瓶子后将其清洗干净。
一名网红发表了关于其家人的言论,引发争议,保安公司为其员工辩护,双方争执升级为人身攻击。
泰国机场航空安保有限公司(AOT AVSEC)直接雇佣并监管了这名安检员。该公司在其官方声明中为其处理安检程序的方式进行了辩护。
声明称,她已礼貌地解释了相关限制,并遵守了既定规定。此外,声明还表示,甘吉要求清理废弃瓶子时,检查站正忙于其他旅客的检查,工作人员当时正在处理其他旅客的事务,无法进行清理工作。
据AOT AVSEC公司称,拒绝供水激怒了这位网红。随后,争论的焦点从最初的饮用水问题转移到了其他方面。在争论过程中,Gamgy对该官员的家人发表了人身攻击言论。这一言论成为随后冲突、公司辩护以及机场纪律调查的核心。
据报道,这番话是用泰语说的“疑似有家庭问题”。言下之意是,这名员工可能存在家庭问题。Gamgy是在双方就丢弃的瓶子发生激烈争吵时说出这番话的。然而,并没有证据表明这名员工真的存在家庭困难。
网红声称一名警员威胁要对她进行人身攻击,机场管理方否认了该警员的行为。
随后冲突立即升级。加吉声称,警官咄咄逼人地接近她,似乎准备对她进行人身攻击。她坚称,这场充满威胁的冲突就发生在她的两个孩子面前。
据报道,另一名保安人员在冲突期间介入。然而,现有说法并未证实两名女子中任何一人对另一人实施了肢体攻击。
随后,这位网红指控该警官有威胁行为。对此,AOT AVSEC否认其员工曾试图进行人身攻击。该公司坚称,该警官只是就Gamgy的个人言论对她进行了质问。
该公司坚称,她只是询问那位乘客为何提及她的家人。此外,该公司还形容其员工礼貌、专业且服务周到。
AOT AVSEC公司坚称,该安检人员遵守了国际安保标准。其声明为最初的安检决定和该员工随后的行为辩护。然而,这一说法很快便与素万那普机场管理层的结论相悖。
机场方面承认该网红发表了针对个人的言论。然而,事后认定,机场工作人员的处理方式未能达到应有的服务标准。
一段疯传的视频曝光了机场冲突,官员们正在查看无声的监控录像,并对双方的说法提出质疑。
这场纠纷最初仅限于机场内部及相关人员之间。五天后,它演变成一场公开争议。10月28日星期三,甘吉在她的Facebook页面上发布了冲突视频。
她的描述是,她和对方因为孩子喝水的问题发生争执,随后演变成明显的暴力威胁。这段视频迅速在网上引起关注,并引发了人们对两位女性行为的质疑。
一些社交媒体评论员批评甘吉提及该员工的家人。另一些人则质疑该警官的行为以及保安公司极力辩护的做法。与此同时,素万那普机场已开始对此事展开调查。
管理层查看了监控录像,并从目睹冲突的员工处获取了信息。随后,机场公布了监控录像及其官方解释。
然而,公布的监控录像没有音频。因此,观看者无法确定乘客和警官之间具体的对话内容。录像也未能澄清关于此次口角冲突的各种说法。因此,机场管理部门只能依靠对事件的调查以及从相关人员处获得的信息来做出判断。
一段无声的监控录像引发批评,机场方面认为安保人员的反应低于服务标准。
视频中没有声音,这在网上引发了更多批评。一些评论者质疑机场为何发布无声视频。另一些人则抱怨说,录像只聚焦在网红的脸上,而没有平等地展现警官的画面。
这些反对意见使这场争议更加复杂。尽管如此,机场管理部门仍继续进行评估,并公布了有关该员工行为的调查结果。
机场方面证实,Gamgy关于家庭问题的言论先于该警员的不当行为。机场方面也承认,冲突发生在紧张的环境下。至关重要的是,管理层认定该员工的应对措施不符合预期的服务标准。这一结论与AOT AVSEC此前对该警员行为恰当且专业的描述相矛盾。
区别在于安检人员的反应,而非最初的安检决定。机场管理层并未认定该员工错误地执行了液体限制规定,而是批评了她在争执升级为人身攻击后的行为。机场方面坚持认为,员工在与乘客发生冲突时必须保持冷静。
一名安保人员被停职,机场就此事道歉,但儿童饮用水规定仍然有效。
截至10月29日星期四,这场争议已导致直接的纪律处分。航空安保行动小组暂时中止了这名女军官的行动职务。
机场方面对这起冲突事件及其引发的公众争议进行了调查后,决定暂停该员工的职务。但该员工并未被解雇,而是在接受进一步调查期间被暂时停职。
