People’s Party bigwig calls on Pheu Thai to put the country first in the forthcoming no confidence vote

October 12, 2026 at 1:47 pm

in Media , Politics , Thailand

Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul faces a no-confidence showdown targeting 18 Bhumjaithai ministers amid promised bombshell corruption disclosures. However, the People’s Party is also challenging coalition partner Pheu Thai to choose between national interests and political power. Opposition deputy leader Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn claims Pheu Thai knows more about the Senate collusion scandal than his party. On Monday, Deputy Prime Minister Yotsanan Wongsawat declared there were no enemies in politics while pledging coalition loyalty. Meanwhile, Anutin dismissed fears of a split, expressing confidence in Pheu Thai and welcoming parliamentary scrutiny as a badge of honour.

Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul faces censure as People’s Party deputy leader Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn challenges Pheu Thai. Deputy Prime Minister Yotsanan Wongsawat pledges loyalty. ( Source: Khaosod )

Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul faces a fierce parliamentary showdown as the People’s Party prepares a no-confidence debate against 18 Bhumjaithai ministers. The opposition promises damaging revelations involving corruption, political interference and the manipulation of state institutions.

However, the confrontation has shifted attention towards coalition partner Pheu Thai. Senior opposition figures are challenging the former ruling party to choose between national interests and political power. On Monday, Deputy Prime Minister Yotsanan Wongsawat responded by declaring that nobody was an enemy in politics.

Meanwhile, Anutin dismissed concerns about his government’s survival. He expressed confidence in Pheu Thai and portrayed parliamentary scrutiny as a badge of honour.

Wiroj challenges Pheu Thai over Senate collusion as opposition targets 18 Bhumjaithai ministers in debate

The confrontation intensified over the weekend following a direct challenge from People’s Party deputy leader Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn. On Saturday, October 10, Wiroj questioned whether Pheu Thai would support Bhumjaithai when serious accusations reached Parliament.

In particular, he highlighted the controversial Senate collusion investigation. He claimed Pheu Thai possessed extensive information about suspected interference in the selection of senators. Indeed, Wiroj suggested the former ruling party might know more about the affair than the People’s Party itself.

His intervention followed the opposition’s submission of a no-confidence motion on Thursday, October 8. The motion carries 145 opposition MPs’ signatures and invokes Section 151 of the Constitution.

It targets 18 ministers individually, including Prime Minister Anutin. Crucially, every minister named belongs to Bhumjaithai. No Pheu Thai ministers face individual censure motions, despite the party’s participation in the coalition. Consequently, the selection has triggered questions about Pheu Thai’s position and the opposition’s political intentions.

The People’s Party denies protecting Pheu Thai or preparing a political arrangement with the former ruling party. Instead, its leaders insist ministers were selected according to evidence concerning their conduct in office.

Wiroj questions whether Bhumjaithai has left Pheu Thai ministers with little power in government

Nevertheless, Wiroj used the occasion to challenge Pheu Thai’s position within the coalition. He questioned whether the party could exercise its ministerial responsibilities independently. Furthermore, he asked whether Bhumjaithai had restricted Pheu Thai’s political influence so extensively that its ministers could achieve little.

Wiroj argued that the absence of Pheu Thai ministers did not necessarily indicate preferential treatment. Rather, he suggested their limited influence might explain why they had escaped serious opposition scrutiny.

He cited Deputy Prime Minister Yotsanan Wongsawat, Minister of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. According to Wiroj, the opposition had not received damaging information from civil servants concerning Yotsanan’s conduct. He suggested officials had not encountered misconduct serious enough to prompt them to approach opposition MPs.

However, Wiroj stressed that this did not mean Pheu Thai ministers were beyond criticism. Instead, he returned to the distribution of power inside Anutin’s government. He questioned whether Bhumjaithai controlled government mechanisms so extensively that Pheu Thai could exercise little meaningful influence.

The People’s Party deputy leader also acknowledged the difficulties facing coalition partners during parliamentary confrontations. He said politicians understood the conventions governing relationships between parties serving in the same government.

Senate collusion case puts Pheu Thai under pressure as Wiroj questions its coalition commitments

Moreover, Wiroj recognised that a brief debate might not provide sufficient time for coalition partners to reconsider their positions. He suggested parties might need additional time to assess evidence and public reaction.

In practice, withdrawals from coalition governments could occur after parliamentary debates rather than during them. Wiroj said the People’s Party understood Pheu Thai’s position in this respect. Nevertheless, his strongest challenge concerned the Senate collusion investigation and Pheu Thai’s previous involvement in the case.

Wiroj argued that Pheu Thai possessed considerable knowledge of suspected wrongdoing surrounding the Senate selection process. Notably, he pointed to the party’s earlier role in pursuing allegations concerning the selection of senators.

He suggested Pheu Thai politicians might possess more detailed information than their People’s Party counterparts. He also referred to the seriousness of the accusations, including organised crime and conspiracy. Furthermore, he argued that Pheu Thai had previously recognised the gravity of the Senate controversy.

The opposition politician questioned whether joining Bhumjaithai in government had changed the party’s willingness to pursue the matter. His remarks challenged Pheu Thai’s consistency on corruption and political interference.

Wiroj challenges Pheu Thai to choose between tackling corruption and retaining government power

Specifically, Wiroj asked whether Pheu Thai would continue pursuing wrongdoing after joining politicians it had previously challenged. He also questioned whether action against corruption should depend upon which party held government power. Previously, Pheu Thai had promised voters that it would address serious problems when given the opportunity to govern.

