Prime Minister under fire from MPs in parliament over rumoured cuts to allowances for southern police首相因传闻将削减南部警察津贴而受到议会议员的抨击。
Southern police face a 44% allowance axe, but PM Anutin insists there are no cuts. Police orders tell another story. A ฿314m shortfall sparks fury,… Read More ›
新闻视频

October 30, 2026 at 12:32 pm
in Living , Media , Politics , Thailand
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is under fire after denying police allowance cuts of up to 44% in Thailand’s insurgency-hit southern provinces. Official orders confirm the reductions, while police headquarters admits a ฿314 million allowance shortfall. Frontline officers face losing nearly ฿3,000 monthly. Meanwhile, two MPs have challenged the government’s contradictory accounts. People’s Party MP Ramadhan Panjor accuses security-linked information operations of spreading false claims blaming Parliament and shielding senior authorities. The row has widened to combat pay and welfare funding. Now, a parliamentary committee will demand answers from police, government and security chiefs on November 12.
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul denies 44% police allowance cuts despite official orders. A ฿314m shortfall sparks an MP’s accusations and a November 12 parliamentary inquiry. ( Source: Khaosod )
Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul faces mounting questions over police allowance cuts of up to 44% in Thailand’s troubled southern border provinces. Official police orders confirm substantial reductions in payments to frontline officers.
Yet the Prime Minister publicly denied that allowances were being cut. Police headquarters subsequently acknowledged a reduced budget allocation. Meanwhile, two MPs have challenged the government over conflicting explanations.
People’s Party MP Ramadhan Panjor has also accused security-linked information operations of falsely blaming Parliament. At stake is a reported ฿314 million reduction in police allowances. The dispute comes as officers prepare to receive their first payments under the 2027 fiscal year budget.
Police circular orders southern allowance cuts as ฿314 million funding reduction hits frontline officers
The controversy centres on special allowances paid to police serving in Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat. Officers stationed in four districts of neighbouring Songkhla province are also affected. These areas have experienced a prolonged separatist insurgency involving repeated attacks on security personnel.
Consequently, police receive additional payments reflecting the dangers associated with their assignments. The allowances supplement their regular salaries and form part of the financial arrangements supporting southern security operations.
On October 19, the Royal Thai Police Forward Operations Centre circulated instructions setting out substantially lower monthly payments. The document covered several categories of officers serving in the southern border region. These included special operations personnel, provincial investigators, general-duty officers and Border Patrol Police units. Notably, the circular specified actual payment amounts rather than merely proposing future reductions.
According to Thai PBS, the Royal Thai Police budget allocation for fiscal 2027 had fallen by more than ฿429 million. Of that reduction, approximately ฿314 million concerned allowances. The figures established the scale of the funding dispute. Moreover, the new payment schedules showed how individual officers would be affected.
Border Patrol Police face 44% allowance cuts as Songkhla MP raises complaints from junior officers
Special operations and provincial investigation officers previously received monthly allowances of ฿6,700. Under the new instructions, those payments would fall to ฿5,000. That represents a reduction of ฿1,700, or approximately 25%. Over a full year, an affected officer would receive ฿20,400 less if the reduced rate continued.
Separately, general-duty police faced cuts from ฿5,860 to ฿4,300 monthly. These personnel include officers involved in crime prevention, public protection and traffic operations. Their allowances would therefore fall by ฿1,560 each month, equivalent to approximately 27%. The annual difference would reach ฿18,720 if maintained for 12 months.
Border Patrol Police personnel faced the largest reported reductions. Their monthly allowances would fall from ฿6,780 to ฿3,820. That represents a loss of ฿2,960 every month, or approximately 44%. Consequently, an officer receiving that rate would lose ฿35,520 over a full year. The precise reductions depend on individual duties and assignments.
The controversy first reached Parliament on October 22. Democrat Party MP Jury Numkaew, representing Songkhla, raised complaints from junior officers serving in the southern border provinces. His intervention also concerned personnel stationed in four districts of Songkhla. By then, the reductions had already been communicated through official police channels.
Regional police acknowledge budget constraints before Anutin rejects reports of southern allowance cuts
The complaints followed an administrative order signed by Police Lieutenant General Piyawat Chalermsri, commander of Provincial Police Region 9. Thai PBS reported that the order reduced allowances for affected personnel. In response, the regional commander issued a message acknowledging budget constraints. He also sought to reassure officers concerned about their payments.
Thus, senior regional police authorities had already addressed the financial problem before the Prime Minister intervened publicly. The written instructions also established that the reductions were more than unsubstantiated reports. Indeed, the dispute concerned specific payment schedules issued through the police administration.
On October 26, Anutin said he had not received a report concerning the allowance reductions. He indicated that he would consult National Police Commissioner General Samran Nuanma to establish the facts. At that stage, the Prime Minister had not publicly rejected the existence of the reported cuts.
However, his position changed following discussions at Royal Thai Police headquarters on October 28. Anutin rejected reports that Border Patrol Police and other southern officers were losing their allowances. He said the discussions had established that there was no such issue. Instead, he attributed the controversy to miscommunication.