现有报道并未公开该名官员的身份。机场管理部门表示,如果不当行为属实,将采取纪律处分。与此同时,该公司已公开为其处理该事件的方式辩护。截至11月1日星期日,尚未确认最终的纪律处分决定。
素万那普机场也就此次冲突事件发表了公开道歉声明。管理层承认该员工的行为未达到规定标准,并强调安保人员必须保持情绪稳定,并以专业的态度进行沟通。此外,机场方面还提醒员工避免与乘客发生不必要的争执,包括那些具有挑衅性或对抗性的乘客。
机场的回应并未改变基本的航空安全规定。泰国民航局负责监管旅客安检和随身行李安全。携带液体、凝胶和气溶胶通过机场安检均受到限制。
这些措施旨在防止危险或违禁物品进入飞机客舱。但是,对于幼儿所需的食物、牛奶和饮用水,可以给予特殊考虑。
围绕被丢弃水瓶的争议暴露了保安人员行为的矛盾说法
此类许可仍需接受安全检查。本案中,这家人携带了两瓶水和一个保温瓶。据AOT AVSEC称,安检人员允许携带一瓶水供孩子饮用,并允许保温瓶通过检查站。因此,此次争议并非完全拒绝为孩子提供饮用水。
争论的焦点在于那瓶多余的饮料及其处理方式。甘吉表示她想在登机前喝完瓶子里的饮料。然而,航空公司坚称瓶子已被扔进垃圾桶。
报道称,这位网红还要求工作人员取回并清洗手机。据报道,该工作人员拒绝了,因为她当时正在检查其他乘客。
AOT AVSEC公司坚称,其员工在争执升级前已向乘客解释了相关规定。此外,该公司还坚持认为,该员工的行为完全符合既定的安全程序。该公司声明特别强调了乘客的不满及其随后的个人言论。相比之下,机场管理层则将重点放在了争执升级后该员工的行为上。
因此,两份官方说法的分歧在于该安保人员的行为,而非基本的安检限制。安保公司为她的专业行为辩护,并否认了企图袭击的指控。机场管理部门随后认为她的回应不可接受。结果,尽管其雇主最初为其辩护,该员工仍被停职。
尽管网上对机场安保人员行为的投诉不断增加,但有关袭击的指控仍存在争议。
在整个争议过程中,这位网红的指控始终存在争议。Gamgy坚称,那名警官态度咄咄逼人,似乎随时准备攻击她。AOT AVSEC公司则坚称,他们的员工只是对那名警官关于她家人的言论提出了质疑。
两份证词均未证实发生过肢体暴力。此外,现有报告也未确认对这两名女性提起过刑事指控。
因此,机场的调查重点放在了工作场所行为规范和纪律标准上。经确认,此次冲突并未引发刑事诉讼。停职属于劳动管理措施,而非刑事处罚。同样,机场也未宣布最初的安检决定不当。
公众的反应远不止于两位女性各自的说法。一些社交媒体用户描述了他们之前与机场安检人员的遭遇,认为他们态度不友好。有人抱怨安检人员边工作边聊天,或者服务态度恶劣。然而,这些都只是个别网友的指控,并非10月23日调查的结果。
其他评论员质疑AOT AVSEC公司对被停职安保人员“服务意识强”的描述。该公司辩称,她在整个事件过程中始终保持着得体的举止。然而,机场管理部门在调查事件后得出了不同的结论。两份官方声明之间的分歧成为该事件的一个显著特征。
机场调查结果显示,争吵源于家庭成员的言论,并最终导致安检人员在入境检查点的行为发生改变。
值得注意的是,机场的调查结果承认了这位网红在加剧争端中所扮演的角色。她在官方账号上发表的关于家庭问题的个人言论也被记录在案。
然而,管理层认定该官员随后的行为应受到纪律处分。因此,机场的立场是区分乘客的言论和员工的职业责任。
冲突发生在泰国主要的国际航空门户——素万那普机场。素万那普机场同时运营国内和国际航班,安检是机场运营的核心环节。然而,此次冲突发生在国内出发区域,涉及的是一个带着孩子的家庭,而非需要办理入境手续的国际旅客。
安保公司的记录证实了事件发生的地点和时间。这家人于10月23日星期五下午3点16分进入安检区域。他们携带了两瓶饮用水和一个儿童保温瓶。安检人员允许他们携带一瓶饮用水和一个儿童保温瓶通过安检,但拒绝携带另一瓶饮用水,随后该瓶饮用水被丢弃。
随后,双方因是否从垃圾桶中取出瓶子而产生争执。据该公司称,Gamgy要求员工清洗瓶子,但员工以忙碌为由拒绝了。之后,这位网红提到了家庭问题。不久之后,冲突升级,双方互相指责对方有威胁行为。
机场方面在审查闭路电视录像后道歉并暂停运营,但该公司仍否认发生袭击未遂事件。
这一过程成为机场调查结果的核心。管理层证实,那句人身攻击先于该工作人员的不当回应。然而,这并未推翻之前关于饮用水的决定。调查的重点在于该工作人员在争论期间的行为。
