Spell out the offence: Aminudin challenges Negeri MB over royal dispute allegations

Former Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun, has urged the current Menteri Besar, Datuk Ismail Lasim, to clarify alleged shortcomings of the previous administration, particularly regarding state traditions and royal institution issues.

Aminuddin insists the public deserves specifics on any claimed breaches of the Negeri Sembilan Constitution (UUTKNS) 1959 during his tenure, including when these occurred.

He expressed readiness to provide documentation to substantiate decisions made during his time in office.

Additionally, Aminuddin questioned Ismail's decision to sign a proclamation document related to the Yang Dipertuan Besar's position, which Aminuddin had previously opted not to sign over process concerns.

SEREMBAN, Sept 25 — Former Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun has called on current Menteri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim to specify the alleged shortcomings of the previous administration that led to issues involving the state’s customary traditions and royal institution.

Aminuddin said the public had the right to know what actions were allegedly not taken during his tenure as Menteri Besar, including the specific provisions of the Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan (UUTKNS) 1959 that were allegedly breached and when the alleged violation occurred.

"What actions were said to have been overlooked? Which provisions of the UUTKNS 1959 were allegedly breached and when did the alleged breach occur?

"If there was an offence, state clearly what it was. If there was a violation of the law, identify the relevant provision. On an issue of this magnitude, the public deserves clear and verifiable facts,” he said in a Facebook post today.

Aminuddin said he was prepared to take responsibility for decisions made during his tenure as Menteri Besar by providing relevant documents, dates and legal provisions based on official records.

Yesterday, Ismail said the issue in the state did not stem from the current administration but was a problem inherited from the previous government.

Meanwhile, the Port Dickson Member of Parliament also questioned Ismail’s decision to sign a proclamation document related to the position of the Yang Dipertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, despite previously choosing not to sign the same document.

Aminuddin said the proclamation document dated April 19 was presented to him on April 20 while he was still Menteri Besar, for his signature under Article 10(2) of the UUTKNS 1959.

"I decided not to sign the document. If I, as Menteri Besar at the time, could make that decision due to doubts over the process, how could the signature of the next Menteri Besar appear on the same document?

"Datuk Ismail, with his legal background, would certainly understand the importance of the process. The issue involving Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir is about whether the process was properly followed or had flaws from the beginning,” he said.

Aminuddin said Article 10 of the UUTKNS 1959 not only covers matters relating to the powers concerning the position of the Yang Dipertuan Besar, but also sets out procedures that must be fulfilled, including matters related to a full and complete inquiry. — Bernama

Negeri Sembilan Undang, disputed chiefs: Conference of Rulers told of Tunku Nadzaruddin’s succession

Negeri Sembilan undangs tell PM, AGC to stay out of state affairs

Najib may walk out of Kajang Prison next month if High Court stays 15-year 1MDB sentence and RM50m fine is paid, says lawyer

前森美兰州务大臣拿督斯里阿米努丁哈伦敦促现任州务大臣拿督依斯迈拉欣澄清前朝政府所指控的缺陷，特别是在国家传统和皇家机构问题方面。

阿米努丁坚持认为，公众有权了解在他任职期间任何违反 1959 年森美兰州宪法 (UUTKNS) 的具体情况，包括这些情况发生的时间。

他表示愿意提供文件证明其在任期间所作出的决定。

此外，阿米努丁还质疑伊斯梅尔签署与最高元首职位相关的公告文件的决定，阿米努丁此前曾因程序问题而选择不签署该文件。

芙蓉9月25日——前森美兰州务大臣拿督斯里阿米努丁哈伦呼吁现任州务大臣拿督依斯迈拉欣指出前任政府所存在的缺陷，这些缺陷导致了涉及该州传统传统和王室机构的问题。

阿米努丁表示，公众有权知道在他担任森美兰州务大臣期间，据称有哪些行动没有采取，包括据称违反了 1959 年森美兰州宪法的具体条款，以及据称的违规行为发生的时间。

“据称哪些行为被忽视了？据称违反了1959年《统一贸易规则》的哪些条款，以及据称的违规行为发生在何时？”

“如果存在违法行为，请明确说明是什么违法行为。如果违反了法律，请指出相关条款。在如此重大的问题上，公众理应获得清晰且可核实的事实，”他今天在脸书上发帖说道。

阿米努丁表示，他准备根据官方记录提供相关文件、日期和法律条文，为他在担任州务大臣期间做出的决定承担责任。

昨天，伊斯梅尔表示，该州的问题并非源于现任政府，而是从上届政府遗留下来的问题。

与此同时，波德申国会议员也质疑伊斯迈尔签署与森美兰州最高元首职位相关的公告文件的决定，尽管他之前曾选择不签署同一份文件。

阿米努丁表示，4 月 19 日的公告文件于 4 月 20 日呈交给他，当时他还是州务大臣，需要根据 1959 年《统一国家法》第 10(2) 条签署。

“我决定不签署这份文件。如果我当时作为州务大臣，因为对程序存疑而做出这样的决定，那么下一任州务大臣的签名又怎么可能出现在同一份文件上呢？”

“以拿督伊斯迈的法律背景，他肯定明白这一程序的重要性。端姑慕赫里兹·端姑慕纳维尔所面临的问题在于，这一程序是否得到正确执行，还是从一开始就存在缺陷，”他说。

阿米努丁表示，1959年《国家权力条例》第十条不仅涵盖了与最高元首权力相关的事项，还规定了必须履行的程序，包括进行全面彻底调查的相关事宜。——马新社

森美兰温当，有争议的酋长：统治者会议通报东姑纳扎鲁丁的继任

森美兰州法律要求首相和总检察署不要干涉州内事务。

律师称，如果高等法院暂缓执行纳吉布因1MDB丑闻被判处的15年监禁，且其缴纳5000万令吉罚款，纳吉布下个月可能就会走出加影监狱。