Najib’s house arrest explained: 10 questions about pardons, prison powers and what happens next纳吉布软禁案详解:关于赦免、监狱权力以及后续发展的10个问题
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 23 — Malaysia does not have a specific house-arrest law. Yet the Prisons Department already has powers that can, under certain conditions, allow prisoners to...

Malaysia lacks specific house-arrest legislation; however, the Prisons Department can allow prisoners to serve parts of their sentences outside prison under certain conditions.
This mechanism gained attention after former Prime Minister Najib Razak received a conditional pardon to serve the remainder of his SRC International jail sentence under house arrest until August 2028, contingent upon a RM50 million fine.
The authority to release prisoners on licence is provided under Section 43 of the Prison Act and allows for temporary release with conditions.
Meanwhile, Najib's conviction in the 1MDB case remains unaffected by this pardon, as his appeal is still pending.
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 23 — Malaysia does not have a specific house-arrest law. Yet the Prisons Department already has powers that can, under certain conditions, allow prisoners to remain outside prison while their sentences are still running.
That distinction has come into focus after former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was granted a conditional pardon on September 18 allowing him to serve the remainder of his SRC International jail sentence under house arrest until August 23, 2028, subject to payment of a RM50 million fine and other conditions.
How does the arrangement work? What powers do the prison authorities already have, how is that different from a royal pardon, and what happens to Najib’s separate 1MDB sentence?
Here is a simplified guide based on the Prison Act 1995, the Prisons Regulations 2000, court judgments and news reports.
1. What were the terms of Najib’s September 18 conditional pardon?
Najib was granted a conditional pardon allowing him to serve the remainder of his SRC International jail sentence under house arrest until August 23, 2028, subject to payment of the RM50 million fine and compliance with other conditions.
If Najib breaches any of the conditions, the conditional pardon will be revoked and he must immediately serve the remainder of his sentence in prison.
The pardon does not mean Najib was immediately transferred home.
As of September 21, Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar said Najib had yet to pay the RM50 million fine. Until that condition is fulfilled and the necessary process is completed, Najib remains in Kajang Prison.
2. Does Malaysia actually have a law specifically governing house arrest?
Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail has said Malaysia does not yet have a specific law governing house arrest, although such legislation had previously been proposed for eligible remand detainees as part of efforts to reduce prison overcrowding.
The issue was also addressed by the High Court in December 2025, when then High Court judge Alice Loke ruled that an earlier order for Najib to serve his sentence under house arrest was invalid because it had not been deliberated or decided at the relevant Pardons Board meeting.
“In any event, I am of the view that a house arrest order is not capable of execution, there being no legal provision for such mechanism in Malaysia,” she said.
The judge also rejected Najib’s lawyers’ argument that Section 43 of the Prison Act could be used to implement that particular house-arrest order.
She said Section 43 gives prison authorities discretion over how long a prisoner may remain outside prison, whereas the disputed order specified how long Najib was to remain outside prison and restricted the authorities’ discretion to recall him to prison.
The judge nevertheless indicated that Najib could separately apply to the Prisons Department for release under Section 43.
3. So what power does the Prisons Department already have?
Under Section 43 of the Prison Act, the Commissioner General of Prisons may release a prisoner on licence and impose conditions on that release.
The release may be granted “at any time”.
If a prisoner fails to comply with any of the conditions imposed, they can face a maximum fine of RM2,000, a maximum jail term of two years, or both.
The Commissioner General may also modify or cancel the conditions of the licence, recall the prisoner to prison and subsequently release the prisoner on licence again.
In other words, release on licence provides a legal mechanism for a prisoner to remain outside prison while the original jail sentence is still running.
4. Could release on licence mean serving time at home?
Under Regulation 111 of the Prisons Regulations 2000, the Commissioner General may release on licence a prisoner who has served at least four years of their sentence and impose conditions on that release.
That could potentially allow a prisoner to spend part of their sentence at home, if the Commissioner General specifies that as the place where they are required to remain.