这场公众争议在冲突发生数日后才逐渐浮出水面。Gamgy于10月28日公布了相关视频,引发官方回应。随后,机场方面公布了无声监控录像及其解释。AOT AVSEC也发表声明为涉事员工辩护。截至10月29日,该员工已被暂时停职。
机场方面在认定该员工的行为不符合相关标准后发表了道歉声明。然而,现有资料并未显示该员工已被解雇或受到刑事指控。此外,该公司在其公开声明中继续否认了这位网红提出的企图袭击指控。
机场驳回警员在水瓶事件中的行为申诉后,纪律调查仍在继续。
因此,该案件仍属于雇佣调查,而非刑事案件。其核心事实是通过机场的调查结果和双方的说法确定的。
液体携带限制规定得到执行,一瓶液体被拒绝携带,双方发生争执,并演变为人身攻击。随后,机场管理部门认为该工作人员的行为不可接受,并下令采取进一步行动。
截至11月1日星期日,尚未确认最终的纪律处分结果。该警员仍处于临时停职和调查状态。与此同时,机场方面已就此事道歉,并承认此次冲突违反了其服务标准。AOT AVSEC公司在其官方声明中继续否认了该网红提出的企图袭击指控。
这项尚未结案的调查涉及该员工在因饮用水问题发生争执后的行为。根据现有的官方调查结果,最初的筛查决定保持不变。然而,该员工在冲突发生后已被停职。事件起因于国内安全检查站丢弃的一个水瓶,最终以正式道歉、停职和纪律调查告终。
商务部长苏帕吉谈及在受美中贸易竞争驱动的经济和世界中的黄金问题
商界领袖们就泰国航空向世界出口这一至关重要的航空货运通道施加压力
周三,泰国航空公司在素万那普机场的危机进一步恶化,政府采取了更强硬的措施。
泰国航空公司承认其应对失误,素万那普机场公共区域被大量行李淹没。
泰国航空公司首席执行官就持续不断的洪水危机问题、缺陷推车和航班延误致歉。
由于危机仍未得到控制,素万那普机场的军事行动范围已扩大。
旅游部长指示处理因工作人员未按时上班而导致的机场行李严重短缺危机。
行李混乱导致疲惫不堪的工作人员不堪重负,泰国皇家陆军已部署至素万那普机场。
曼谷机场已开放并有航班运行,但素万那普机场出现延误和行李问题。
曼谷附近北榄府发生洪灾悲剧,一辆汽车被淹,两人触电身亡。
周日曼谷地铁蓝线发生火灾,损失比预想的要严重,工程师们连夜抢修。
泰国国家铁路公司对与上周六曼谷火车事故有关的私人司机提起诉讼。
警方将对58个铁路道口进行审查,此前一起火车与巴士相撞事故造成8人死亡。火车司机曾有吸毒史。
因与乍都乍周末市场大楼倒塌事件有关的被捕男子现在告诉警方,他是中国国家雇员。
詹姆斯·莫里斯(James Morris)是一位常驻曼谷的国际作家,笔名,他为多家国际新闻媒体撰稿。自2015年泰国新闻网站Thai Examiner成立以来,他一直是该网站的副编辑。孙阮(Son Nguyen)是一位国际作家和新闻评论员,专长于泰国新闻和时事。他于2018年5月加入Thai Examiner新闻编辑部。
James Morris 和 Son Nguyen 的所有帖子
相思成疾的阿瑜陀耶男子从母亲身边绑架了四个月大的婴儿,并将其在夜色中扔进河里。2026年10月28日,这名四个月大的婴儿被发现溺亡在湄南河中。
警方将于周四再次申请逮捕令,追捕“Godd Dam”页面的幕后主使,并扩大调查范围(2026年10月28日) 谁在操控“Godd Dam”?泰国网络警察正在寻找另一名嫌疑人
据报道,越南遭受损失,部长紧急提出向较小市场提供15天落地签证(2026年10月28日)。泰国签证改革在疫情高峰期前适得其反。
一名餐厅YouTube点评博主涉嫌诈骗,已被警方通缉。警方于2026年10月27日在暖武里府立案调查。该美食博主要求提供虾、饮料或其他食品。
2026年10月27日,一名以色列男子因涉嫌毒品和性犯罪被捕,他威胁警方和知名侦探杰伊警督。曼谷警方突袭毒品和性犯罪案件,逮捕了以色列人托默。
泰国警方发起新一轮打击行动,追捕1万名签证逾期滞留者(2026年10月26日) 泰国在全国范围内展开搜捕行动,追捕超过1万名签证逾期滞留者
2026年10月26日,曼谷一名19岁摩托车手因殴打鸣笛女司机而被捕入狱。事发时曼谷一片混乱,一名19岁的摩托车手……
