← 返回新闻首页
军事分析研究机构

Oleshky: How Russia Governs Through Humanitarian Decline

The ongoing humanitarian crisis in the occupied Oleshky area reflects the coercive logic of Russian occupation governance in a frontline city.

ISWJordan Glynn查看原文 ↗
奥列什基:俄罗斯如何在人道主义衰退中维持统治

The ongoing humanitarian crisis in the occupied Oleshky area reflects the coercive logic of Russian occupation governance in a heavily damaged frontline city. Oleshky has become a test case for Russian rule in an area marked by depopulation, damaged infrastructure, chronic insecurity, and growing isolation from the rest of Ukraine. Rather than reversing these conditions, Russian occupation authorities appear to govern through them, leveraging residents’ increasing dependence on occupation-controlled services, institutions, and administrative systems to sustain control. As humanitarian vulnerabilities deepen and alternatives to occupation governance diminish, humanitarian decline and Russian occupation rule become mutually reinforcing.

Oleshky is a small town directly on the left (east) bank of the Dnipro River in Ukraine’s southern Kherson Oblast. Oleshky had a pre-war population of around 24,000 people, while around 40,000 people lived in the wider surrounding area of settlements on the left bank of the Dnipro (settlements including Hola Prystan, Stara Zburivka, Nova Zburivka, Kardashynka, Solontsi, Pishchanivka, Kozachi Laheri, and others).[1] Oleshky has become the epicenter of a mounting humanitarian crisis since late 2025, but similarly dire conditions exist in nearby left bank towns and villages.

Russian forces occupied these left bank settlements on February 24, 2022 — the first day of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine — during the initial military push to occupy all of Kherson Oblast from positions in occupied Crimea. Russian troops largely maintained a distance from Oleshky itself in the first few weeks of the invasion, and remaining elements of the Ukrainian city administration attempted to organize self-governance efforts and self-sufficient security patrols while refusing to directly cooperate with Russian soldiers.[2] Geolocated images show Russian forces had officially entered Oleshky as of late March 2022, breaking the tacit governance agreement that had been in place with the remaining Ukrainian officials.[3] Russian forces and occupation officials took full control of Oleshky in late April 2022, however, and about 40 percent of the pre-war population fled to Ukrainian-held territory while security checkpoints were still open.[4]

The occupation of the Oleshky area followed a similar pattern to the violent imposition of Russian rule across Ukraine. Russian forces brutally cracked down against any perceived dissent against the occupation, kidnapping and orchestrating enforced disappearances against prominent local officials or veterans of the Ukrainian military and their families.[5] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Russian forces blocked evacuation routes and humanitarian corridors in the early stages of the invasion, effectively trapping people in the Oleshky area.[6] Oleshky also faced many of the same demographic engineering tactics that Russia has applied elsewhere in occupied Ukraine, including the resettlement of Russians into the area and the parallel forced removal or deportation of Ukrainians.[7] In one particularly notable instance, Russia forcibly removed 84 disabled adult and minor residents from the Oleshky Specialized Boarding School, relocating the residents to care facilities throughout occupied Ukraine and Russia — a clear example of forced transfer and illegal deportation under international law.[8]

After Ukraine liberated western Kherson Oblast up to the Dnipro River in November 2022, Oleshky and its neighbors became the new Kherson Oblast frontline, firmly under Russia’s grasp and increasingly trapped by their geography. Russian forces dug into positions in and around Oleshky, often co-mingling with civilian residents and basing military equipment in the area.[9] Ukrainian open-source investigative outlet Slidstvo Info reported that units of the 126th Coastal Defense Brigade (Russian Black Sea Fleet) and the 331st Guards Airborne Regiment (98th Airborne [VDV] Division) are likely based in or near Oleshky and may be complicit in various abuses against the civilian population in the area.[10]

Oleshky and other settlements on the Dnipro’s left bank suffered disproportionately because of Russia’s June 6, 2023 destruction of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant (KHPP) dam.[11] The subsequent flooding nearly submerged the Oleshky area entirely, and Russian forces refused to facilitate evacuation or humanitarian support efforts. Up to 500 residents of Oleshky may have died during the flooding because Russian forces reportedly refused to evacuate anyone without a Russian passport.[12] The flooding of cemeteries throughout the area led to water contamination that created an acute sanitation crisis.[13] Russian occupation officials exploited the flood to consolidate further control over Oleshky’s residents, reportedly demanding 10,000-ruble ($120) payments for the replacement of documents washed away by the floodwater.[14] Residents of occupied Oleshky found themselves dependent on, and indebted to, the Russian occupation administration to escape from the humanitarian devastation that Russian forces themselves caused by blowing up the KHPP dam.