Police spokesman confirms reduced funding despite Prime Minister’s denial of cuts to police allowances
The statement directly conflicted with the October 19 circular and the regional police instructions. Furthermore, the Royal Thai Police acknowledged that its overall budget allocation had decreased. Police Major General Siriwat Deepor, spokesman for the Royal Thai Police, confirmed the reduction on October 28.
The spokesman explained that General Samran had instructed commanders to manage their budgets and minimise the impact on personnel. Additional government funding might also be requested. Accordingly, police headquarters was discussing financial adjustments while the Prime Minister dismissed reports of allowance cuts.
The conflicting accounts became the central issue. Anutin publicly rejected the reported reductions following discussions with senior police officials. Yet the police administration had already circulated instructions specifying lower monthly payments. In parallel, its spokesman acknowledged a reduced allocation and the possibility of seeking additional funding.
The documents establish that lower allowances were ordered. They do not establish that the Prime Minister knowingly provided false information. Nevertheless, his public account differed from the administrative record and the police spokesman’s explanation. The status of the reduced payments also remained unclear.
People’s Party MP demands answers over conflicting police accounts and increased deployment claims
By Thursday, October 29, People’s Party list MP Ramadhan Panjor had entered the dispute. He demanded an explanation from the government over the allowance reductions and contradictory official statements. The MP said documents detailing the changes were circulating widely. Despite this, senior authorities had failed to provide a straightforward account.
Ramadhan highlighted the approaching first payment under the 2027 fiscal year budget. Officers were preparing to receive their allowances without clear information about the amounts involved. Meanwhile, conflicting statements from government leaders and police commanders had compounded the uncertainty.
The MP also challenged explanations suggesting that increased police deployments had forced authorities to redistribute existing funding. According to those accounts, more personnel had been assigned to the southern provinces without a corresponding budget increase. As a result, the available allocation would have to be divided among a larger number of officers.
Ramadhan described that explanation as highly unusual in government administration. He questioned why increased personnel numbers would result in reduced payments for officers already performing dangerous duties. In particular, he demanded clarification of the budget calculations and decisions behind the changes.
Ramadhan accuses security-linked pages of blaming Parliament and concealing southern police cuts
His criticism also focused on Anutin’s public denial. The Prime Minister had rejected reports of cuts despite the circulation of official police instructions. Ramadhan said the conflicting explanations had created confusion among personnel serving in high-risk areas. He also raised concerns about the impact on morale.
On another front, the People’s Party MP accused security-linked social media pages of conducting information operations against Parliament. He said some pages associated with security agencies were blaming the House of Representatives for the reductions. The accusations also targeted him personally.
Ramadhan rejected those claims. He accused the pages of distorting Parliament’s role in examining and approving the national budget. Furthermore, he described the accusations as false information intended to shift responsibility away from senior authorities.
The MP went further, accusing senior commanders or higher authorities of seeking to conceal the facts. He said the information operations disregarded complaints from lower-ranking officers serving in dangerous areas. These were accusations made by Ramadhan, rather than findings established through a formal investigation.
The allegations introduced another dispute over responsibility for the allowance reductions. Specifically, they raised questions about whether Parliament had reduced the funding available for frontline police payments. Ramadhan maintained that the accusations against MPs misrepresented the parliamentary budget process.
Parliamentary operating budget left intact as dispute shifts to police investment spending and ISOC
According to the parliamentary account, the Royal Thai Police operating budget was not reduced during parliamentary scrutiny. Instead, the reductions made during that process concerned investment expenditure. This distinction became central to the argument over who authorised the lower allowances.
Investment expenditure generally covers equipment, infrastructure and other capital requirements. Operating expenditure supports the continuing activities of government agencies. Therefore, reductions in investment allocations do not automatically explain lower monthly payments to serving officers.
Likewise, a reduction in the overall police budget does not establish that Parliament specifically ordered cuts to southern allowances. The parliamentary decisions and subsequent administrative allocations involve different stages of government spending. Ramadhan argued that these distinctions had been obscured in public explanations.
The funding arrangements for southern border security operations add another layer of complexity. Special allowances and related payments can be channelled through different government organisations. These include the Royal Thai Police and the Internal Security Operations Command, known as ISOC.
Separate police and ISOC funding channels complicate questions over responsibility for allowance cuts
Consequently, payments to personnel serving in the same region may involve separate funding streams. Different agencies also have responsibilities for managing their allocations. The dispute therefore extends beyond the overall police budget to the distribution of funds between government bodies.
The available information does not establish whether the reductions originated in the government’s initial budget allocation. Alternatively, subsequent decisions within the police administration may have affected the payments. Changes involving ISOC funding could also be relevant. The reported ฿314 million allowance shortfall has not been attributed to a specific decision-making authority.
Ramadhan said he had monitored southern security budgets over several fiscal years. Even with that experience, he found the current explanations difficult to understand. He questioned why the administration had failed to clarify the figures despite the circulation of official orders.
The MP also referred to wider changes in government budget management. He said fiscal 2027 had originally been identified as an important transitional year under the national strategy. Against that background, he reported complaints involving several categories of security and welfare payments.
