Revoked excos fight back: Ten ask High Court to void Negeri Sembilan gazette被撤销行政议员资格的议员们奋起反击:十人请求高等法院撤销森美兰州政府公报
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 7 — Ten Negeri Sembilan state executive councillors (excos) have sued the state government in the High Court to challenge the revocation of their appointments,...

Ten Negeri Sembilan state executive councillors have filed a lawsuit in the High Court against the state government, challenging the validity of the revocation of their appointments, which was gazetted on September 24.
They contend that the revocation violates the state constitution, as it was enacted without the mandatory advice of the Menteri Besar.
The councillors seek declarations that the revocation is null and void, and demand compensation, while urging the public to refrain from speculation until a court resolution is achieved.
The case centers on whether such revocation powers can be executed solely at the Ruler's discretion.
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 7 — Ten Negeri Sembilan state executive councillors (excos) have sued the state government in the High Court to challenge the revocation of their appointments, their lawyers said today.
They want the court to declare that the revocation, gazetted on September 24, is invalid.
In a statement, law firm Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak said the 10 filed the lawsuit on October 5 by originating summons at the High Court in Seremban.
The defendants are the Negeri Sembilan government and the state secretary.
The lawyers said the 10 had filed 10 affidavits in support, while Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Ismail Lasim had also filed an additional affidavit.
“We ask that the public not make any speculation related to this originating summons until it is disposed by the court to prevent sub judice matters from arising,” the firm said.
Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, revoked the appointments after stating that the 10 had breached their oath of loyalty, according to the gazette.
The gazette said the revocation took effect on September 20 and was made under Article XXXVIII(5) of the Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan 1959, which says an exco member other than the Menteri Besar holds office for as long as the Ruler consents.
Ismail has said he was not consulted on the revocation, and that the constitution provides for such a revocation only on the Menteri Besar’s advice.
Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar has said the revocation is valid because exco members other than the Menteri Besar hold office at the Ruler’s pleasure.
The 10 are Datuk Mohd Faizal Ramli, Datuk Zaifulbahri Idris, Datuk Mustapha Nagoor, Siow Kong Choon, Siti Nur Umairah Hashim, Datuk Mohd Asna Amin, Datuk Mohd Razi Mohd Ali, Suhaimizan Bizar, Mohd Fairuz Mohd Isa and Datuk Razali Abu Samah.
In their statement, the lawyers described them as excos and did not use the term “former excos”.
In a court document seen by Malay Mail today, the 10 are seeking 12 court orders.
They include a declaration that the power to revoke an exco’s appointment must follow the requirements and procedures in the state constitution.
They also seek declarations that the Ruler cannot revoke an exco’s appointment on his own, or at his pleasure alone, without the menteri besar’s advice.
Because the constitution requires the menteri besar’s advice for such a revocation, they argue, the gazette revoking their appointments without it was “null, void and ineffective”.
They also want a direct declaration that the revocation, which was gazetted by the state secretary, is invalid.
The 10 further want the High Court to give directions for an expedited hearing.
They also want compensation in the form of general, exemplary and aggravated damages, with the amount to be decided by the court.
Recommended reading:
N. Sembilan Ruler formally revokes appointments of 10 exco members
Air quality deteriorates as 37 stations enter unhealthy bracket, Klang Valley and Johor hard hit
Seven suspects: Chinese national latest held as Pahang police close in on RM1.7m Genting jewellery heist
Some money in an account is linked to crime, can govt take all of it? Court of Appeal says no
森美兰州十名州行政议员向高等法院提起诉讼,挑战州政府撤销其任命的合法性,该撤销决定于9月24日公布。
他们认为,撤销该决定违反了州宪法,因为它是在没有州务大臣的强制建议的情况下颁布的。
议员们寻求法院宣布撤销无效,并要求赔偿,同时敦促公众在法院作出裁决之前不要妄加猜测。
本案的焦点在于,这种撤销权是否可以完全由统治者自行决定执行。
吉隆坡,10 月 7 日讯——森美兰州十名州行政议员(行政议员)的律师今天表示,他们已向高等法院提起诉讼,挑战州政府撤销其任命的决定。
他们希望法院宣布9月24日公布的撤销决定无效。
Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak 律师事务所在一份声明中表示,这 10 人于 10 月 5 日向芙蓉高等法院提起诉讼,并提交了起诉状。
被告是森美兰州政府和州秘书。
律师表示,这 10 人提交了 10 份宣誓书以示支持,而内政大臣拿督斯里伊斯迈·拉西姆也提交了一份补充宣誓书。
“我们要求公众不要就此起诉状进行任何猜测,直到法院对此案作出裁决,以防止出现未决案件,”该公司表示。
据宪报报道,森美兰国家元首端姑穆赫里兹端姑穆纳维尔表示,这 10 人违反了忠诚誓言,因此撤销了这些任命。
公告称,撤销令于9月20日生效,依据1959年森美兰州宪法第XXXVIII(5)条作出,该条规定,除州务大臣外的行政议员,只要统治者同意,其任期即可。
伊斯梅尔表示,他并未就撤销任命一事被咨询,而且宪法规定,只有在州务大臣的建议下才能撤销任命。
总检察长丹斯里莫哈末杜苏基莫克塔尔表示,撤销任命是有效的,因为除州务大臣以外的行政议员都是由统治者任命的。
这10人分别是拿督莫哈末法扎尔南利、拿督再富巴里伊德里斯、拿督穆斯塔法纳古尔、萧光春、西蒂努尔乌迈拉哈希姆、拿督莫哈末阿斯纳阿明、拿督莫哈末拉兹莫哈末阿里、苏海米赞比扎尔、莫哈末费尔鲁兹莫哈德伊萨和拿督拉扎里阿布萨马。
律师们在声明中称他们为执行委员会成员,而没有使用“前执行委员会成员”一词。
据《马来邮报》今天看到的一份法庭文件显示,这 10 人正在寻求 12 项法庭命令。
其中包括一项声明,即撤销执行委员会任命的权力必须遵循州宪法中的要求和程序。
他们还要求宣布,统治者不能在没有大臣的建议下,自行或单凭一己之力撤销行政委员会的任命。
他们认为,由于宪法规定撤销任命需要州务大臣的建议,因此,在没有州务大臣的建议下撤销他们任命的公报是“无效的”。
他们还希望得到一份直接声明,确认国务秘书在政府公报上公布的撤销决定无效。
这10人还希望高等法院指示加快审理此案。
他们还要求获得一般性赔偿、惩罚性赔偿和加重性赔偿,具体金额由法院决定。
推荐阅读:
森美兰州统治者正式撤销10名行政议员的任命
空气质量恶化,37个监测站空气质量指数进入不健康水平,巴生谷和柔佛州受影响最严重。
七名嫌疑人落网,最新一名中国籍嫌疑人被捕,彭亨州警方正全力侦破云顶珠宝170万令吉劫案。
账户中的部分资金与犯罪有关,政府能否全部没收?上诉法院裁定不行。