Russian occupation policies have contributed to a sharp decline in an already-challenging humanitarian situation in the Oleshky area since December 2025. Oleshky’s location directly on the Dnipro River frontline has exposed its residents to constant drone and artillery strikes, and the co-placement of Russian military personnel and equipment with civilian infrastructure has undoubtedly complicated Ukrainian strike operations against military targets on the left bank. The Russian occupation administration has continuously refused to take steps to ensure the safety or wellbeing of residents in the face of these military threats, however, and stopped the delivery of food and other critical supplies into Oleshky in late December 2025 by citing the threat of Ukrainian drone strikes.[15] Residents reported hunting for food and noted that there were cases of deaths due to starvation, freezing, or lack of medical care as of March 2026.[16] Ukrainian sources reported that Oleshky’s occupation leadership fled the town for Skadovsk (south of Oleshky, deeper in the rear of occupied Kherson Oblast) in March, abandoning and isolating local residents.[17] The roads out of Oleshky have become so dangerous due to drone and artillery strikes and unexploded mines, including ordnance that Russian forces reportedly retroactively laid to enforce the effective blockade of the area, that egress from the town is effectively impossible.[18] Up to three to four thousand civilians, including children, remain within Oleshky itself as of September 2026.[19] UN and Ukrainian estimates place the population of the wider area around Oleshky and Hola Prystan at 6,000.[20]

Russia has failed to deliver food, medicine, or other critical goods to the Oleshky area since May 2026. The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine ( HRMMU) published a report on June 25 that found that there had been no food deliveries into Oleshky since May 26.[21] Residents have resorted to eating ground up grains and pasta mixed with baking soda and liquid from expired canned foods, grass, or soup made from garden weeds to survive.[22] An Oleshky resident posted on social media on September 1 that with the end of fruit and vegetable season approaching, people are increasingly “panicky” out of fears that there will be nothing left to eat.[23]

Deaths from starvation or illness are driving a critical sanitary situation in the Oleshky area as residents are unable to bury the bodies of the dead or use the city morgue, which has been completely destroyed.[24] Stray dogs have reportedly become used to the taste of human flesh.[25] Russian officials still had not facilitated food shipment to the Oleshky area as of September 29. Ukrainian Kherson Oblast Head Oleksandr Prokhudin reported on September 27 that units of the Ukrainian National Guard and Marines managed to conduct a covert drone operation to drop four tons of food into Oleshky to ease famine conditions.[26] Prokhudin warned, however, that Russian forces tried to shoot down the drones and are beating residents who were able to collect the delivered aid.

The Kremlin itself has acknowledged it is aware of the situation in the Oleshky area, but has refused to engage in any good-faith efforts to address the situation despite repeated Ukrainian government outreach. Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov acknowledged during a press briefing on September 21 that there are challenges with food and medicine supply to occupied Oleshky, but blamed Ukraine entirely for the situation.[27] Alexander “Sasha” Kots, a prominent milblogger who serves on the Kremlin’s Human Rights Council, responded to the situation by similarly blaming Ukraine and called for the opening of a humanitarian corridor to occupied Melitopol (about 200 kilometers east of Oleshky in the rear of Russian-occupied Zaporizhia Oblast).[28] There have been no formal Kremlin offers for a ceasefire to secure a humanitarian corridor out of Oleshky as of the time of writing, however. Ukrainian officials, on the other hand, have made several attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin over the issue of Oleshky:

First attempt: Ukrainian Ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets first raised the issue of a negotiated local humanitarian ceasefire in order to evacuate residents from Oleshky and nearby settlements in May 2026.[29] Lubinets appealed to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which stated it was ready to help organize evacuations from the Oleshky area. Lubinets and unspecified Russian counterparts reportedly discussed the situation in Oleshky on May 15, but no agreements arose from these discussions.[30]

Second attempt goes unanswered: Ukraine’s ceasefire proposals remained unanswered as of July 2026. Lubinets sent another appeal to the ICRC to engage with Russia over the establishment of a localized ceasefire.[31] Limited occupied Kherson Oblast-based Russian sources claimed that Russia enacted a unilateral localized ceasefire in late July, but Ukraine and the ICRC did not appear to receive any notification, therefore making the ceasefire unenforceable.[32]

Localized ceasefire efforts fall apart: Lubinets announced that Russia effectively reneged on all prior unofficial agreements working towards a localized Oleshky ceasefire as of September 2026. [33] The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported on September 23 that Ukraine and the ICRC were ready to deliver food and medical aid to Oleshky, but that Russia continued to block the supplies and stall negotiation efforts.[34]