Complaints widen to combat pay and welfare as House committee summons security officials for November
Beyond police allowances, Ramadhan had received concerns about special compensation and combat payments for other security units. Separately, complaints had reached him concerning relief payments for vulnerable groups. These reports suggested that the immediate police dispute was part of a broader set of payment concerns.
The most detailed figures, however, concerned officers in the southern border provinces. Their reported allowance reductions ranged from approximately 25% to 44%. Border Patrol Police personnel faced the steepest identified losses. At the same time, the overall police budget reduction exceeded ฿429 million, including approximately ฿314 million concerning allowances.
On October 29, Ramadhan formally referred the matter to the House Police Affairs Committee. Deputy committee chairman Kiatikhun Tonyang received the complaint. Subsequently, the committee arranged to seek explanations from the government and security agencies.
Relevant officials are expected to appear before the committee on November 12. Those invited include representatives of the Prime Minister, the Royal Thai Police and ISOC. The hearing will examine the disputed allocations and the administrative decisions affecting payments.
Police circular and Prime Minister’s denial form central evidence in dispute before House committee
The committee will also have the competing official accounts before it. The October 19 police circular specified lower allowances. The October 22 intervention by Democrat MP Jury Numkaew documented complaints from affected officers. Meanwhile, the regional police commander had acknowledged budget constraints.
The sequence continued on October 26, when Anutin said he had not received a report about the reductions. Two days later, he rejected reports of cuts following discussions at police headquarters. On the same day, however, the police spokesman acknowledged a reduced allocation and described efforts to manage the shortfall.
Ramadhan’s October 29 intervention added the parliamentary budget dispute and allegations concerning security-linked information operations. He maintained that Parliament had not reduced the police operating budget during its scrutiny. Rather, he identified reductions involving investment expenditure and highlighted the complexity of southern security funding.
The MP has invited officers and others possessing relevant information to submit further evidence. He said he would use parliamentary channels to obtain clarification. His complaint now places the funding decisions and conflicting explanations before the House Police Affairs Committee.
November hearing to examine reduced allowances and conflicting accounts as southern officers await pay
The November 12 hearing will bring together agencies involved in administering the disputed payments. Their explanations will address the October 19 instructions, the reduced police allocation and the Prime Minister’s subsequent denial. The committee will also examine the respective responsibilities of the police and ISOC.
For affected personnel, the immediate issue remains the payment rates specified in the official instructions. Border Patrol Police officers face a reported monthly reduction of ฿2,960. Other categories face losses of ฿1,560 or ฿1,700. Meanwhile, the first payments under the new fiscal year are approaching.
The dispute has developed from complaints about police allowances into a confrontation over government budget decisions and contradictory official statements. Police documents specified reduced payments, while headquarters acknowledged a funding shortfall. Yet Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul publicly rejected reports of cuts. The House Police Affairs Committee is scheduled to examine the competing accounts on November 12.
Six dead in deadly clashes in Southern Thailand including a policeman killed on National Police Day
Police and security forces crush insurgents linked to the July 22nd checkpoint atrocity in Narathiwat
Two senior policemen killed in Tak Bai drug operation on Sunday. Detectives looking at insurgency links
Ranger killed in heavy Narathiwat security operation. Extended battle between army and insurgents
21 year old suspect arrested in Bangkok linked with recent Pattani bombing spree targeting fuel stations
Police officer’s wife killed in troubled Pattani province on Monday holding her baby by hajib gunmen
29 year old Police Sergeant dies after insurgent attack on a new Pattani police station on Friday evening
Fiery signal before visit of Prime Minister Anutin to southern provinces on Friday after attack on MP
Southern army units robustly deny any involvement in attempted assassination of Prachachart Party MP
Army commander in South to provide details of probe into senior officer linked with the ambush of an MP
‘Mastermind’ of plot to kill Prachachart MP Kamolsak Leewama is the key to case say investigating police
PM orders security agency to get to the bottom of disturbing reports linking it to an attack on an MP
Prime Minister Anutin condemns cowardly attack on Southern Muslim MP who voted for him on Thursday
Joseph Anthony is an expat from Ireland who has lived in Thailand for the last decade. He has worked extensively in the media including editorial positions in Ireland and Thailand. He is focused on economic and business stories in Thailand as well as the expat lifestyle.