The regulations do not spell out in detail other aspects of a prisoner’s life while released on licence, such as whether they may live with family members, receive visitors or communicate freely with people outside.
By comparison, the regulations contain detailed rules governing prisoners who remain in prison, including communication with relatives and friends, the frequency and duration of visits and the number of visitors permitted at one time.
Attorney General Mohd Dusuki said the Prisons Department is expected to issue standard operating procedures for Najib’s house-arrest arrangement, including rules covering visits, security and the monitoring of his movements.
5. Has Section 43 been used before?
During a High Court hearing on November 24, 2025, Najib’s lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah claimed that Section 43 and Regulation 111 had previously been used to allow prisoners to spend periods of their sentences outside prison.
Shafee claimed the provisions had been used to allow Tun H.S. Lee’s grandson, Kenneth Lee Fook Mun — whose death sentence had been commuted to life imprisonment following a pardon — to serve the remainder of his jail term at home because his “aged father” was living there alone.
Shafee also argued before judge Alice Loke that Section 43 had been used to temporarily release a prisoner for a week to spend Hari Raya with his family, citing a June 4, 2019 news report titled “Kajang prison inmate gets to spend Raya at home with family”.
These were arguments put forward by Najib’s lawyer during the proceedings.
6. Who granted Najib the conditional pardon?
Short answer: The Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, granted the conditional pardon following the 64th meeting of the Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya on September 18.
Under Article 42 of the Federal Constitution, the Agong has the power to grant pardons for offences committed in the Federal Territories.
The Agong presides over meetings of the Federal Territories Pardons Board and exercises his pardoning power in accordance with the constitutional process involving the board.
Before the board gives its advice, it is required to consider the Attorney General’s written opinion on the matter.
Based on news reports, the Federal Territories Pardons Board currently includes Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, Federal Territories Minister Hannah Yeoh and former Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain.
The announcement of Najib’s conditional pardon came from the Prime Minister’s Department’s Legal Affairs Division, or BHEUU, which serves as the Pardons Board’s secretariat.
7. What happened with Najib’s first SRC pardon and the earlier house-arrest order?
Najib has been in prison since August 23, 2022, after the Federal Court upheld his conviction in the SRC International case.
His original sentence was 12 years’ jail and a RM210 million fine.
In January 2024, his jail term was reduced to six years and his fine to RM50 million following a Federal Territories Pardons Board meeting.
The reduced sentence carried an official release date of August 23, 2028 if the RM50 million fine was paid, or August 23, 2029 if it remained unpaid.
A separate add-on or addendum order by the then Agong purportedly allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.
But in December 2025, the High Court ruled that the addendum was constitutionally invalid because it had not been deliberated or decided at the Pardons Board meeting.
“The addendum order was not deliberated nor decided in the 61st Pardons Board meeting. There was no compliance with Article 42, consequently it is not a valid order,” the judge said.
Najib initially appealed against the decision but withdrew his appeal in April 2026.
The September 18 conditional pardon is therefore a separate and later decision by the Pardons Board and the King.
8. Could Najib’s SRC jail term end earlier?
Under Regulation 43, prisoners can get a one-third remission or reduction of their jail sentence, with the aim of encouraging good behaviour.
There has, however, been no announcement that Najib has been granted remission or that his SRC sentence has been shortened further on this basis.
Under the terms of his earlier pardon, Najib’s release date was stated as August 23, 2028 if he pays the RM50 million fine, or August 23, 2029 if the fine remains unpaid.
His latest conditional pardon allows him to serve the remainder of that sentence under house arrest until August 23, 2028, provided the stipulated conditions are fulfilled.
9. What about Najib’s 1MDB conviction and jail sentence?
The pardons discussed above concern Najib’s SRC International conviction.
On December 26, 2025, the High Court found Najib guilty in the RM2 billion 1MDB case and sentenced him to 15 years in prison, with that sentence ordered to begin after he completes his SRC sentence.
Najib is appealing against his conviction and sentence in the 1MDB case, and the Court of Appeal has yet to hear the appeal.