The situation in Oleshky and the Kremlin’s deliberate non-response reveal a certain logic to Russian occupation policies in Ukraine that rely heavily on the mutually reinforcing conditions of humanitarian deprivation and imposed occupation governance. Russia’s occupation of Oleshky and surrounding Kherson Oblast settlements created conditions of manufactured dependence on the occupation administration for basic administrative and bureaucratic functions that, in turn, were necessary for the conduct of everyday life. This dependence intensified the more isolated Oleshky became from both Ukrainian-controlled territory across the Dnipro River and other occupied settlements in Kherson Oblast. Russia has further weaponized the dependence resulting from its occupation by exacerbating conditions of humanitarian deprivation in the Oleshky area. Russia has systematically failed to respond decisively to the level of need displayed by the populations it occupies, instead using deprivation conditions as a means of further consolidating its control over occupied areas.

Russia notably applied a similar template during its siege of Mariupol between March and May 2022. Russian military operations effectively blockaded the city, Russian forces inhibited humanitarian evacuation efforts, and Russian occupation officials used deprivation of food, water, heating, and medical care as a method of warfare to consolidate further control of the area and its residents.[35] Ukrainian lawyers submitted a dossier to the International Criminal Court in 2024 alleging that Russia engaged in a deliberate pattern of starvation tactics in Mariupol — conditions eerily similar to the current situation in the Oleshky area.[36]

Oleshky represents a complete and total abrogation of Russia’s international legal responsibilities as a belligerent occupying power. The Kremlin has clearly demonstrated it is aware of the severity of the situation in Oleshky but has repeatedly been the party to reject or ignore Ukrainian and international proposals for a localized ceasefire. International humanitarian law requires Russia, as the occupying power, to provide food, medical supplies, and humanitarian relief efforts to the population it occupies.[37] Even these failures to deliver on the basic needs of an occupied population appear deliberate, however, particularly when viewed through a broader pattern of Russian abuses across occupied Ukraine.[38] Oleshky demonstrates that the humanitarian crisis unfolding in many Russian-occupied communities is not merely a byproduct of war, but increasingly appears to be a consequence of an occupation system that tolerates, exploits, and perpetuates civilian vulnerability as a means of sustaining control.

Russia likely views any tangible response to the situation in Oleshky as a display of weakness. Russia’s delivery of critical supplies into the area would be contingent on its acceptance of a localized ceasefire agreement- something the Kremlin has repeatedly demonstrated it has no interest in. Allowing Ukraine to airdrop supplies into the area via drone would also be contingent on the acceptance of a localized ceasefire agreement. In either event, the Kremlin would likely view an easing of the situation in Oleshky as a sort of capitulation and a sign of weakness. Russia appears to have weighed the potential reputational damage of governing through a severe humanitarian crisis with accepting Ukrainian ceasefire terms, and found the former more favorable. Human lives are once again in the crossfire of Russian hubris.