All posts by Joseph O' Connor
Knock on the door coming for 10k visa overstayers now in Thailand as police launch new crackdown October 26, 2026 Thailand launches a nationwide hunt for over 10,000
19 year old hothead lands in jail after punching female driver who honked her car horn at him in Bangkok October 26, 2026 Terrifying scenes in Bangkok as a motorcyclist, 19,
Thailand falls behind Southeast Asian peers in race to build more flight connections as tourism fades October 24, 2026 High-season alarm for Thailand as direct international
Israeli woman on Koh Phangan faces deportation after her visa was revoked. Rising diplomatic tensions October 24, 2026 Israeli woman, 33, faces visa cancellation on Koh
American YouTuber brutally attacked robbed and beaten outside a Pattaya bar by two ‘foreign’ assailants October 22, 2026 American YouTuber Chris Barnes exposes a grim Pattaya
Prime Minister Anutin pushes a hard line on narcotics suppression which will jail even more yaba users October 22, 2026 Thailand’s drug crisis sees Anutin act with new
Departures tax to be axed as Thailand’s hotel sector reels from a debt crisis linked with the Covid era October 22, 2026 Revolt puts Thailand’s ฿1,000 departure tax in
12 properties raided, 85 people charged after Pattaya police raids linked to the illegal foreign ownership crackdown October 21, 2026 Police target ฿800 million in Pattaya property
Controversy on two wheels rages in Pattaya as city’s mototaxi drivers switch to blue vests from orange October 21, 2026 Blue replaces orange for 5,281 Pattaya motorcycle taxi
Queen Suthida meets the Emperor and Empress of Japan on a visit promoting international women’s ice hockey October 21, 2026 Queen Suthida meets Japan’s Emperor Naruhito and
Men accused of murdering Russian siblings in July plead guilty to all counts in Pattaya including rape October 20, 2026 Death penalty looms for two Thai men after guilty
Tourism industry shaken by the latest Chinese warning coming from its diplomatic missions in Thailand October 20, 2026 China warns its citizens of abductions and trafficking
PM orders hands off land and property by foreigners as enforcement to be moved ahead by December October 20, 2026 Anutin puts thousands of suspected foreign land
Chinese and Vietnamese links probed in police open files on nightlife activities in Bangkok and Rayong October 19, 2026 Police storm a karaoke bar at 4 am, arresting 13
Nigerian cocaine gang arrested after strict crackdown orders from the Immigration Bureau chief Big Nop October 18, 2026 Bangkok cocaine sting leads police from a dealer to a
Midnight raids in Rayong on karaoke clubs fronting for prostitution see local police chief sidelined pending enquiries October 17, 2026 Four unlicensed KTV clubs serving Chinese customers
American company director arrested in Bangkok Thursday for failing to over a million baht in wages October 17, 2026 Nearly four months after a court issued its first
Special Branch and cyber police move against the ‘Godd Dam’ Facebook page after PM ‘tea money’ fake October 26, 2026
Government spokesman’s rebuke to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Keep out of Thai internal affairs October 26, 2026
Mystery of Dutch TV star deepens as police confirm he left Thailand and lawyer claims he wants privacy October 25, 2026
Prime Minister in a spot as no confidence debate looks like it’s being stalled or postponed in parliament October 24, 2026
PM calls police chief and orders preparations to make sure Thailand is not subject to French like rioting October 22, 2026
Pledges on investment are up but Foreign Direct Investment for the first six months is down nearly 5% October 22, 2026
Frenchman arrested by Immigration. Officer spotted him on Interpol wanted list for drug trafficking October 22, 2026
Drunk woman stripped naked on a Pattaya public street Tuesday night hurling abuse. Arrested by police October 21, 2026
Former top Democrat Party aide and MP met DSI over Bhumjaithai MP’s husband’s links to online gambling October 21, 2026
Row over handling of two online gambling cases related to MPs. Questions of jurisdiction and fair play October 21, 2026
German family members injured in Phuket after app based taxi driver lost control of car looking at GPS October 20, 2026
Bhumjaithai MP and her husband answer questions of the elite DSI police over links to online gambling October 20, 2026
Hellish battle with UK Home Office for Brit seeking to bring Burmese fiancée and son home for Christmas October 20, 2026
7kg heroin in drink sachets bound for Australia found in a Samut Prakan premises after police tip off October 19, 2026
Much loved Robocop, a popular figure in Nonthaburi near Bangkok dies in a tragic road traffic accident October 19, 2026
Thai star Nene Royal faces trademark headaches in Thailand and South Korea as she secures her fortune October 18, 2026
Six dead in deadly clashes in Southern Thailand including a policeman killed on National Police Day October 17, 2026
Underfire southern MP says Prime Minister Anutin telephoned her and urged her to post a selfie online October 17, 2026
Prime Minister cock a hoop as IMF World Bank meet ends in Bangkok. Insists Thailand’s standing has risen October 17, 2026
Departures tax pushed by the Ministry of Finance is the death kiss for the tourist sector say top execs October 16, 2026
US Bangkok broadside to the IMF and the World Bank delivered by Scott Bessent who snubbed the meeting October 16, 2026
Friday protests by anti IMF World Bank activists continue after overnight camp event in central Bangkok October 16, 2026
© 2026 Thai Examiner. All rights reserved.