Wiroj argued that confronting corruption should not depend upon gaining or retaining ministerial office. He challenged Pheu Thai to explain whether its present coalition commitments had changed its approach.

In pointed remarks, he questioned whether political cooperation had replaced the party’s previous determination to pursue suspected wrongdoing. He asked whether Pheu Thai would now refuse to act against people it had previously accused. Ultimately, he challenged the party to decide whether national interests or political power would determine its parliamentary response.

The People’s Party deputy leader did not predict how Pheu Thai MPs would vote. Instead, he said the decision belonged to Pheu Thai itself. He also referred to speculation about another political party potentially entering government if the coalition changed. However, Wiroj presented no confirmed arrangement for a replacement coalition. His challenge remained directed at Pheu Thai’s response to the evidence expected during the debate.

Sutin says Pheu Thai will assess evidence as Yotsanan rejects the idea of permanent political enemies

Separately, senior Pheu Thai MP Sutin Klangsang addressed the controversy on Sunday, October 11. Sutin indicated that his party would consider the evidence before determining its position. He said ministers facing serious accusations would need to provide satisfactory explanations.

Otherwise, they could encounter difficulties retaining public confidence. However, Sutin questioned suggestions that the opposition had deliberately excluded Pheu Thai ministers to divide the government. He suggested the People’s Party might simply lack sufficient evidence against ministers from his party.

Accordingly, Sutin argued that the exclusion did not necessarily establish a wider political strategy. His comments came amid speculation about the future relationship between Pheu Thai and Bhumjaithai.

The controversy intensified again on Monday morning, October 12, when Deputy Prime Minister Yotsanan Wongsawat spoke at Government House. At approximately 9 am, Yotsanan answered reporters’ questions about the no-confidence motion and Pheu Thai’s position. He said the opposition had established the parliamentary process. Ministers must now await the debate’s contents.

At the same time, Pheu Thai remained responsible for several urgent government priorities. Yotsanan stressed that the party intended to concentrate on fulfilling its responsibilities. Its ministers would continue performing their assigned duties within Anutin’s government.

Reporters then questioned whether the opposition’s decision to exclude Pheu Thai ministers suggested a possible future alliance. In response, Yotsanan rejected the idea of permanent political enemies. He declared that politicians could cooperate despite belonging to different parties.

Yotsanan cites flood relief cooperation while reaffirming Pheu Thai support for Anutin’s coalition

His response avoided portraying the People’s Party as a permanent political adversary. Nevertheless, he offered no indication that Pheu Thai intended to abandon its coalition agreement.

Instead, Yotsanan referred to recent flood relief operations as an example of cooperation between political opponents. He said politicians from different backgrounds had worked together during the emergency. Likewise, he argued that parliamentary politics operated through established checks and balances. The opposition and government had different responsibilities, but both were expected to perform their duties.

Yotsanan also reaffirmed Pheu Thai’s responsibilities as a coalition partner. He stressed that the party would continue contributing to the government’s work. His remarks rejected permanent political hostility while confirming continued coalition cooperation.

Subsequently, reporters pressed him about Pheu Thai ministers’ involvement in the coming debate. They asked whether his colleagues would help explain matters raised against Bhumjaithai ministers. Although none faced individual motions, their ministries could become involved in questions concerning government decisions.

Pheu Thai ministers pledge to help answer questions as Anutin dismisses threats to coalition unity

Yotsanan confirmed that ministers would cooperate when parliamentary questions involved overlapping responsibilities. He said government members shared responsibility for their work. Therefore, ministers whose departments were connected to matters under scrutiny would help provide explanations.

He emphasised that all coalition partners had a common responsibility to assist. As a result, Pheu Thai ministers could participate in the government’s defence without facing individual censure motions. His comments confirmed that the party intended to remain involved in the parliamentary response.

On another front, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul displayed confidence as the opposition prepared its attack. Speaking to reporters on Monday, he dismissed suggestions that targeting Bhumjaithai alone would fracture the coalition. He pointed to the distribution of ministerial positions within his government.

Bhumjaithai held 27 of the Cabinet’s 35 ministerial positions, he said. Given that dominance, he considered it unsurprising that the opposition had concentrated its scrutiny on Bhumjaithai ministers. The prime minister also welcomed the exclusion of Pheu Thai ministers.

Anutin welcomes scrutiny as a chance to defend ministers and insists Pheu Thai will remain loyal

Anutin said their absence from the motion allowed them to continue working without facing individual parliamentary accusations. Reporters questioned whether he remained confident that Pheu Thai would support Bhumjaithai throughout the debate. He replied that he was confident.

Additionally, Anutin rejected suggestions that the opposition’s tactics had created an immediate threat to government unity. His response followed earlier comments portraying the parliamentary confrontation as an opportunity for ministers.

Rather than treating the debate as a political humiliation, Anutin suggested that ministers should welcome the scrutiny. He argued that parliamentary questioning allowed government members to explain their performance directly to MPs and the public.

Moreover, ministers could present their achievements, answer accusations and clarify decisions made during their time in office. Anutin suggested that being selected for opposition scrutiny was a distinction rather than a setback. On Saturday, he even joked that Bhumjaithai ministers wanted to face parliamentary questioning.

The prime minister teased Deputy Interior Minister Polpee Suwanchawee for escaping inclusion on the opposition’s list. His remarks contrasted with the opposition’s warnings about the evidence it intended to present.

