← 返回新闻首页
马来西亚本地

‘Flabbergasted’: Lawyer says lock-up attire, handcuffs were not former TH chairman Abdul Azeez’s choice

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 10 — Former Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim’s lawyer has reportedly rejected the Malaysian Anti-Corruption...

Malay MailMalay Mail查看原文 ↗
律师称,前TH主席阿卜杜勒·阿齐兹并未选择囚服和手铐,他对此感到“震惊”。

Former Lembaga Tabung Haji chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim's lawyer, Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad, disputed the MACC's claim that Azeez personally chose to appear in court wearing a purple lock-up shirt and handcuffs.

Azeez was held in police custody and was required to don the attire just before a hearing, with police placing the handcuffs on him.

The lawyer criticized the MACC's account, suggesting potential legal action for misleading narratives.

Azeez has pleaded not guilty to corruption charges related to influencing investments and has been granted bail.

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 10 — Former Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim’s lawyer has reportedly rejected the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) assertion that his client chose to appear in court wearing a purple lock-up shirt and handcuffs yesterday.

According to The Edge , Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad said Azeez remained in police custody throughout the day and was instructed to change into the lock-up attire shortly before a Sessions Court heard the police’s remand application.

He said the police had also placed the handcuffs on Azeez before taking him directly to another Sessions Court for the MACC charge, leaving him no opportunity to change.

“Accordingly, our client’s appearance in the purple lock-up attire and handcuffs during the subsequent MACC proceedings was not a matter of his personal choice,” he said.

Amer said he was “flabbergasted” by the MACC’s account and warned that Azeez reserved the right to take legal action against anyone who published what he described as a false or misleading version of events.

Azeez yesterday pleaded not guilty to using his position to influence TH’s approval of a RM193.5 million investment in Putrajaya Perdana Bhd, a company in which he was alleged to have an interest, and was granted bail of RM450,000 with two local sureties.

‘No need to erase history’: Wanita Umno defends Najib’s legacy amid ‘legal process’

Ceiling fire at Jengka Hospital wards forces 17 to evacuate, no injuries reported

Man killed by elephant while searching for missing cow in Kuala Krai

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