2026年10月30日下午12:32
在生活、媒体、政治、泰国
泰国总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔否认在受叛乱影响的南部省份削减警察津贴高达44%一事,因此备受指责。官方命令证实了这一削减,而警察总部也承认存在3.14亿泰铢的津贴缺口。一线警员每月将面临近3000泰铢的损失。与此同时,两名国会议员对政府前后矛盾的说法提出质疑。人民党议员拉马丹·潘乔指责与安全部门有关联的信息行动散布虚假信息,将责任归咎于议会,并包庇高级官员。这场争论已扩大到薪酬和福利资金方面。现在,一个议会委员会将于11月12日要求警察、政府和安全部门负责人作出解释。
尽管官方已下达命令,但泰国总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库否认削减警察津贴44%。3.14亿泰铢的资金缺口引发了一位议员的指控,并导致议会于11月12日展开调查。(来源:考索德报)
泰国总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔因泰国南部动荡边境省份警察津贴削减高达44%而面临越来越多的质疑。官方警方命令证实,一线警员的薪酬大幅降低。
然而,首相公开否认削减津贴。警察总部随后承认预算拨款有所减少。与此同时,两位议员就政府前后矛盾的解释提出质疑。
人民党议员拉马丹·潘乔尔也指责与安全相关的情报行动捏造事实,将矛头指向议会。据报道,此次事件涉及警察津贴削减3.14亿泰铢。与此同时,警员们正准备领取2027财年预算下的首笔款项。
警方通告下令削减南部地区津贴,3.14亿泰铢的经费削减影响一线警员。
争议的焦点在于向驻扎在北大年府、也拉府和那拉提瓦府的警察发放的特殊津贴。邻近的宋卡府四个县的警员也受到影响。这些地区长期遭受分离主义叛乱的困扰,安全人员屡遭袭击。
因此,警方会获得额外的津贴,以反映其任务的危险性。这些津贴是对其正常工资的补充,也是支持南部地区安全行动的财政安排的一部分。
10月19日,泰国皇家警察前线行动中心发布指令,大幅削减警员月薪。该文件涵盖了在南部边境地区服役的多个警员类别,包括特警队员、省级调查员、普通警员和边境巡逻警察部队。值得注意的是,该指令明确列出了实际的薪资削减金额,而不仅仅是提出未来的削减方案。
据泰国公共电视台(Thai PBS)报道,泰国皇家警察2027财年的预算拨款减少了超过4.29亿泰铢。其中,约3.14亿泰铢用于支付津贴。这些数字凸显了资金纠纷的严重程度。此外,新的支付方案也显示了每位警员将受到的影响。
宋卡府议员反映基层警员不满,边境巡逻警察面临44%的津贴削减。
此前,特勤队和省级调查人员每月可领取6700泰铢的津贴。根据新规定,这些津贴将降至5000泰铢,减少1700泰铢,约占总津贴的25%。如果这一减免政策持续下去,一年下来,受影响的警员将少领20400泰铢。
此外,普通警员的月薪也从5860泰铢削减至4300泰铢。这些警员包括负责预防犯罪、公共安全和交通执法的人员。因此,他们的月薪将减少1560泰铢,降幅约为27%。如果这一削减持续12个月,年度差额将达到18720泰铢。
据报道,边境巡逻警察人员面临的减薪幅度最大。他们的月津贴将从6,780泰铢降至3,820泰铢,每月减少2,960泰铢,降幅约为44%。因此,一名按此标准领取津贴的警员一年将损失35,520泰铢。具体的减薪幅度取决于个人的职责和任务安排。
这场争议于10月22日首次提交国会。代表宋卡府的民主党议员朱里·努姆凯(Jury Numkaew)提出了驻扎在南部边境省份的基层警官的投诉。他的发言还涉及驻扎在宋卡府四个县的警员。当时,裁员计划已经通过官方警务渠道公布。
地区警方承认预算紧张,但阿努廷否认了有关削减南部地区津贴的报道。
此前,泰国第九省警察局局长皮亚瓦·查勒姆斯里中将签署了一项行政命令,引发了民众的投诉。泰国公共电视台报道称,该命令削减了受影响人员的津贴。对此,第九省警察局局长发表声明,承认预算紧张,并试图安抚对薪酬感到担忧的警员。
因此,在总理公开介入之前,地区高级警官就已经着手解决财政问题。书面指示也证实,削减开支并非空穴来风,而是基于警方部门下达的具体付款计划。
10月26日,阿努廷表示他尚未收到有关津贴削减的报告。他表示将咨询国家警察总监萨姆兰·努安马将军以核实事实。当时,总理尚未公开否认有关削减津贴的报道。
然而,在10月28日于泰国皇家警察总部进行的讨论之后,他的立场发生了改变。阿努廷否认了有关边境巡逻警察和其他南部警官津贴被削减的报道。他表示,讨论已经证实不存在此类问题。相反,他将这场争议归咎于沟通不畅。