There have been no reports so far that Najib has applied for or obtained a stay of the 1MDB prison sentence pending the outcome of his appeal.
10. What happens next?
For now, Najib remains in Kajang Prison.
His lawyers said on September 20 that his transfer to house arrest depends on the conditions attached to the conditional pardon being fulfilled and that, until the fine is paid, he will remain in prison.
The Attorney General confirmed the following day that the RM50 million fine had not yet been paid and said payment must be made at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Registrar’s Office.
The Prisons Department is also expected to issue SOPs governing the practical implementation of the house-arrest arrangement.
Once the required conditions are met, the process for moving Najib from Kajang Prison to house arrest can proceed.
Recommended reading:
Saifuddin Nasution: Proposed House Arrest Act focuses on remand detainees and prison overcrowding
AG: Najib’s family hasn’t paid RM50m fine, house arrest still on hold
AG says Prisons Dept to issue SOPs for Najib’s house arrest, RM50m fine must be paid
High Court: Najib’s house arrest order can’t be carried out, since no laws for this in Malaysia
Najib’s house arrest case: Agong as ‘constitutional monarch’ means ruler’s powers must follow Constitution, court says
Explained: Why did Najib lose his house arrest bid at the High Court?
Melaka election ahead: Key players, shifting alliances and the possible implications for Putrajaya
‘Sometimes I make only RM5’: Traders struggle as Rantau Panjang’s once-bustling bazaar falls quiet
Selangor Malay Reserve Land up 1,084.55 hectares since 2018, says Amirudin
马来西亚没有专门的居家监禁立法;但是,监狱部门可以在特定条件下允许囚犯在监狱外服刑。
前首相纳吉布·拉扎克获得有条件赦免后,这一机制引起了人们的关注。纳吉布·拉扎克被允许在家监禁,以服完他在 SRC 国际监狱服刑的剩余刑期,直至 2028 年 8 月,但需缴纳 5000 万令吉的罚款。
《监狱法》第 43 条赋予了对囚犯进行有条件释放的权力,允许在有条件的情况下暂时释放囚犯。
与此同时,纳吉布在 1MDB 案中的定罪不受此次赦免的影响,因为他的上诉仍在审理中。
吉隆坡,9月23日讯——马来西亚没有专门的居家监禁法。然而,监狱部门在特定情况下拥有权力,允许囚犯在刑期尚未结束期间留在监狱外。
前首相拿督斯里纳吉·拉扎克于 9 月 18 日获得有条件赦免,获准在家监禁至 2028 年 8 月 23 日,以支付 5000 万令吉罚款和其他条件,此后,这一区别变得更加引人注目。
这种安排是如何运作的?监狱当局已经拥有哪些权力?这与皇家赦免有何不同?纳吉布因1MDB案而受到的单独判决又将如何处理?
以下是根据 1995 年《监狱法》、2000 年《监狱条例》、法院判决和新闻报道编写的简化指南。
1. 纳吉布9月18日有条件赦免的条款是什么?
纳吉布获得有条件赦免,允许他居家监禁至 2028 年 8 月 23 日,以服完 SRC 国际监狱剩余刑期,但需支付 5000 万令吉罚款并遵守其他条件。
如果纳吉布违反任何条件,有条件赦免将被撤销,他必须立即在监狱服完剩余刑期。
赦免并不意味着纳吉布立即被送回国。
截至9月21日,总检察长丹斯里莫哈末杜苏基莫克塔尔表示,纳吉尚未缴纳5000万令吉的罚款。在满足该条件并完成必要程序之前,纳吉仍将被关押在加影监狱。
2. 马来西亚是否有专门针对软禁的法律?