Even so, Anutin acknowledged that ministers needed to prepare thoroughly. He accepted that legitimate criticism should receive serious consideration. The prime minister’s confidence comes as parliamentary arrangements remain unsettled.

Opposition seeks five days for censure debate as ministers prepare to answer corruption accusations

The opposition submitted its motion on October 8, but no final dates have been announced. House Speaker Sophon Zaram must first complete the procedural examination of the submission. The debate is expected in late October, although proceedings could extend into early November.

Meanwhile, the opposition and government disagree over the time required for questioning. The People’s Party wants five days to examine the conduct of the 18 ministers. Government representatives have proposed three days.

Consequently, the parliamentary timetable remains another point of disagreement before proceedings begin. The dispute concerns numerous individual ministers and a wide range of accusations. The opposition intends to examine claims involving corruption, political influence and interference with state institutions.

In addition, People’s Party figures have promised significant disclosures when the debate reaches Parliament. However, the detailed evidence has not yet been presented during parliamentary proceedings.

The accusations will require examination when the named ministers respond. The People’s Party must establish its case against each minister targeted by the motion. Meanwhile, government members will have the opportunity to challenge the accusations and present their explanations.

The eventual confidence votes will determine whether the targeted ministers retain parliamentary support. Separately, People’s Party deputy leader Parit Wacharasindhu addressed speculation about the exclusion of Pheu Thai ministers on Monday.

Parit denies secret deal with Pheu Thai as Senate collusion questions sharpen the coalition dispute

Parit insisted that the opposition had selected its targets according to available evidence. He rejected suggestions of a secret political understanding between the People’s Party and Pheu Thai. Furthermore, he denied claims that the opposition was preparing a future alliance with the coalition partner.

His comments followed speculation that targeting Bhumjaithai alone might be intended to isolate Anutin politically. However, Parit maintained that the decision concerned individual ministers’ conduct rather than party affiliations.

The People’s Party’s stated position remains that those facing serious accusations must answer them in Parliament. Nevertheless, the exclusion of Pheu Thai ministers has become a major political issue before the debate itself.

Pheu Thai previously led the government and now serves under Anutin’s leadership. Its ministers have escaped individual scrutiny in the present motion. However, its MPs will still participate in deciding whether the targeted Bhumjaithai ministers retain parliamentary confidence.

That decision places the former ruling party directly within the coming confrontation. Wiroj’s remarks have sharpened attention on its previous involvement in the Senate collusion controversy. He argues that Pheu Thai possesses substantial information concerning the suspected interference.

Moreover, he has challenged the party to explain whether coalition membership affects its willingness to pursue the matter. His questions concern the relationship between Pheu Thai’s previous position and its present government responsibilities.

Yotsanan pledges coalition support while Anutin awaits a debate targeting 18 Bhumjaithai ministers

Yotsanan’s response on Monday emphasised a different aspect of the political dispute. He reaffirmed the party’s coalition commitments while rejecting the idea of permanent political enemies.

Furthermore, he confirmed that Pheu Thai ministers would assist in answering relevant parliamentary questions. Anutin, meanwhile, insisted that his government remained united. He expressed confidence in Pheu Thai and said Bhumjaithai ministers were ready to defend their records.

The prime minister also maintained that parliamentary scrutiny provided an opportunity to explain the government’s achievements. However, the opposition continues preparing accusations against 18 ministers from his party.

The People’s Party wants five days to present its case, while government representatives favour three. In addition, the Speaker must complete the procedural examination before the debate can be scheduled. For now, no final parliamentary dates have been announced.

The confrontation is expected later this month, with proceedings potentially continuing into November. Meanwhile, Pheu Thai remains inside the government, despite opposition challenges over its political independence. Its ministers continue working, and Yotsanan has confirmed their willingness to assist during the debate.

The People’s Party has denied any secret arrangement with the former ruling party. Nevertheless, its senior figures continue pressing Pheu Thai over the Senate investigation and its previous commitments.

The decisive parliamentary proceedings have yet to begin. The opposition must present its evidence, while the targeted ministers will have the opportunity to answer. MPs must then decide whether to retain confidence in each minister. Until then, Anutin remains confident of coalition support, while Pheu Thai maintains its place in government.

PM says he can explain. Denies power over impartial agencies as a no confidence motion is filed in House

Licenced online gambling site abroad linked to the husband of a government MP raises legal quandary

House Committee chair Rome to call Bhumjaithai MP and Australian husband on Wednesday over wealth

Bhumjaithai MP files police report against People’s Party’s Rangsiman Rome over scammer link remarks

Rangsiman Rome defamation case deferred until May 2027. Criticism of scam case prosecutions by police

Former cabinet minister and Pheu Thai highflyer clarifies Ben Smith and luxury Gulfstream jet story

PM Paetongtarn suspended from duties while Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Jungrungruangkit takes power

Teng warns People’s Party to stay clear of rising anti-democratic sentiment as political crisis unfolds

Opinion shows Prime Minister Paetongtarn finished with the public. Huge support for the People’s Party

Bangkok protest passes off with no overnight camp. Meanwhile, the PM prepares for July 1st court date

Joseph Anthony is an expat from Ireland who has lived in Thailand for the last decade. He has worked extensively in the media including editorial positions in Ireland and Thailand. He is focused on economic and business stories in Thailand as well as the expat lifestyle.