尽管首相否认削减警察津贴,但警方发言人证实,资金确实有所减少。
该声明与10月19日的通告和地方警察指令直接冲突。此外,泰国皇家警察承认其整体预算拨款有所减少。泰国皇家警察发言人西里瓦特·迪波少将于10月28日证实了这一削减。
发言人解释说,萨姆兰将军已指示各级指挥官管理好预算,尽量减少对人员的影响。他们可能还会申请额外的政府拨款。因此,警察总部正在讨论财务调整方案,而总理则驳斥了有关削减津贴的报道。
相互矛盾的说法成为焦点。阿努廷公开否认了与高级警官讨论后有关削减预算的报道。然而,警局管理层此前已下达指示,明确规定降低每月拨款。与此同时,警局发言人承认拨款减少,并表示有可能寻求额外资金。
文件证实,政府下令降低津贴。但文件并未证实总理故意提供虚假信息。然而,他的公开说法与行政记录和警方发言人的解释相矛盾。此外,减额津贴的最终状态也仍不明朗。
人民党议员要求就警方前后矛盾的说法和增加警力部署的声明作出解释
10月29日星期四,人民党议员拉马丹·潘乔尔也介入了这场争议。他要求政府就津贴削减和前后矛盾的官方声明作出解释。这位议员表示,详细说明这些变化的文件已广泛流传。尽管如此,高层官员仍未能给出明确的解释。
拉马丹强调,2027财年预算下的首笔款项即将发放。警员们正准备领取津贴,但具体金额尚不明确。与此同时,政府领导人和警官们相互矛盾的表态更加剧了这种不确定性。
这位议员还对有关增加警力部署迫使当局重新分配现有资金的解释提出质疑。根据这些说法,虽然向南部省份增派了更多警力,但预算却没有相应增加。因此,有限的资金不得不分配给更多警员。
拉马丹认为这种解释在政府行政管理中极为罕见。他质疑,为何增加人员数量反而会导致那些已经承担危险任务的官员的薪酬减少。他尤其要求政府澄清预算计算和相关决策背后的原因。
拉马丹指责与安全部门有关联的网页将责任推卸给议会,并隐瞒南部警力削减的情况。
他的批评还集中在阿努廷公开否认此事上。尽管官方警方已发出指令,但总理仍否认了有关裁员的报道。拉马丹表示,前后矛盾的解释给在高风险地区执勤的人员造成了混乱。他还对士气的影响表示担忧。
另一方面,人民党议员指责与安全部门有关联的社交媒体账号对议会进行信息战。他说,一些与安全机构有关联的账号将削减议席的责任归咎于众议院。这些指控也针对他本人。
拉马丹驳斥了这些说法。他指责这些报纸歪曲了议会在审查和批准国家预算中的作用。此外,他还称这些指控是旨在推卸高级官员责任的虚假信息。
这位议员更进一步,指责高级指挥官或上级试图掩盖事实。他说,情报行动无视了在危险地区服役的低级军官的投诉。这些指控是拉马丹提出的,而非通过正式调查得出的结论。
这些指控引发了关于津贴削减责任归属的另一场争论。具体而言,这些指控引发了人们对议会是否削减了用于一线警察薪酬的资金的质疑。拉马丹坚称,针对议员的指控歪曲了议会预算程序。
议会运作预算保持不变,争议焦点转向警察投资支出和独立安全行动中心(ISOC)。
根据议会记录,泰国皇家警察的运营预算在议会审查期间并未削减。相反,此次削减涉及的是投资支出。这一区别成为争论的焦点,即究竟是谁批准了这些削减。
投资支出通常涵盖设备、基础设施和其他资本需求。运营支出则用于支持政府机构的日常运作。因此,投资拨款的减少并不一定意味着在职官员的月薪也会降低。
同样,警察总预算的削减并不意味着议会特意下令削减南部地区的津贴。议会的决定和随后的行政拨款涉及政府支出的不同阶段。拉马丹认为,这些区别在公开解释中被掩盖了。
南部边境安全行动的资金安排使情况更加复杂。特殊津贴和相关款项可以通过不同的政府机构发放,其中包括泰国皇家警察和内部安全行动指挥部(ISOC)。
警察和独立安全行动中心(ISOC)的独立资金渠道使得津贴削减的责任归属问题变得复杂。
因此,同一地区人员的薪酬可能涉及不同的资金来源。不同的机构也负责管理各自的拨款。因此,争议的范围不仅限于警察总预算,还延伸到政府机构之间的资金分配。
现有信息无法确定削减款项是否源于政府最初的预算拨款。此外,警务部门后续的决策也可能影响了款项的支付。涉及内部安全行动中心(ISOC)资金的变动也可能与此相关。据报道,3.14亿泰铢的津贴缺口尚未明确具体由哪一方决策。
拉马丹表示,他曾连续几个财政年度监督南方地区的安全预算。即便如此,他仍然觉得目前的解释难以理解。他质疑,尽管官方命令已经下发,为何政府仍未对相关数字做出澄清。
这位议员还提到了政府预算管理方面的更广泛改革。他表示,根据国家战略,2027财年最初被确定为一个重要的过渡年。在此背景下,他报告了涉及几类安全和福利金的投诉。
随着众议院委员会传唤安全官员于11月出席听证会,针对薪酬和福利的投诉范围扩大。
