College student fails to strike out murder charge over Jalan Ampang collision that killed couple

In a Kuala Lumpur High Court ruling, a college student, Danish Raman Kamar Kumaresan, failed in his attempt to have a murder charge dismissed over a fatal collision that resulted in the deaths of a married couple.

High Court Judge Datuk Aslam Zainuddin upheld the prosecution's preliminary objection, indicating that the attempt to strike out the charge was irregular under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.

Danish Raman argued that the charge of murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code was filed in bad faith and violated constitutional rights, but the court did not accept this reasoning.

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 30 — A college student today failed in his bid to have a murder charge against him struck out in connection with the deaths of a married couple in a collision on Jalan Ampang, near Great Eastern Mall here, four months ago.

High Court Judge Datuk Aslam Zainuddin made the ruling after allowing the prosecution’s preliminary objection to the application filed by Danish Raman Kamar Kumaresan on August 5.

“After examining the submissions of both parties, the court allows the prosecution’s preliminary objection. Accordingly, the accused’s application to strike out the murder charge is dismissed,” said the judge.

Today’s proceedings were attended by deputy public prosecutor Mohamad Fadhly Mohd Zamry and lawyer Donald Selvam, who represented Danish Raman.

The prosecution raised the preliminary objection on the grounds that the applicant’s bid to strike out the charge was irregular and did not comply with the provisions under the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.

Danish Raman, 24, sought to have the charge struck out, arguing that the prosecution’s decision to charge him under Section 302 of the Penal Code for a road accident case was mala fide, that is, in bad faith.

He further contended that the decision was unreasonable and in breach of Articles 5 and 8 of the Federal Constitution.

On May 15, Danish Raman was charged at the Magistrates’ Court here with the murder of senior citizen A. Doraisingam, 61, and his wife A. Menagah, 56, on Jalan Ampang, travelling from the direction of KLCC towards Ampang Point, at 5.30am on May 2.

The couple died from severe head injuries after the Honda Wave Alpha motorcycle they were riding was struck from behind by a Toyota Vios driven by the man.

He was charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which provides for the death penalty or imprisonment of between 30 and 40 years, and a minimum of 12 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. — Bernama

Sarawak Flying Doctor Service helicopter crash: Police find no indication of foul play

Bidor petrol station shooting: Man hospitalised with bullet wound to shoulder

Man jailed two weeks for trespassing at house linked to Sarawak deputy premier’s wife

吉隆坡高等法院的一项裁决驳回了大学生丹麦·拉曼·卡马尔·库马雷桑 (Danish Raman Kamar Kumaresan) 要求撤销谋杀指控的请求，该指控与一起导致一对夫妇死亡的致命车祸有关。

高等法院法官拿督阿斯拉姆·扎因努丁支持了控方的初步反对意见，指出根据 1964 年《法院司法法》，撤销指控的尝试是不合规的。

丹麦·拉曼辩称，根据《刑法》第 302 条提出的谋杀指控是恶意提出的，侵犯了宪法权利，但法院没有接受这一理由。

吉隆坡，9月30日讯——一名大学生今天未能成功撤销对他的谋杀指控。该指控与四个月前发生在吉隆坡大东方购物中心附近安邦路的一起车祸中一对夫妇的死亡有关。

高等法院法官拿督阿斯拉姆·扎因努丁在允许控方对丹麦·拉曼·卡马尔·库马雷桑于 8 月 5 日提出的申请提出初步反对意见后作出裁决。

法官表示：“经审查双方提交的材料，法庭准许检方的初步异议。因此，被告撤销谋杀指控的申请被驳回。”

今天的庭审有副检察官 Mohamad Fadhly Mohd Zamry 和代表 Danish Raman 的律师 Donald Selvam 出席。

检方提出初步反对意见，理由是申请人撤销指控的请求不合规，不符合 1964 年《法院司法法》的规定。

24 岁的丹麦·拉曼 (Danish Raman) 试图撤销指控，他辩称检方根据《刑法》第 302 条对他提起道路交通事故指控的决定是恶意的，也就是说，是出于恶意。

他进一步辩称，该决定不合理，违反了联邦宪法第5条和第8条。

5月15日，丹麦·拉曼在地方法庭被控于5月2日凌晨5点30分在安邦路谋杀了61岁的老人A·多拉辛甘和56岁的妻子A·梅纳加。当时，他们正从吉隆坡城中城方向前往安邦坊。

这对夫妇因头部受到严重伤害而死亡，他们当时乘坐的本田 Wave Alpha 摩托车被该男子驾驶的丰田 Vios 从后方撞击。

他被控违反《刑法》第302条，该条规定，一旦罪名成立，可判处死刑或30至40年有期徒刑，并处以至少12下鞭刑。——马新社

砂拉越飞行医生服务直升机坠毁：警方未发现人为因素迹象

比多尔加油站枪击案：男子肩部中弹入院

男子因擅闯与砂拉越副省长妻子有关的房屋被判入狱两周