All posts by Joseph O' Connor

Eleven arrested in Saturday property raids linked to foreigners with links to criminality across Bangkok October 10, 2026 Police raid Bangkok’s luxury estates, targeting

Burmese drug kingpin with multiple identities and lives linked to massive cash seizure in Chiang Rai October 10, 2026 Dead in 2022. Arrested in South Korea in 2026. Noo

Thailand reels at story of mother taken against her will to a prison like nursing home with caged beds for inmates October 9, 2026 Police probe a family nightmare as Mother Phat, 63,

51 year old Frenchman arrested in Chiang Mai for running a tourist hostel through a nominee company October 9, 2026 Frenchman arrested after police raid a Chiang Mai

Queen is first Thai woman to fly a Swedish Gripen fighter jet. King in Surat Thani to congratulate her October 9, 2026 From Boeing jets to a supersonic fighter: Queen

Justice Minister and other cabinet members lead raids on Jewish centres in Bangkok as financial case grows October 8, 2026 A tiny Bangkok office registered to six entities, 61

Licenced online gambling site abroad linked to the husband of a government MP raises legal quandary October 8, 2026 A ฿1.9bn wealth controversy threatens to engulf

Horror care centre closed in Kanchanaburi where patients were locked into caged beds and prison cells October 7, 2026 Steel cage beds, barred rooms and psychiatric patients

New tourist tax of 450 baht a step closer with officials targeting early 2027 after cabinet approval is obtained October 7, 2026 Foreign tourists face a ฿450 Thai entry charge from

Corruption and crime crusader carted off to Bangkok Remand Prison after court refused last minute bail October 5, 2026 Atchariya is behind bars after losing bail as cyber

Vietnam’s economic growth races ahead of Thailand’s putting it on track to overtake its net GDP by 2029 October 5, 2026 Thailand’s economic lead is under pressure as

America reached out to Thais in Korat last weekend with a county fair show hosted by Ambassador O’ Neill October 5, 2026 Freedom, jazz and enterprise take centre stage in

Two Germans killed on Khao Lak died on a road that had already claimed foreign lives and seen carnage October 4, 2026 German couple killed at a Khao Lak crossing join a

Harrowing moments for husband in Chonburi who saw his wife killed by an angry elephant early Sunday October 4, 2026 Wild elephant pursues and kills Wanna Sridachama, 36,

Drunk driver mowed down a Thai woman and her German friend in Saturday’s early hours. Both died October 4, 2026 Double tragedy on Bangkok’s Thong Lor Road as Thai

Top anti corruption crusader arrested and charged by police in online gambling probe linked to boxing October 3, 2026 Thailand’s top crime fighter Atchariya is jailed

US raises the stakes on industrial capacity and transshipments posing trade barriers to Thai exports October 3, 2026 Bangkok’s US trade bargain faces a tariff

Counterfeiting racket selling on TikTok and Lazada busted in Samut Sakhon. Six foreigners arrested on site October 10, 2026

PM says he can explain. Denies power over impartial agencies as a no confidence motion is filed in House October 10, 2026

Murder in Trang over meth tablet dealing. Two men arrested after burned remains found near reservoir October 9, 2026

Commerce Minister says that a November signing of a US Thai trade deal is in sight as exporters stand by October 9, 2026

Armed police action in Nonthaburi as man wanted for attempted murder sought to evade an arrest warrant October 9, 2026

Thailand struggles economically even with revised World Bank GDP growth for 2026 coming in at 2% for 2026 October 8, 2026

New taxes simply for going in and out of Thailand in addition to higher airport tax already implemented October 8, 2026

Thaksin comes to Tax Court in Bangkok seeking temporary injunction to halt Revenue Department’s enforcement October 7, 2026

Senators from the ‘blue’ camp move against dissident Election Commissioner Sitthichot Intrawises October 6, 2026

Thai Airways defeats flood crisis but finds itself in a brewing crisis of confidence over its management October 5, 2026

Grab delivery driver strikes rich in Phuket by using trade to burgle 2 homes netting 3.69 million baht October 5, 2026

USS George HW Bush arrives in Phuket one day early and berths 3.3km offshore. Sailors landing ashore in holiday mode October 5, 2026

Police investigate a Burmese kingpin who entered Thailand by plane from India and had access to wealth October 4, 2026

Thai industrial base hammered by flooding crisis. Over 4k firms report a need for financial assistance October 4, 2026

House Committee chair Rome to call Bhumjaithai MP and Australian husband on Wednesday over wealth October 4, 2026

Two German tourists killed at Phang-nga zebra crossing. Pickup driver tore into them on Friday night October 3, 2026

Storm clouds gathering again as Thailand races to bolster its flood defences after last week’s deluge October 3, 2026

Bhumjaithai MP files police report against People’s Party’s Rangsiman Rome over scammer link remarks October 2, 2026

Thai Airways boss fired by the board chaired by Finance Ministry chief on Friday over baggage crisis October 2, 2026

Elderly woman seriously injured after an old man drove EV car at speed into a crowded Bangkok shrine October 2, 2026

Tuk Tuk driver in Phuket assaulted by Middle Eastern looking tourist who failed to pay his fare to a hotel October 2, 2026

Naturalised citizenship scrutinised as PM scraps Israeli’s Thai status over ongoing home passport use October 1, 2026

© 2026 Thai Examiner. All rights reserved.