内政部长拿督斯里赛夫丁·纳苏蒂安·伊斯梅尔表示,马来西亚目前还没有专门针对居家监禁的法律,尽管此前曾有人提议对符合条件的还押候审人员实施此类立法,以减少监狱过度拥挤的情况。
2025 年 12 月,高等法院也审理了这个问题。当时,高等法院法官艾丽斯·洛克裁定,此前纳吉布在家监禁服刑的命令无效,因为该命令未经相关赦免委员会会议审议或决定。
“无论如何,我认为软禁令无法执行,因为马来西亚没有相关的法律规定,”她说。
法官还驳回了纳吉布律师的论点,即《监狱法》第 43 条可用于执行该项特定的居家监禁令。
她表示,第 43 条赋予监狱当局自由裁量权,决定囚犯可以在监狱外停留多久,而有争议的命令则明确规定了纳吉布可以在监狱外停留多久,并限制了当局将其召回监狱的自由裁量权。
不过,法官表示,纳吉布可以根据第 43 条单独向监狱部门申请释放。
3. 那么监狱部门目前拥有哪些权力?
根据《监狱法》第 43 条,监狱总监可以有条件地释放囚犯,并对释放施加条件。
可以“随时”批准释放。
如果囚犯不遵守任何规定,他们可能面临最高 2000 令吉的罚款、最高两年的监禁,或两者并罚。
总署长还可以修改或取消许可证的条件,将囚犯召回监狱,随后再次以许可证的形式释放囚犯。
换句话说,假释为囚犯提供了一种合法机制,使其在原刑期仍在服刑期间可以留在监狱外。
4. 获得假释是否意味着可以在家服刑?
根据 2000 年监狱条例第 111 条规定,监狱总署署长可以对服刑至少四年的囚犯予以假释,并对假释附加条件。
如果监狱总署署长指定囚犯必须在家中服刑,那么囚犯有可能在家中度过部分刑期。
相关规定并未详细说明囚犯获释后生活的其他方面,例如他们是否可以与家人同住、接待访客或与外界人士自由交流。
相比之下,相关规定包含了对仍在监狱服刑的囚犯的详细规定,包括与亲友的沟通、探视的频率和时长以及一次允许的访客人数。
总检察长莫哈末·杜苏基表示,监狱部门预计将发布纳吉布居家监禁安排的标准操作程序,包括探视、安保和行动监控等方面的规定。
5. 第 43 条以前是否使用过?
在 2025 年 11 月 24 日的高等法院听证会上,纳吉的律师丹斯里穆罕默德·沙菲·阿卜杜拉声称,第 43 条和第 111 条规定以前曾被用来允许囚犯在监狱外服刑一段时间。
沙菲声称,这些条款被用来允许敦汉生的孙子李福文(Kenneth Lee Fook Mun)——他的死刑在获得赦免后被减为无期徒刑——在家中服完剩余的刑期,因为他的“年迈父亲”独自一人住在那里。
沙菲还向法官艾丽斯·洛克辩称,第 43 条曾被用来暂时释放一名囚犯一周,让他与家人一起过开斋节,并引用了 2019 年 6 月 4 日一篇题为“加影监狱囚犯获准回家与家人共度开斋节”的新闻报道。
这些是纳吉布的律师在庭审过程中提出的论点。
6. 谁给予纳吉布有条件赦免?
简短的回答:国家元首。
9月18日,马来西亚最高元首苏丹易卜拉欣在吉隆坡、纳闽和布城联邦直辖区赦免委员会第64次会议后,有条件地赦免了此人。
根据联邦宪法第 42 条,最高元首有权赦免在联邦直辖区内犯下的罪行。
最高元首主持联邦直辖区赦免委员会的会议,并按照宪法规定的程序向该委员会行使赦免权。
在委员会提出建议之前,必须考虑司法部长就此事的书面意见。
根据新闻报道,联邦直辖区赦免委员会目前成员包括总检察长丹斯里莫哈末·杜苏基·莫克塔尔、联邦直辖区部长杨巧双和前警察总监丹斯里拉扎鲁丁·侯赛因。
纳吉布获得有条件赦免的消息是由首相署法律事务司(BHEUU)宣布的,该司同时也是赦免委员会的秘书处。
7. 纳吉布第一次获得特别选举委员会赦免以及之前的软禁令发生了什么?
