AI is going rogue. Who should be held responsible?人工智能正在失控。谁应该为此负责？
There are some cases where AI companies would clearly be held responsible, the experts said; for example, if executives understand predicted risks posed by their models.
Many think AI companies should be held liable for their runaway technology. But legal scholars say applying existing law could be messy. — Lucas Foglia/The New York Times
WASHINGTON: In recent weeks, an unlikely coalition has assembled around a simple idea: Artificial intelligence companies should be held legally responsible when their systems go rogue.
In a series of escalating attacks reported since July, AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic and others have hacked companies and even meddled with government websites, all without the knowledge of their creators.
A timeline of developments in AI safety since the attack on Hugging Face
Anthropic says its AI models could manipulate, blackmail and harm humans
Thank you for your report!
Singapore to strengthen AI safeguards as technology make rapid advances
AI to be integrated into management of archives
OpenAI's Altman says AI benefits warrant accepting some risks
许多人认为人工智能公司应该为其失控的技术承担责任。但法学专家表示，适用现有法律可能会很棘手。——卢卡斯·福格利亚/《纽约时报》
华盛顿：最近几周，一个看似不太可能的联盟围绕着一个简单的想法聚集起来：当人工智能系统失控时，应该追究人工智能公司的法律责任。
自 7 月以来，一系列不断升级的攻击事件中，OpenAI、Anthropic 和其他公司的 AI 模型入侵了多家公司，甚至干扰了政府网站，而所有这些攻击都是在其创建者不知情的情况下发生的。
自 Hugging Face 遭受攻击以来，人工智能安全领域发展的时间线
安特罗皮克公司称，其人工智能模型可能会操纵、勒索和伤害人类。
感谢您的报告！
随着人工智能技术的快速发展，新加坡将加强人工智能安全保障措施。
人工智能将被整合到档案管理中
OpenAI 的 Altman 表示，人工智能带来的益处值得我们承担一些风险。