2026年10月12日下午1点47分

在媒体、政治、泰国

在承诺披露重磅腐败丑闻之际，泰自豪党总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔面临针对18名泰自豪党部长的不信任投票。然而，人民党也向其执政联盟伙伴为泰党发出挑战，要求其在国家利益和政治权力之间做出选择。反对党副领袖维罗·拉卡纳迪颂声称，为泰党比他的政党更了解参议院的勾结丑闻。周一，副总理约萨南·翁沙瓦宣称政坛没有敌人，并承诺效忠执政联盟。与此同时，阿努廷驳斥了分裂的担忧，表示对为泰党充满信心，并将议会的审查视为一种荣誉。

泰国总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔面临谴责，人民党副主席维罗·拉卡纳迪颂挑战为泰党。副总理约萨南·翁沙瓦宣誓效忠。（来源：考索德报）

总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔面临激烈的议会对决，人民党准备对18名泰自豪党部长发起不信任投票。反对党承诺将揭露涉及腐败、政治干预和操纵国家机构的种种丑闻。

然而，这场对抗已将焦点转移到执政联盟伙伴为泰党身上。反对派高层人士正敦促这个前执政党在国家利益和政治权力之间做出选择。周一，副总理尤萨南·翁沙瓦回应称，在政治中没有人是敌人。

与此同时，阿努廷驳斥了外界对其政府存亡的担忧。他表示对为泰党充满信心，并将议会的监督视为一种荣誉。

维罗就参议院勾结事件质问为泰党，反对党在辩论中将矛头指向18名泰自豪党部长。

周末期间，随着人民党副党魁维罗·拉卡纳迪颂的直接挑战，双方对抗进一步升级。10月10日星期六，维罗质疑为泰党是否会在针对泰自豪党的严重指控提交国会后继续支持该党。

他特别强调了备受争议的参议院串谋调查。他声称，为泰党掌握了大量关于涉嫌干预参议员选举的信息。事实上，维罗伊暗示，这个前执政党可能比人民党更了解此事。

他的介入是在反对党于 10 月 8 日星期四提交不信任动议之后进行的。该动议有 145 名反对党议员签名，并援引了宪法第 151 条。

此次动议针对18名部长，其中包括总理阿努廷。关键在于，所有被点名的部长都来自泰自豪党。尽管为泰党也参与了执政联盟，但没有一位为泰党部长面临个人谴责。因此，此次动议引发了人们对为泰党立场以及反对派政治意图的质疑。

人民党否认包庇为泰党或与前执政党达成政治协议。相反，该党领导人坚称，部长人选是根据其在任期间的行为证据选出的。

维罗吉质疑泰自豪党是否已削弱了为泰党部长在政府中的权力。

然而，维罗吉借此机会质疑为泰党在执政联盟中的地位。他质疑该党能否独立履行其部长职责。此外，他还质问泰自豪党是否对为泰党的政治影响力进行了过度限制，以至于其部长们几乎无所作为。

维罗伊认为，为泰党部长缺席并不一定意味着他们受到了特殊待遇。相反，他认为，他们影响力有限或许可以解释为什么他们没有受到反对派的严格审查。

他提到了副总理兼高等教育、科学、研究与创新部长约萨南·翁沙瓦。据维罗伊称，反对党并未从公务员处收到任何关于约萨南行为不当的不利信息。他暗示，官员们并未遇到严重到需要他们联系反对党议员的不当行为。

然而，维罗伊强调，这并不意味着为泰党部长们就不能受到批评。相反，他再次将矛头指向阿努廷政府内部的权力分配。他质疑泰自豪党是否对政府机制拥有如此广泛的控制权，以至于为泰党几乎无法发挥任何实质性的影响力。

人民党副主席也承认，执政联盟伙伴在议会对抗中面临着诸多困难。他表示，政治家们都理解同一政府中各政党之间关系的惯例。

参议院串谋案令为泰党面临压力，维罗伊质疑其对执政联盟的承诺

此外，维罗伊也意识到，短暂的辩论可能不足以让联盟伙伴重新考虑各自的立场。他建议各方可能需要更多时间来评估证据和公众反应。

实际上，退出联合政府可能发生在议会辩论之后，而不是辩论期间。维罗伊表示，人民党理解为泰党在这方面的立场。然而，他最大的质疑在于参议院的串谋调查以及为泰党此前在该案中的牵连。

维罗伊认为，为泰党对参议院选举过程中涉嫌的不当行为掌握了相当多的信息。他特别指出，该党此前曾参与调查有关参议员遴选的指控。

他暗示，为泰党政客可能掌握比人民党政客更详细的信息。他还提到指控的严重性，包括有组织犯罪和阴谋论。此外，他辩称，为泰党此前已经意识到参议院争议的严重性。

这位反对派政治人物质疑，加入泰自豪党执政是否改变了该党处理此事的意愿。他的言论质疑了为泰党在反腐败和政治干预问题上的立场一致性。

维罗伊向为泰党发出挑战，要求其在打击腐败和保住政府权力之间做出选择。

具体来说，维罗伊质问为泰党在与此前曾挑战过的政客结盟后，是否会继续追究不法行为。他还质疑，反腐行动是否应取决于哪个政党执政。此前，为泰党曾向选民承诺，一旦有机会执政，将着手解决各种严重问题。

维罗伊认为，打击腐败不应取决于能否获得或保住部长职位。他质问为泰党，其目前的执政联盟承诺是否改变了其反腐策略。

他措辞尖锐地质疑，政治合作是否已经取代了该党此前追究涉嫌不当行为的决心。他质问为泰党是否会拒绝对其先前指控的人采取行动。最后，他挑战该党，要求其在议会中的回应究竟应以国家利益还是政治权力为导向。