除了警察津贴外,拉马丹还收到了关于其他安全部队特殊补偿和战斗津贴的投诉。此外,他还收到了关于弱势群体救济金的投诉。这些报告表明,眼前的警察纠纷只是更广泛的支付问题的一部分。
然而,最详细的数据涉及南部边境省份的警员。据报道,他们的津贴削减幅度约为25%至44%。边境巡逻警察人员面临的损失最为严重。与此同时,警察总预算削减超过4.29亿泰铢,其中包括约3.14亿泰铢的津贴削减。
10月29日,拉马丹正式将此事提交众议院警察事务委员会。委员会副主席基亚蒂昆·托尼昂接收了投诉。随后,委员会安排向政府和安全机构寻求解释。
相关官员预计将于11月12日出席委员会听证会。受邀人员包括总理、泰国皇家警察和内部安全行动中心(ISOC)的代表。听证会将审查有争议的拨款以及影响付款的行政决定。
警方通告和首相的否认构成了众议院委员会争议的核心证据。
委员会还将听取各方官方的说法。10月19日发布的警方通告规定降低津贴。10月22日,民主党议员朱里·努姆凯(Jury Numkaew)介入此事,记录了受影响警员的投诉。与此同时,地区警长也承认预算紧张。
10月26日,阿努廷再次表示他尚未收到有关削减预算的报告。两天后,在警察总部进行讨论后,他否认了有关预算削减的报道。然而,就在同一天,警方发言人承认预算有所减少,并描述了为弥补资金缺口所做的努力。
拉马丹在10月29日的发言中补充了议会预算争议以及有关安全相关信息行动的指控。他坚持认为,议会在审查期间并未削减警察运营预算。相反,他指出的是投资支出方面的削减,并强调了南部地区安全资金的复杂性。
该议员已邀请警官和其他掌握相关信息的人员提交更多证据。他表示将通过议会渠道寻求澄清。他的投诉现已提交至众议院警察事务委员会,审议有关资金决策和相互矛盾的解释。
11月将举行听证会,审查南部军官津贴减少和账目冲突等问题,他们仍在等待工资发放。
11月12日的听证会将汇集参与争议款项管理的各机构。他们将就10月19日的指示、警力拨款削减以及首相随后的否认作出解释。委员会还将审查警方和独立安全行动中心(ISOC)各自的职责。
对于受影响人员而言,眼下最紧迫的问题仍然是官方指令中规定的薪酬标准。据报道,边境巡逻警察每月将减少2960泰铢的工资。其他类别人员则面临1560泰铢或1700泰铢的减薪。与此同时,新财年的首批工资即将发放。
这场争端最初源于对警察津贴的抱怨,后来演变为围绕政府预算决策和相互矛盾的官方声明的对抗。警方文件明确指出津贴有所减少,而总部也承认存在资金缺口。然而,总理阿努廷·查恩维拉库尔公开否认了削减津贴的报道。众议院警察事务委员会定于11月12日审查双方的说法。
泰国南部发生致命冲突,六人死亡,其中包括一名在全国警察日殉职的警察。
警方和安全部队在纳拉提瓦府击溃了与7月22日检查站暴行有关的叛乱分子
周日,两名高级警官在德拜缉毒行动中殉职。侦探正在调查此案与叛乱的关联。
一名游骑兵在纳拉提瓦府的大规模安全行动中丧生。军队与叛乱分子之间爆发了长时间的战斗。
一名21岁嫌疑人在曼谷被捕,他与近期发生在北大年府的一系列针对加油站的爆炸案有关。
周一,在动荡不安的北大年府,一名警察的妻子抱着婴儿被戴头巾的枪手杀害。
周五晚间,北大年府一处新建警局遭到叛乱分子袭击,一名29岁的警长不幸殉职。
在总理阿努廷周五访问南部省份之前,议员遇袭事件引发了强烈的信号。
南方军队强烈否认参与企图暗杀普拉查特党议员的行动。
南部陆军指挥官将提供有关高级军官与议员遭伏击事件有关的调查详情。
警方调查人员称,策划谋杀普拉查特议员卡莫萨克·利瓦玛的“幕后主使”是破案的关键。
总理命令安全机构彻查有关其与议员遇袭事件有关的令人不安的报道。
阿努廷总理谴责周四发生在南方穆斯林议员身上的懦弱袭击,该议员曾投票支持他。
约瑟夫·安东尼是一位来自爱尔兰的侨民,过去十年一直居住在泰国。他曾在爱尔兰和泰国的媒体行业担任过编辑职务,拥有丰富的媒体从业经验。他主要关注泰国的经济和商业新闻,以及侨民的生活方式。
约瑟夫·奥康纳的所有帖子
泰国警方发起新一轮打击行动,追捕1万名签证逾期滞留者(2026年10月26日) 泰国在全国范围内展开搜捕行动,追捕超过1万名签证逾期滞留者
2026年10月26日,曼谷一名19岁摩托车手因殴打鸣笛女司机而被捕入狱。事发时曼谷上演了令人震惊的一幕。
随着旅游业的衰退,泰国在建设更多航线连接方面落后于东南亚其他国家(2026年10月24日) 泰国旅游旺季警报:直航国际航线减少
一名以色列女子在帕岸岛面临签证被吊销后被驱逐出境。外交紧张局势加剧 2026年10月24日 一名33岁的以色列女子在帕岸岛面临签证被取消的困境
2026年10月22日,美国YouTube博主克里斯·巴恩斯在芭堤雅一家酒吧外遭到两名“外国”袭击者残忍袭击、抢劫和殴打。巴恩斯揭露了芭堤雅的黑暗面。