[1] https://english.nv dot ua/russian-war/thousands-trapped-in-occupied-oleshky-amid-humanitarian-catastrophe-50644886.html [2] https://decentralization.gov.ua/admin/articles/14851.html [3] https://x.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1506746615297626117 [4] https://t.me/stranaua/37959; https://www.pravda dot com.ua/news/2022/04/14/7339670/ [5] https://www.radiosvoboda dot org/a/novyny-pryazovya-vtorhnennya-rosiyi-peresliduvannya/31774842.html; https://decentralization.gov dot ua/admin/articles/14851.html; https://t.me/hueviyherson/32573; https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment_9-21/ [6] https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/321589963487422 [7] https://sprotyv.mod dot gov.ua/2023/01/25/rosiyany-prymusovo-deportuvaly-selo-v-hersonskij-oblasti/ [8] https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/in-a-propaganda-move-russia-targeted-and-deported-disabled-children-from-ukraine/ [9] https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=869607857752561 [10] https://www.slidstvo.info/news/slidstvo-info-vstanovylo-rosiyskykh-viyskovykh-iaki-mozhut-buty-prychetnymy-do-humanitarnoi-katastrofy-v-oleshkakh/ [11] https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment_7-18/; https://t.me/svobodnieslova/2082; https://t.me/rybar/48127; https://meduza dot io/feature/2023/06/06/esche-para-chasov-i-gorod-uydet-pod-vodu; https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/06/16/world/europe/ukraine-kakhovka-dam-collapse.html [12] https://sprotyv.mod.gov.ua/sotni-meshkantsiv-oleshok-zapgynuly-pislya-pidryvu-ges-bo-rosiyany-vidmovyly-v-evakuatsiyi/ [13] https://t.me/rybar/48152; https://x.com/DefenceHQ/status/1667768172907229188/photo/1 [14] https://suspilne dot media/kherson/509653-v-oleskivskij-gromadi-nevidoma-kilkist-zagiblih-vid-pidtoplenna-stavlat-diagnoz-vadi-serca-miskij-golova/ [15] https://mipl.org dot ua/lyudy-pomyrayut-u-vlasnyh-domivkah-vid-holodu-ta-golodu-anonimni-svidchennya-z-okupovanyh-oleshok/ [16] https://mipl.org dot ua/lyudy-pomyrayut-u-vlasnyh-domivkah-vid-holodu-ta-golodu-anonimni-svidchennya-z-okupovanyh-oleshok/ [17] https://sprotyv dot org.ua/humanitarna-katastrofa-na-okupovanii-khersonshchyni/ ; https://t.me/sprotyv_official/8405 [18] https://lifeinwar dot com/publications/prirecheni-na-smert-yak-vizhivayut-i-vmirayut-u-peretvorenih-na-zonu-smerti-v-oleshkah-i-goliy-pristani; https://t.me/sprotyv_official/8893; https://most.ks dot ua/en/news/url/rosijani-pereminuvali-mozhlivij-pishohidnij-marshrut-z-oleshok-pislja-togo-jak-diznalisja-pro-nogo/; https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c893xj41zwdo [19] https://suspilne dot media/kherson/1401472-ludi-vidcuvaut-sebe-prirecenimi-nacalnica-mva-pro-situaciu-v-oleskah-na-tot-hersonsini/ [20] https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/Desperate-situation-for-civilians-trapped-in-frontline-areas-says-UN-Human-Rights-Ukraine [21] https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/Desperate-situation-for-civilians-trapped-in-frontline-areas-says-UN-Human-Rights-Ukraine [22] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c60qxywdx4vvo; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiqEax-Ojh8; https://x.com/andrii_sybiha/status/2103746660027228455?s=46&t=qRVLxlLsSGWt6ShPBfI5RA [23] Source available upon request. [24] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiqEax-Ojh8; https://intent.press/en/news/society/2026/oleshky-has-been-without-food-and-medicine-for-over-a-month-the-humanitarian-situation-is-critical/ [25] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/27/hell-on-earth-last-residents-eat-weeds-to-survive-in-russian-occupied-oleshky; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiqEax-Ojh8; https://intent.press/en/news/society/2026/oleshky-has-been-without-food-and-medicine-for-over-a-month-the-humanitarian-situation-is-critical/ [26] https://t.me/olexandrprokudin/15572 [27] https://tass dot ru/politika/28135265; https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-occupation-update-september-24-2026/ [28] https://t.me/sashakots/64678 [29] https://suspilne dot media/kherson/1311662-obgovoruvali-rezim-tisi-ombudsman-pro-peremovini-sodo-evakuacii-z-olesok-na-tot-hersonsini/; https://suspilne dot media/kherson/1308061-trivae-robota-sodo-napracuvanna-slahiv-evakuacii-ombudsmen-otrimav-vidpovid-vid-mtch-sodo-situacii-v-oleskah-na-tot/ [30] https://suspilne dot media/kherson/1314280-cekaemo-datu-vid-rosijskoi-storoni-lubinec-pro-pocatok-evakuacii-z-olesok-na-tot-hersonsini/ [31] https://www.ukrinform dot ua/rubric-society/4139546-evakuacia-z-olesok-lubinec-zaklikav-mkch-domogtisa-vid-rosii-rezimu-tisi-3-lipna.html [32] https://t.me/VGA_Kherson/39779 [33] https://t.me/dmytro_lubinetzs/12544 [34] https://x.com/MFA_Ukraine/status/2102759038169608697 [35] https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russians-used-starvation-method-warfare-mariupol-experts-say-2024-06-13/; https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-is-deliberately-blocking-mariupol-evacuation-ukrainian-official-says-2022-03-10/ [36] https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/13/russia-accused-of-deliberate-starvation-tactics-in-mariupol-in-submission-to-icc?CMP=telegram_guardian [37] https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-55/commentary/2025; https://x.com/CommissionerHR/status/2103409068702339400 [38] https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/13/russia-accused-of-deliberate-starvation-tactics-in-mariupol-in-submission-to-icc?CMP=telegram_guardian

手机左右滑动,电脑按 ← → 键,也能切换新闻