自 2022 年 8 月 23 日联邦法院维持 SRC 国际案的定罪以来,纳吉布一直被关押在监狱中。
他最初被判处 12 年监禁和 2.1 亿令吉罚款。
2024 年 1 月,在联邦直辖区赦免委员会的一次会议上,他的刑期被减至六年,罚款被减至 5000 万令吉。
如果缴纳 5000 万令吉的罚款,减刑后的正式释放日期为 2028 年 8 月 23 日;如果罚款未缴纳,则释放日期为 2029 年 8 月 23 日。
据称,当时的最高元首颁布的一项附加令或补充令允许纳吉布在家中软禁期间服完剩余刑期。
但2025年12月,高等法院裁定该附加条款在宪法上无效,因为它未经赦免委员会会议审议或决定。
法官表示:“第61届赦免委员会会议既未审议也未决定这项补充命令。该命令不符合第42条的规定,因此无效。”
纳吉布最初对该决定提出上诉,但在 2026 年 4 月撤回了上诉。
因此,9 月 18 日的有条件赦免是赦免委员会和国王之后做出的另一项决定。
8. 纳吉布的SRC监狱刑期有可能提前结束吗?
根据第 43 条规定,囚犯可以获得三分之一的刑期减免,目的是鼓励良好行为。
然而,目前尚未宣布纳吉布已获得减刑,或者基于此进一步缩短了其刑期。
根据他之前的赦免条款,如果纳吉布支付 5000 万令吉的罚款,他的释放日期为 2028 年 8 月 23 日;如果罚款仍未支付,他的释放日期为 2029 年 8 月 23 日。
他最近获得的有条件赦免允许他居家监禁至 2028 年 8 月 23 日,以完成剩余刑期,前提是必须满足规定的条件。
9. 纳吉布因1MDB案被定罪并被判入狱,情况如何?
上述赦免涉及纳吉布的 SRC 国际公司罪名。
2025年12月26日,高等法院裁定纳吉布在1MDB 20亿令吉案中罪名成立,判处其15年监禁,该刑期应在其服完SRC刑期后开始执行。
纳吉布正在就 1MDB 案的定罪和量刑提出上诉,上诉法院尚未审理此案。
截至目前,还没有任何报道称纳吉布已申请或获得暂缓执行1MDB监狱刑期的许可,等待其上诉结果。
10. 接下来会发生什么?
目前,纳吉仍被关押在加影监狱。
他的律师在 9 月 20 日表示,他能否被转移到居家监禁取决于有条件赦免所附带的条件是否得到满足,并且在罚款缴纳之前,他将继续被关押在监狱中。
第二天,总检察长证实,5000万令吉的罚款尚未缴纳,并表示必须在吉隆坡高等法院注册处缴纳。
监狱部门预计还将发布标准作业程序,以规范居家监禁安排的实际执行。
一旦满足必要条件,就可以启动将纳吉从加影监狱转移到居家监禁的程序。
推荐阅读:
赛夫丁·纳苏蒂安:拟议的居家监禁法案重点关注还押候审人员和监狱过度拥挤问题
AG:纳吉家族尚未缴纳5000万令吉罚款,软禁仍暂缓执行。
总检察长表示,监狱部门将发布纳吉软禁的标准作业程序,并要求支付5000万令吉的罚款。
高等法院:纳吉布的软禁令无法执行,因为马来西亚没有相关法律。
纳吉布软禁案:法院称,最高元首作为“立宪君主”,意味着统治者的权力必须遵循宪法。
解析:纳吉布为何在高等法院申请软禁失败?
马六甲州选举临近:关键人物、不断变化的联盟以及对布城可能产生的影响
“有时我只能赚到5令吉”:兰道班让曾经熙熙攘攘的集市如今冷清萧条,商贩们苦苦挣扎
阿米鲁丁表示,自2018年以来,雪兰莪马来保护区土地增加了1,084.55公顷