Negeri Sembilan Dewan rules Sept 5 document treasonous, confirms Tuanku Muhriz remains Yang di‑Pertuan Besar

The Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) has deemed the actions of six individuals, who attempted to depose Tuanku Muhriz as Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, as treasonous under adat and law.

It found that four of the signatories did not hold legitimate positions and issued unlawful directives, leading to the rejection of their actions and a police report against them.

The DKU emphasized the continued recognition of Tuanku Muhriz and clarified Undang positions, while expressing concerns over a proposed reconciliation committee that may infringe on its jurisdiction.

It reaffirmed that Tuanku Muhriz remains the lawful Yang di-Pertuan Besar, with no current vacancies in the office.

SEREMBAN, Sept 14 — The Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) has declared that six individuals who signed a document dated September 5 seeking to depose the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan acted in a manner considered treasonous under adat and law.

The Dewan said four of the signatories did not hold the positions they claimed, had issued unlawful directives to government officers, and attempted to remove Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir without the mandatory investigation required under the state constitution.

It ruled that no government officer should act on instructions based on the September 5 document, and directed the state administration to continue recognising Tuanku Muhriz as the Yang di-Pertuan Besar. The Dewan also instructed its secretary to lodge a police report against the six individuals, noting that four of them had signed the September 5, 2026 document without holding the offices they purported to represent.

The Dewan further expressed concern over a proposal to form a reconciliation committee under the state government, saying matters of adat fall solely under its jurisdiction as provided for in Article XVI of the Negeri Sembilan Constitution. It said it would seek clarification from the government on the committee’s terms of reference.

In its statement, the Dewan reaffirmed its July 31 decision that the proclamation dated April 19 was unconstitutional, as three of the four signatories were not recognised Undang at the time. It stressed that no investigation had ever been carried out, as required under Article X(1), and that Tuanku Muhriz had never been given notice or the opportunity to be heard.

The Dewan noted that the then menteri besar had refused to endorse the proclamation on April 20, rendering it void. It added that a subsequent attempt by a new menteri besar to sign the same proclamation did not revive it, as the function under Article X(2) had already been discharged.

It said announcements made on September 5 and September 8 had no effect, as they relied entirely on the flawed April 19 proclamation and a subsequent instrument dated August 3, which did not add legitimacy.

The Dewan emphasised that Tuanku Muhriz remains the lawful Yang di-Pertuan Besar and president of the Dewan, and that no vacancy exists. It also clarified the current holders of Undang positions: Datuk Klana Petra Muhammad Faris Johari (Sungei Ujong), Datuk Sedia Raja Haji Hassan Ab Hamid (Rembau), and Datuk Johan Pahlawan Lela Perkasa Setiawan Datuk Haji Muhammed Abdullah (Johol). The posts of Undang Luak Jelebu and Datuk Shahbandar Sungei Ujong remain vacant.

The Dewan concluded by urging all parties not to spread baseless claims about the institutions of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the Undang, stressing that these adat institutions are a trust held for the people and heirs, not the property of any party or individual.

AI kiosk that can translate any language and file tourist reports? Saifuddin challenges staff to innovate

Malaysia’s SMART team returns from Nepal humanitarian relief mission early this morning

Malaysia, Thailand strengthen energy ties with new joint development area agreements, says Akmal Nasrullah

Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) 认为六人试图罢免端姑穆里兹作为森美兰州元首的行为，根据法律和法律，属于叛国罪。

调查发现，四名签署人没有合法职位，并发布了非法指令，导致他们的行为被驳回，并被警方立案调查。

DKU强调继续承认端姑慕赫里兹，并澄清了Undang的立场，同时对可能侵犯其管辖权的拟议和解委员会表示担忧。

它重申端姑慕里兹仍然是合法的国家元首，目前办公室没有空缺。

芙蓉，9 月 14 日 — Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) 宣布，六名个人签署了一份日期为 9 月 5 日的文件，寻求废黜森美兰州最高大臣，其行为根据法令和法律被视为叛国。

迪万表示，四名签署人并未担任他们所声称的职位，向政府官员发出非法指令，并试图在未按照州宪法规定进行强制调查的情况下罢免端姑慕赫里兹·端姑慕纳维尔。

法院裁定，任何政府官员均不得依据9月5日的文件采取任何行动，并指示州政府继续承认端姑慕赫里兹为最高元首。法院还指示其秘书就六名人士向警方报案，指出其中四人签署了2026年9月5日的文件，但并未担任其声称代表的职务。

德万进一步对州政府提议成立和解委员会表示关切，称根据森美兰州宪法第十六条的规定，习俗事务完全属于其管辖范围。德万表示将向州政府寻求澄清该委员会的职权范围。

议会在声明中重申了其7月31日的裁决，即4月19日的公告违宪，因为四位签署人中有三位当时未被承认为合法议员。声明强调，根据宪法第十条第一款的规定，从未进行过任何调查，而且端姑慕赫里兹也从未收到通知或有机会陈述意见。

国会指出，当时的州务大臣于4月20日拒绝签署该公告，使其无效。国会还补充说，新任州务大臣随后试图签署同一份公告，但未能使其恢复效力，因为根据宪法第十条第二款，该项职能已履行完毕。

声明称，9 月 5 日和 9 月 8 日发布的公告没有产生任何效果，因为它们完全依赖于有缺陷的 4 月 19 日公告和随后于 8 月 3 日发布的文件，而这些文件并没有增加其合法性。

下议院强调，端姑慕力仍然是合法的国家元首和下议院主席，不存在空缺。它还澄清了目前Undang职位的持有者：Datuk Klana Petra Muhammad Faris Johari（Sungei Ujong）、Datuk Sedia Raja Haji Hassan Ab Hamid（Rembau）和Datuk Johan Pahlawan Lela Perkasa Setiawan Datuk Haji Muhammed Abdullah（Johol）。 Undang Luak Jelebu 和 Datuk Shahbandar Sungei Ujong 的职位仍然空缺。

议会最后敦促各方不要散布关于最高统治者和继承人的无端指控，并强调这些习俗制度是为人民和继承人设立的信托，而不是任何一方或个人的财产。

能翻译任何语言并提交旅游报告的人工智能自助服务终端？赛夫丁鼓励员工创新。

马来西亚SMART救援队今天清晨结束尼泊尔人道主义救援任务返回。

阿克马尔·纳斯鲁拉表示，马来西亚和泰国通过新的联合开发区协议加强了能源联系。