泰国总理阿努廷对毒品问题采取强硬立场,将有更多吸食冰毒者入狱 2026年10月22日 泰国毒品危机促使阿努廷采取新举措
泰国酒店业因新冠疫情引发的债务危机而遭受重创,离境税或将取消 2026年10月22日 民众抗议泰国1000泰铢的离境税
芭堤雅警方突击搜查12处房产,85人被控,此次行动与打击非法外资房产有关(2026年10月21日)。警方目标是芭堤雅价值8亿泰铢的房产。
芭堤雅两轮车争议:摩托出租车司机将背心颜色由橙色改为蓝色 2026年10月21日 芭堤雅5281辆摩托出租车司机将背心颜色由橙色改为蓝色
2026年10月21日,苏提达王后访问日本,旨在推广国际女子冰球运动,并会见了日本天皇和皇后。苏提达王后会见了日本天皇德仁。
两名被控于7月在芭堤雅谋杀俄罗斯兄妹的男子,于2026年10月20日认罪,承认所有指控,包括强奸罪。两名泰国男子因罪名成立,面临死刑。
泰国旅游业受到中国驻外使领馆最新警告的震动 2026年10月20日 中国警告其公民提防绑架和人口贩运
总理下令禁止外国人侵占土地和房产,执法行动将于2026年10月20日前推进。阿努廷将数千块疑似外国土地划为非法占地。
2026年10月19日,警方公开调查曼谷和罗勇夜生活场所的中国和越南关联,并展开调查。凌晨4点,警方突袭一家卡拉OK酒吧,逮捕13人。
2026年10月18日,在移民局局长“大诺普”(Big Nop)的严厉打击下,一个尼日利亚可卡因团伙在曼谷落网。此次缉毒行动将警方从一名毒贩引向了最终的犯罪团伙。
2026年10月17日午夜,罗勇府警方突击搜查以卖淫为幌子的卡拉OK俱乐部,当地警察局长因接受调查而被停职。四家无证KTV俱乐部为中国顾客提供服务。
一名美国公司董事周四在曼谷被捕,原因是拖欠超过一百万泰铢的工资(2026年10月17日)。此前近四个月,法院首次发出逮捕令。
2026年10月26日,在总理“茶钱”造假事件曝光后,特别部门和网络警察对“Godd Dam”脸书页面采取行动
政府发言人驳斥世界卫生组织(世卫组织):不要干涉泰国内政 2026年10月26日
荷兰电视明星的神秘行踪愈发扑朔迷离,警方证实他已离开泰国,律师则声称他希望保持隐私。2026年10月25日
首相处境艰难,不信任投票似乎将在议会陷入停滞或推迟(2026年10月24日)
总理召见警察局长,命令做好准备,确保泰国不会像法国那样在2026年10月22日发生骚乱。
投资承诺有所增加,但前六个月的外国直接投资下降了近5%(2026年10月22日)
一名法国男子因涉嫌贩毒被移民局逮捕。官员于2026年10月22日在国际刑警组织的通缉名单上发现了他的踪迹。
周二晚间,一名醉酒女子在芭堤雅街头被扒光衣服并辱骂他人。她于2026年10月21日被警方逮捕。
前民主党高级助手兼国会议员于2026年10月21日会见了泰国特别调查局,讨论泰自豪党议员的丈夫与网络赌博的关联。
围绕两起与议员有关的网络赌博案件处理方式的争议。管辖权和公平性问题 2026年10月21日
2026年10月20日,普吉岛发生一起车祸,一家德国人在乘坐网约车时因司机看GPS导航而失控受伤。
2026年10月20日,泰自豪党议员及其丈夫就网络赌博案接受泰国特警队(DSI)的质询。
一名英国男子试图将缅甸未婚妻和儿子带回家过圣诞节,却与英国内政部展开了一场艰苦卓绝的斗争(2026年10月20日)
2026年10月19日,警方根据线报在北榄府一处房屋内查获7公斤海洛因,这些海洛因藏在饮料袋中,原计划运往澳大利亚。
深受喜爱的“机械战警”(Robocop)是曼谷附近暖武里府的知名人物,于2026年10月19日因一场悲惨的交通事故去世。
泰国明星妮妮·罗亚尔(Nene Royal)在泰国和韩国面临商标纠纷,她正努力保住自己的财富。2026年10月18日
泰国南部发生致命冲突,造成六人死亡,其中包括一名在2026年10月17日国家警察日当天殉职的警察。
备受争议的南方议员称,总理阿努廷于2026年10月17日致电她,敦促她在网上发布一张自拍照。
泰国总理在曼谷举行的国际货币基金组织和世界银行会议闭幕之际沾沾自喜,坚称泰国的地位已经提升。(2026年10月17日)
财政部力推的离境税是旅游业的致命一击,高管们如是说 2026年10月16日
美国驻曼谷大使斯科特·贝森特向国际货币基金组织和世界银行发出严厉警告,他缺席了2026年10月16日举行的会议。
2026年10月16日,在曼谷市中心举行通宵露营活动后,反对国际货币基金组织和世界银行的活动人士的抗议活动仍在继续。
© 2026 Thai Examiner。版权所有。