人民党副党魁并未预测为泰党议员的投票意向。他表示，最终决定权在于为泰党自身。他还提及了有关如果执政联盟发生变化，其他政党可能加入执政的猜测。然而，维罗并未提出任何关于替代执政联盟的确切安排。他仍然关注为泰党在辩论中对预期证据的回应。

苏廷表示，为泰党将评估证据，而育山南则否认存在永久政治敌人。

此外，为泰党资深国会议员素廷·克朗桑于10月11日星期日就此事发表了讲话。素廷表示，为泰党将在确定立场前考虑相关证据。他指出，面临严重指控的部长需要做出令人满意的解释。

否则，他们可能难以维持公众信任。然而，苏廷质疑反对党故意排除为泰党部长以分裂政府的说法。他认为，人民党可能只是缺乏针对其党内部长的足够证据。

因此，苏廷认为，这种排斥并不一定意味着存在更广泛的政治策略。他的这番言论正值外界猜测为泰党和泰自豪党未来关系之际。

10月12日星期一上午，副总理尤萨南·翁沙瓦在总理府发表讲话，争议再次升级。大约上午9点，尤萨南回答了记者关于不信任动议和为泰党立场的问题。他表示，反对党已经确立了议会程序。部长们现在必须等待辩论结果。

与此同时，为泰党仍负责多项政府要务。约特萨南强调，该党将集中精力履行其职责。其部长们将继续在阿努廷政府中履行各自的职责。

记者随后质疑反对党将为泰党部长排除在外是否暗示着未来可能结盟。对此，育山南否认存在永久的政治敌人。他表示，即使分属不同政党，政治人物也可以合作。

约萨南在重申为泰党支持阿努廷领导的联盟的同时，也提到了洪灾救援方面的合作。

他的回应避免将人民党描绘成永久的政治对手。然而，他也没有暗示为泰党打算放弃联合执政协议。

相反，约特萨南以近期洪灾救援行动为例，说明政治对手之间如何合作。他表示，来自不同背景的政治人物在紧急情况下携手合作。同样，他认为议会政治运作依赖于既定的权力制衡机制。反对党和执政党职责不同，但双方都应履行各自的职责。

约萨南重申了为泰党作为执政联盟伙伴的责任。他强调，该党将继续为政府工作做出贡献。他的讲话驳斥了持续的政治敌对，并确认了执政联盟将继续合作。

随后，记者们就为泰党部长们是否会参与即将举行的辩论向他施压。他们询问他的同事们是否会协助解释针对泰自豪党部长们提出的指控。尽管这些部长们没有面临个人动议，但他们的部门可能会卷入有关政府决策的问题中。

为泰党部长承诺协助解答疑问，阿努廷驳斥了对执政联盟团结的威胁。

约特萨南确认，当议会质询涉及职责重叠时，各部长将予以合作。他表示，政府成员对其工作负有共同责任。因此，与受审查事项相关的部门部长将协助提供解释。

他强调，所有执政联盟伙伴都有共同的协助责任。因此，为泰党部长们可以参与政府的辩护，而无需面临个人的谴责动议。他的讲话证实，该党打算继续参与议会的应对工作。

另一方面，随着反对党准备发起攻击，总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔展现出信心。周一，他在接受记者采访时驳斥了仅针对泰自豪党就会导致执政联盟分裂的说法。他指出，政府内部的部长职位分配情况良好。

他表示，泰自豪党占据了内阁35个部长职位中的27个。鉴于其如此强大的影响力，反对党将审查重点放在泰自豪党部长身上也就不足为奇了。总理还对为泰党部长被排除在外表示欢迎。

阿努廷欢迎审查，认为这是为部长们辩护的机会，并坚称为泰党将保持忠诚。

阿努廷表示，他们缺席此次动议使他们能够继续工作，而无需面临议会的个人指责。记者询问他是否仍然相信为泰党会在整个辩论过程中支持泰自豪党。他回答说，他有信心。

此外，阿努廷驳斥了反对派的策略已对政府团结构成直接威胁的说法。此前，他曾表示，议会中的对抗对部长们来说是一个机会。

阿努廷认为，部长们不应将这场辩论视为政治羞辱，而应欢迎这种审查。他指出，议会质询使政府成员能够直接向议员和公众解释他们的工作表现。

此外，部长们还可以展示政绩、回应指责并澄清任期内做出的决定。阿努廷认为，被选为反对党审查对象是一种荣誉而非挫折。周六，他甚至开玩笑说，泰自豪党部长们渴望接受议会质询。