随着旅游业的衰退,泰国在建设更多航线连接方面落后于东南亚其他国家(2026年10月24日) 泰国旅游旺季警报:直航国际航线减少
一名以色列女子在帕岸岛面临签证被吊销后被驱逐出境。外交紧张局势加剧 2026年10月24日 一名33岁的以色列女子在帕岸岛面临签证被取消的困境
2026年10月22日,美国YouTube博主克里斯·巴恩斯在芭堤雅一家酒吧外遭到两名“外国”袭击者残忍袭击、抢劫和殴打。巴恩斯揭露了芭堤雅的黑暗面。
泰国总理阿努廷对毒品问题采取强硬立场,将有更多吸食冰毒者入狱 2026年10月22日 泰国毒品危机促使阿努廷采取新举措
泰国酒店业因新冠疫情引发的债务危机而遭受重创,离境税或将取消 2026年10月22日 民众抗议泰国1000泰铢的离境税
芭堤雅警方突击搜查12处房产,85人被控,此次行动与打击非法外资房产有关(2026年10月21日)。警方目标是芭堤雅价值8亿泰铢的房产。
芭堤雅两轮车争议:摩托出租车司机将背心颜色由橙色改为蓝色 2026年10月21日 芭堤雅5281辆摩托出租车司机将背心颜色由橙色改为蓝色
2026年10月21日,苏提达王后访问日本,旨在推广国际女子冰球运动,并会见了日本天皇和皇后。苏提达王后会见了日本天皇德仁。
两名被控于7月在芭堤雅谋杀俄罗斯兄妹的男子,于2026年10月20日认罪,承认所有指控,包括强奸罪。两名泰国男子因罪名成立,面临死刑。
泰国旅游业受到中国驻外使领馆最新警告的震动 2026年10月20日 中国警告其公民提防绑架和人口贩运
一名因涉嫌增值税欺诈而被通缉的法国商人于本周三在苏梅岛被捕,此前国际刑警组织于2026年10月28日发布了通缉令。
泰国经济机构近期与总理阿努廷举行会谈后,泰国第三季度GDP或将有所增长(2026年10月28日)
2026年10月27日,一项调查发现数千名冒充泰国公民的华裔人士,该案可追溯至二十多年前。
新任警察局长希望警员们公开露面,并以警告代替罚款。2026年10月27日
2026年10月26日,在总理“茶钱”造假事件曝光后,特别部门和网络警察对“Godd Dam”脸书页面采取行动
政府发言人驳斥世界卫生组织(世卫组织):不要干涉泰国内政 2026年10月26日
荷兰电视明星的神秘行踪愈发扑朔迷离,警方证实他已离开泰国,律师则声称他希望保持隐私。2026年10月25日
首相处境艰难,不信任投票辩论似乎将在议会陷入停滞或推迟(2026年10月24日)
总理召见警察局长,命令做好准备,确保泰国不会像法国那样在2026年10月22日发生骚乱。
投资承诺有所增加,但前六个月的外国直接投资下降了近5%(2026年10月22日)
一名法国男子因涉嫌贩毒被移民局逮捕。官员于2026年10月22日在国际刑警组织的通缉名单上发现了他的踪迹。
周二晚间,一名醉酒女子在芭堤雅街头被扒光衣服并辱骂他人。她于2026年10月21日被警方逮捕。
前民主党高级助手兼国会议员于2026年10月21日会见了泰国特别调查局,讨论泰自豪党议员的丈夫与网络赌博的关联。
围绕两起与议员有关的网络赌博案件处理方式的争议。管辖权和公平性问题 2026年10月21日
2026年10月20日,普吉岛发生一起车祸,一家德国人在乘坐网约车时因司机看GPS导航而失控受伤。
2026年10月20日,泰自豪党议员及其丈夫就网络赌博案接受泰国特警队(DSI)的质询。
一名英国男子试图将缅甸未婚妻和儿子带回家过圣诞节,却与英国内政部展开了一场艰苦卓绝的斗争(2026年10月20日)
2026年10月19日,警方根据线报在北榄府一处房屋内查获7公斤海洛因,这些海洛因藏在饮料袋中,原计划运往澳大利亚。
深受喜爱的“机械战警”(Robocop)是曼谷附近暖武里府的知名人物,于2026年10月19日因一场悲惨的交通事故去世。
泰国明星妮妮·罗亚尔(Nene Royal)在泰国和韩国面临商标纠纷,她正努力保住自己的财富。2026年10月18日
泰国南部发生致命冲突,造成六人死亡,其中包括一名在2026年10月17日国家警察日当天殉职的警察。
备受争议的南方议员称,总理阿努廷于2026年10月17日致电她,敦促她在网上发布一张自拍照。
© 2026 Thai Examiner。版权所有。