总理嘲讽内政部副部长波尔佩·苏万查维未能被列入反对党名单。他的言论与反对党此前关于将要提交的证据的警告形成鲜明对比。

尽管如此，阿努廷也承认，部长们需要做好充分的准备。他表示，合理的批评应该得到认真对待。总理的信心是在议会安排仍不明朗的情况下展现出来的。

反对党要求对部长们进行五天的谴责辩论，部长们准备回应腐败指控。

反对党于10月8日提交了动议，但尚未公布最终日期。众议院议长索蓬·扎拉姆必须首先完成对该动议的程序审查。辩论预计将于10月下旬举行，但程序可能会持续到11月初。

与此同时，反对党和政府在质询所需时间上存在分歧。人民党希望用五天时间调查18位部长的行为，而政府代表则提议用三天。

因此，议会日程安排仍是开庭前的另一个争议点。这场争议涉及多位部长和一系列指控。反对党打算调查涉及腐败、政治干预和干涉国家机构的指控。

此外，人民党人士承诺，一旦辩论进入议会阶段，将公布大量重要信息。然而，详细证据尚未在议会程序中提交。

待被点名的部长作出回应后，这些指控将需要进行审查。人民党必须拿出证据，证明其对每位被指控部长的指控属实。与此同时，政府成员将有机会对这些指控提出异议并作出解释。

最终的信任投票将决定这些被针对的部长是否能继续获得议会支持。此外，人民党副主席帕里特·瓦查拉辛杜周一就有关为泰党部长被排除在外的猜测发表了讲话。

帕里特否认与为泰党达成秘密协议，参议院的勾结质疑加剧了联盟内部的纷争。

帕里特坚称，反对派是根据现有证据选择攻击目标的。他否认了人民党和为泰党之间存在秘密政治协议的说法。此外，他还否认了反对派正准备与执政联盟伙伴结成未来联盟的说法。

此前有猜测认为，单独针对泰自豪党可能意在孤立阿努廷的政治地位。然而，帕里特坚称，该决定针对的是个别部长的个人行为，而非党派归属。

人民党的既定立场依然是，面临严重指控的人必须在议会中作出答复。然而，在辩论开始之前，将为泰党部长排除在外已成为一个重要的政治问题。

为泰党曾执政，目前在阿努廷的领导下执政。该党部长们在此次动议中未受到个人审查。然而，为泰党议员仍将参与决定泰自豪党相关部长是否继续获得议会信任。

这一决定使前执政党直接卷入即将到来的对抗之中。维罗伊的言论使人们更加关注该党此前卷入参议院勾结丑闻一事。他认为，为泰党掌握着有关涉嫌干预的大量信息。

此外，他还要求该党解释加入执政联盟是否会影响其推进此事的意愿。他的问题涉及为泰党此前的立场与其当前执政职责之间的关系。

约萨南承诺支持联盟，而阿努廷则等待针对18名泰自豪党部长的辩论。

约特萨南周一的回应强调了政治争端的另一个方面。他重申了该党对联盟的承诺，同时驳斥了存在永久政治敌人的说法。

此外，他还确认为泰党部长将协助回答议会的相关质询。与此同时，阿努廷坚称其政府保持团结。他对为泰党充满信心，并表示泰自豪党部长已准备好捍卫其政绩。

总理还坚称，议会的监督机制为政府提供了一个解释其政绩的机会。然而，反对党仍在准备对其所在政党的18名部长提出指控。

人民党希望用五天时间陈述其观点，而政府代表则倾向于三天。此外，议长必须完成程序审查后，才能安排辩论。目前，议会尚未公布最终的会议日期。

预计本月晚些时候将举行对抗，相关程序可能持续到11月。与此同时，尽管反对派对其政治独立性提出质疑，为泰党仍留在政府中。该党部长们继续工作，育山南已确认他们愿意在辩论期间提供协助。

人民党否认与前执政党有任何秘密协议。尽管如此，该党高层人士仍继续就参议院调查及其此前的承诺向为泰党施压。

决定性的议会程序尚未开始。反对党必须提交证据，而受调查的部长们将有机会作出回应。之后，议员们必须决定是否继续信任每位部长。在此之前，阿努廷仍然对联盟的支持充满信心，而为泰党也继续保有其在政府中的地位。

总理表示他可以解释。在众议院提出不信任动议之际，他否认对公正机构拥有权力。

与政府议员丈夫有关联的海外持牌在线赌博网站引发法律难题

众议院委员会主席罗姆将于周三致电泰国议员布姆贾伊泰及其澳大利亚籍丈夫，讨论财富问题。

泰自豪党议员就人民党议员兰西曼·罗姆的诈骗链接言论向警方报案

兰西曼·罗姆诽谤案延期至2027年5月审理。警方对诈骗案的起诉受到批评。

前内阁部长兼为泰党高层澄清本·史密斯与豪华湾流喷气式飞机的故事

总理帕通坦被停职，副总理苏里亚·荣伦伦吉接任总理一职。

邓小平警告人民党要远离日益高涨的反民主情绪，因为政治危机正在不断演变。

民意调查显示，总理佩通坦已失去民心。人民党获得巨大支持。

曼谷抗议活动结束，没有出现过夜露营的情况。与此同时，总理正准备参加7月1日的庭审。

约瑟夫·安东尼是一位来自爱尔兰的侨民，过去十年一直居住在泰国。他曾在爱尔兰和泰国的媒体行业担任过编辑职务，拥有丰富的媒体从业经验。他主要关注泰国的经济和商业新闻，以及侨民的生活方式。

约瑟夫·奥康纳的所有帖子

2026年10月10日，曼谷警方周六突击搜查多处房产，逮捕11名与涉嫌犯罪活动有关联的外国人。警方突击搜查了曼谷的豪华住宅区，目标是……

缅甸毒枭，拥有多个身份和多条人命，与2026年10月10日清莱发生的巨额现金查获案有关。2022年死亡。2026年在韩国被捕。Noo

泰国震惊于一名母亲被强行送往如同监狱般的养老院，院内床位如同笼子一般，病人被关在笼子里。2026年10月9日，警方调查这起家庭噩梦：63岁的帕特母亲被强行送往养老院，院内床位如同笼子。

2026年10月9日，一名51岁的法国男子在清迈因通过代理公司经营旅游旅馆被捕。警方突袭清迈一家旅馆后，该法国男子被捕。

泰国王后成为首位驾驶瑞典鹰狮战斗机的泰国女性。国王于2026年10月9日前往素叻他尼府祝贺她。从波音喷气式飞机到超音速战斗机：王后

2026年10月8日，司法部长和其他内阁成员突击搜查曼谷的犹太中心，财务案件不断扩大。一家位于曼谷的小型办公室注册在六个实体名下，涉案金额达61美元。

一家与政府议员丈夫有关联的海外持牌在线赌博网站引发法律难题 2026年10月8日 一场19亿泰铢的财富纠纷或将席卷整个行业

2026年10月7日，北碧府一家恐怖的护理中心被关闭，该中心曾将病人锁在笼状床铺和牢房中。照片显示，该中心内有钢笼床、铁栅栏房间和精神病患者。

泰铢450泰铢的新旅游税计划在获得内阁批准后，于2027年初正式实施，距离实施又近了一步。2026年10月7日，外国游客将面临450泰铢的入境费。

反腐败和打击犯罪斗士阿查里亚（Atchariya）因网络犯罪被法院拒绝保释，于2026年10月5日被送往曼谷拘留监狱。

越南经济增长速度超过泰国，有望在2029年净GDP超过泰国（2026年10月5日）。泰国的经济领先地位正面临压力。

上周末，美国在呵叻府举办了一场由美国驻泰国大使奥尼尔主持的乡村集市演出，以此拉近了与泰国民众的距离。2026年10月5日，自由、爵士乐和创业精神成为焦点。

2026年10月4日，两名德国人在考拉遇难，他们死于一条此前已夺走多条外国人生命并造成惨重伤亡的道路上。这对德国夫妇在考拉的一个过境点被撞身亡。

2026年10月4日星期日清晨，春武里府一名丈夫亲眼目睹妻子被愤怒的大象咬死，经历了令人痛心的时刻。野生大象追逐并杀死了36岁的Wanna Sridachama。

周六凌晨，一名醉酒司机驾车撞倒了一名泰国女子和她的德国朋友。两人于2026年10月4日在曼谷通罗路不幸身亡。

泰国顶级反腐斗士因涉嫌参与与拳击相关的网络赌博案被警方逮捕并起诉 2026年10月3日 泰国顶级反腐斗士阿查里亚被判入狱

美国提高工业产能和转运方面的门槛，对泰国出口设置贸易壁垒 2026年10月3日 曼谷与美国达成的贸易协议面临关税威胁

沙没沙空府警方捣毁了一个在TikTok和Lazada上销售假冒商品的团伙。2026年10月10日，六名外国人在现场被捕。

首相表示他可以解释。他否认对公正机构拥有权力，此前众议院于2026年10月10日提交了不信任动议。

董里府因冰毒片剂交易发生谋杀案。2026年10月9日，两名男子在水库附近发现被焚烧的尸体后被捕。

商务部长表示，美泰贸易协议有望在11月签署，出口商已做好准备。（2026年10月9日）

2026年10月9日，暖武里府警方对一名因涉嫌谋杀未遂而被通缉的男子采取武装行动，该男子试图逃避逮捕令。

即使世界银行将泰国2026年的GDP增长率修正为2%，泰国经济依然举步维艰。（2026年10月8日）

除了已经实施的更高机场税之外，泰国还将对进出境征收新的税费，该税项已于2026年10月8日生效。

他信于2026年10月7日向曼谷税务法庭申请临时禁令，以阻止税务部门的执法行动。

来自“蓝营”的参议员们对持不同政见的选举专员西提乔特·因特拉怀斯采取行动 2026年10月6日

泰国航空克服了洪灾危机，但却发现自己正面临着管理层信任危机（2026年10月5日）

2026年10月5日，一名Grab外卖员在普吉岛利用行窃机会入室盗窃两户人家，共盗走369万泰铢。

“乔治·H·W·布什”号航空母舰提前一天抵达普吉岛，停泊在离岸3.3公里处。水兵们于2026年10月5日以度假模式上岸。

警方正在调查一名缅甸黑帮头目，他于2026年10月4日从印度乘飞机进入泰国，并拥有雄厚的财力。

泰国工业基础遭受洪灾重创。超过4000家企业表示需要财政援助。（2026年10月4日）

众议院委员会主席罗姆将于2026年10月4日星期三致电泰国议员布姆贾伊泰及其澳大利亚籍丈夫，讨论财富问题。

两名德国游客在攀牙府斑马线被撞身亡。2026年10月3日星期五晚，一辆皮卡车撞向他们。

上周泰国遭遇洪灾后，暴雨云团再次聚集，泰国正加紧加强防洪措施。（2026年10月3日）

泰自豪党议员就人民党议员兰西曼·罗姆涉嫌诈骗言论向警方报案 2026年10月2日

泰国航空公司首席执行官因行李危机于2026年10月2日（星期五）被财政部长主持的董事会解雇。

2026年10月2日，一名老人驾驶电动汽车高速冲入曼谷一座拥挤的寺庙，导致一名老妇重伤。

2026年10月2日，普吉岛一名嘟嘟车司机因未支付前往酒店的车费而被一名看起来像中东人的游客殴打。

2026年10月1日，总理因以色列人持续使用本国护照而取消其泰国公民身份，入籍公民身份受到审查。

© 2026 Thai Examiner。版权所有。